Improved precision in CHARMED assessment of white matter through sampling scheme optimization and model parsimony testing

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 71, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 661-671

  De Santis, S ^a,b   Assaf, Y ^c   Evans, C J ^a,b   Jones, D K ^a,b  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Bayesian information criterion; CHARMED; diffusion MRI; model parsimony; optimized gradient scheme

Indexed keywords

CLUSTERING ALGORITHMS; DIFFUSION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MONTE CARLO METHODS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PIPELINES; TENSORS;

ACCURACY AND PRECISION; BAYESIAN INFORMATION CRITERION; CHARMED; DATA PROCESSING PIPELINES; DIFFUSION MRIS; ELECTROSTATIC REPULSION; OPTIMIZED GRADIENTS; PARSIMONIOUS MODELING;

DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; IN VIVO STUDY; MAGNETIC FIELD; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NEUMAN SYSTEMS MODEL; NEUROIMAGING; NOISE; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATIC ELECTRICITY; WHITE MATTER; ADULT; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; BRAIN; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MALE; PROCEDURES; SAMPLE SIZE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; BRAIN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MODELS, STATISTICAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SAMPLE SIZE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; WHITE MATTER;

EID: 84892439114     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24717     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Basser PJ,. Inferring microstructural features and the physiological state of tissues from diffusion-weighted images. NMR Biomed 1995; 8: 333-344.
2. Basser PJ, Pierpaoli C,. Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. J Magn Reson B 1996; 111: 209-219.
3. Pfefferbaum A, Sullivan EV, Hedehus M, Lim KO, Adalsteinsson E, Moseley M,. Age-related decline in brain white matter anisotropy measured with spatially corrected echo-planar diffusion tensor imaging. Magn Reson Med 2000; 44: 259-268.
4. Neil J, Miller J, Mukherjee P, Huppi PS,. Diffusion tensor imaging of normal and injured developing human brain-a technical review. NMR Biomed 2002; 15: 543-552.
5. Assaf Y, Pasternak O,. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-based white matter mapping in brain research: a review. J Mol Neurosci 2008; 34: 51-61.
6. Lebel C, Caverhill-Godkewitsch S, Beaulieu C,. Age-related regional variations of the corpus callosum identified by diffusion tensor tractography. Neuroimage 2010; 52: 20-31.
7. Sotak CH,. The role of diffusion tensor imaging in the evaluation of ischemic brain injury-a review. NMR Biomed 2002; 15: 561-569.
8. Werring DJ, Clark CA, Barker GJ, Thompson AJ, Miller DH,. Diffusion tensor imaging of lesions and normal-appearing white matter in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 1999; 52: 1626-1632.
9. Sundgren PC, Dong Q, G-mez-Hassan D, Mukherji SK, Maly P, Welsh R,. Diffusion tensor imaging of the brain: review of clinical applications. Neuroradiology 2004; 46: 339-350.
10. Horsfield MA, Jones DK,. Applications of diffusion-weighted and diffusion tensor MRI to white matter diseases-a review. NMR Biomed 2002; 15: 570-577.
11. Assaf Y, Freidlin RZ, Rohde GK, Basser PJ,. New modeling and experimental framework to characterize hindered and restricted water diffusion in brain white matter. Magn Reson Med 2004; 52: 965-978.
12. Assaf Y, Basser PJ,. Composite hindered and restricted model of diffusion (CHARMED) MR imaging of the human brain. Neuroimage 2005; 27: 48-58.
13. Assaf Y, Freidlin RZ, Basser PJ,. The measurement of the axon diameter distribution in white matter using diffusion MR methods [abstract]. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Miami, Florida, USA, 2005. p. 842.
14. Assaf Y, Blumenfeld-Katzir T, Yovel Y, Basser PJ,. Axcaliber: a method for measuring axon diameter distribution from diffusion MRI. Magn Reson Med 2008; 59: 1347-1354.
15. Barazany D, Basser PJ, Assaf Y,. In vivo measurement of axon diameter distribution in the corpus callosum of rat brain. Brain 2009; 132: 1210-1220.
16. Alexander DC, Hubbard PL, Hall MG, Moore EA, Ptito M, Parker GJM, Dyrby TB,. Orientationally invariant indices of axon diameter and density from diffusion MRI. Neuroimage 2010; 52: 1374-1389.
17. De Santis S, Assaf Y, Jones DK,. Using the biophysical CHARMED model to elucidate the underpinnings of contrast in diffusional kurtosis analysis of diffusion-weighted MRI. MAGMA 2012; 25: 267-276.
18. Falangola MF, Jensen JH, Babb JS, Hu C, Castellanos FX, Martino AD, Ferris SH, Helpern JA,. Age-related non-gaussian diffusion patterns in the prefrontal brain. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 28: 1345-1350.
19. Cheung MM, Hui ES, Chan KC, Helpern JA, Qi L, Wu EX,. Does diffusion kurtosis imaging lead to better neural tissue characterization? A rodent brain maturation study. Neuroimage 2009; 45: 386-392.
20. Alexander DC,. A general framework for experiment design in diffusion MRI and its application in measuring direct tissue-microstructure features. Magn Reson Med 2008; 60: 439-448.
21. Zhang H, Schneider T, Wheeler-Kingshott CA, Alexander DC,. NODDI: practical in vivo neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging of the human brain. Neuroimage 2012; 61: 1000-1016.
22. Jones DK, Horsfield MA, Simmons A,. Optimal strategies for measuring diffusion in anisotropic systems by magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 1999; 42: 515-525.
23. Dubois J, Poupon C, Lethimonnier F, Bihan DL,. Optimized diffusion gradient orientation schemes for corrupted clinical DTI data sets. MAGMA 2006; 19: 134-143.
24. Cook PA, Symms M, Boulby PA, Alexander DC,. Optimal acquisition orders of diffusion-weighted MRI measurements. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25: 1051-1058.
25. Freidlin RZ, Ozarslan E, Komlosh ME, Chang LC, Koay CG, Jones DK, Basser PJ,. Parsimonious model selection for tissue segmentation and classification applications: a study using simulated and experimental dti data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2007; 26: 1576-1584.
26. Conturo TE, McKinstry RC, Akbudak E, Robinson BH,. Encoding of anisotropic diffusion with tetrahedral gradients: a general mathematical diffusion formalism and experimental results. Magn Reson Med 1996; 35: 399-412.
27. Hall MG, Alexander DC,. Convergence and parameter choice for Monte-Carlo simulations of diffusion MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2009; 28: 1354-1364.
28. Aja-Fernández S, Tristán-Vega A, Hoge S,. Statistical noise analysis in GRAPPA using a parametrized non-central chi approximation model. Magn Reson Med 2011; 65: 1195-1206.
29. Neuman CH,. Spin echo of spins diffusing in a bounded medium. J Chem Phys 1974; 60: 4508-4511.
30. Jones DK,. Determining and visualizing uncertainty in estimates of fiber orientation from diffusion tensor MRI. Magn Reson Med 2003; 49: 7-12.
31. Ben-Amitay S, Jones DK, Assaf Y,. Motion correction and registration of high b-value diffusion weighted images. Magn Reson Med 2012; 67: 1694-1702.
32. De Santis S, Amitay SB, Assaf Y, Jones D,. A simple model for eddy current correction in high b-values acquisitions. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Montreal, Canada, 2011. p. 4567.
33. Jeurissen B, Leemans A, Jones DK, Tournier J-D, Sijbers J,. Probabilistic fiber tracking using the residual bootstrap with constrained spherical deconvolution. Hum Brain Mapp 2011; 32: 461-479.
34. Wedeen VJ, Rosene DL, Wan R, Dai G, Mortazavi F, Hagmann P, Kaas JH, Wen-Yih I, Tseng W-YI,. The geometric structure of the brain fiber pathways. Science 2012; 335: 1628-1634.
35. Schwartz G,. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 1978; 6: 461-464.
36. O'Gorman RL, Jones DK,. Just how much data need to be collected for reliable bootstrap DT-MRI? Magn Reson Med 2006; 56: 884-890.
37. Tournier JD, Calamante F, Gadian DG, Connelly A,. Direct estimation of the fiber orientation density function from diffusion-weighted MRI data using spherical deconvolution. Neuroimage 2004; 23: 1176-1185.
38. Zhu T, Liu X, Gaugh MD, Connelly PR, Ni H, Ekholm S, Schifitto G, Zhong J,. Evaluation of measurement uncertainties in human diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-derived parameters and optimization of clinical DTI protocols with a wild bootstrap analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 29: 422-435.
39. Assaf Y, Ben-Bashat D, Chapman J, et al. High b-value q-space analyzed diffusion-weighted MRI: application to multiple sclerosis. Magn Reson Med 2002; 47: 115-126.
40. Cohen Y, Assaf Y,. High b-value q-space analyzed diffusion-weighted MRS and MRI in neuronal tissues-a technical review. NMR Biomed 2002; 15: 516-542.
41. Assaf Y, Mayzel-Oreg O, Gigi A, et al. High b value q-space-analyzed diffusion MRI in vascular dementia: a preliminary study. J Neurol Sci 2002; 203/204: 235-239.
42. Jones DK,. The effect of gradient sampling schemes on measures derived from diffusion tensor MRI: a Monte Carlo study. Magn Reson Med 2004; 51: 807-815.