Framing design in the third paradigm

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1131-1140

  Ylirisku, Salu ^a   Halttunen, Virtu ^b   Nuojua, Johanna ^b   Juustila, Antti ^b  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Design framing; Reflective practice; User centered design; User driven innovation

Indexed keywords

DESIGN PARADIGM; DESIGN PROJECTS; MEANING MAKINGS; REFLECTIVE PRACTICES; USER CENTERED DESIGNS; USER-DRIVEN INNOVATION;

HUMAN ENGINEERING;

DESIGN;

EID: 84892452779     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1518701.1518874     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (41)

1. Anderson, R.J. Representations and Requirements: The Value of Ethnography in System Design. Human- Computer Interaction 9, (1994), 151-182.
2. Beyer, H., Holtzblatt, K. Contextual Design: A Customer-Centered Approach to Systems Designs. Morgan Kaufmann, (1998).
3. Blumer, H. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. University of California Press, (1998).
4. Brooks, F.P. No Silver Bullet: Essence and Accidents of Software Engineering. IEEE Computer 20, 4 (1987), 10- 19.
5. Cagan, J., Vogel, C.M. Creating Breakthrough Products: Innovation from Product Planning to Program Approval. FT Press, (2002).
6. Cooper, A. Inmates are Running the Asylum: Why High- Tech Products Drive Us Crazy and How to Restore the Sanity. SAMS, (1999).
7. Cooper, R.G. Product Leadership: Pathways to Profitable Innovation. Basic Books, New York, (2005).
8. Dorst, K., Cross, N. Creativity in the design process: co- evolution of problem-solution. Design Studies 22, 5 (2001), 425-427.
9. Forlizzi, J. Product Ecologies: Understanding the Context of Use Surrounding Products. Carnegie Mellon University, (2007).
10. Gasson, S. Framing design: A social process view of information system development. In Proc. ICIS '98, Association for Information Systems, Atlanta, GA, USA, (1998), 224-236.
11. Gibson, J.J. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, USA, (1979).
12. Goffman, E. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Northeastern University Press, USA, (1974).
13. Goodwin, C., Duranti, A. Rethinking context: an introduction. In Duranti, A. & Goodwin, C. Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge University Press, (1992) 1-42.
14. Harrison, S., Tatar, D., Sengers, P. The Three Paradigms of HCI. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, (in press), (2008).
15. Hey, J.H.G., Joyce, C.K., Beckman, S.K. Framing Innovation: negotiating shared frames during early design phases. Journal of Design Research 6, 1 -2 (2007), 79-99.
16. Hutchinson, H., Mackay, W., Westerlund, B., Bederson, B.B., Druin, A., Plaisant, C., Beaudouin-Lafon, M., Conversy, S, Evans, H., Hansen, H., Roussel, N., Eiderback, B. Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families. In Proc. CHI '03, ACM Press (2003), 17-24.
17. Johnstone, K. Impro: Improvisation and the theatre. Theatre Arts Book, (1987).
18. Jordan, B., Henderson, A. Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 4, 1 (1995), 39-103.
19. Jaasko, V., Mattelmaki, T., Ylirisku, S. The Scene of Experiences. In Proc. The Good the Bad and the Irrelevant, (2003).
20. Keinonen, T., Takala, R. Product Concept Design: A Review of the Conceptual Design of Products in Industry. Springer, (2006).
21. Kuikka, N. Asukaskeskeisid suunnittelumenetelmid kylien kehittdmiseen. Nordia tiedonantoja 3/2004. Multiprint Oy, (2004).
22. Lim, Y., Stolterman, E., Tenenberg, J. The anatomy of prototypes: Prototypes as filters, prototypes as manifestations of design ideas. ACM Trans. Comput - Hum. Interact. 15. 5 (2008), 1-27.
23. Ljungblad, S., Holmquist, L.E. Transfer scenarios: grounding innovation with marginal practices. In Proc. CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 737-746.
24. Mattelmaki, T. Design Probes. Doctoral thesis, the University of Art and Design Helsinki, (2006).
25. Mattelmaki, T, Vaajakallio, K, Ylirisku, S. Active@work - Design dealing with social change. In Proc. Include, (2007).
26. Moore, J., Buur, J. Exploring how user video supports design. In Proc. Nordic Design Research Conference, (2005).
27. Rittel, H., Webber, M. Planning Problems are Wicked Problems. In Cross, N. Developments in Design Methodology. John Wiley & Sons, (1984), 135-144.
28. Sanders, E.B.N., Dandavate, U. Designing for Experiencing: New Tools, in Overbeeke, C. J. & Hekkert, P. (ed.), In Proc. Design and Emotion, (1999).
29. Schon, D.A. Problems, frames and perspectives on designing. Design Studies 5, 3 (1984), 132-136.
30. Schon, D.A. Educating the Reflective Practitioner. Jossey-Bass, (1987).
31. Schon, D.A., Rein, M. Frame Reflection: Towards the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. Basic Books, (1994).
32. Simon, H.A. The Sciences of the Artificial. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, (1996).
33. Sleeswijk-Visser, F., Stappers, J., van der Lugt, R, Sanders, E.B.N. Contextmapping: experiences from practice. CoDesign Journal. 1, 2 (2005), 119-149.
34. Ulrich, K.T., Eppinger, S.D. Product Design and Development. McGraw-Hill, (2003).
35. Valkenburg, R.C. The Reflective Practice in product design teams. Ph.D. Thesis, TU Delft, (2000).
36. Wang, C., Burris, M.A. Photovoice: Concept, Methodology, and Use for Participatory Needs Assessment. Health Education & Behavior 24, 3 (1997), 369 - 387.
37. Williamson, J., Brown, L.M. Flutter: Directed Random Browsing of Photo Collections with a Tangible Interface. In Proc. DIS 2008, (2008).
38. Yan-Chi Kwok, J. The weight of space: participatory design research for configuring habitable space for new arrival women in Hong Kong. In Proc. PDC 2004. (2004), 183-192.
39. Ylirisku, S., Buur, J. Designing with Video: Focusing the User-Centred Design Process. Springer, (2007).
40. Ylirisku, S., Vaajakallio, K. Situated Make Tools for envisioning ICTs with ageing workers. In Proc. Include, (2007).
41. Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., Evenson, S. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proc. CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007). 493-502.