Species and tokogenetic homologies: 10 sutras

Cladistics

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 10-

  Assis, Leandro C S ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892437320     PISSN: 07483007     EISSN: 10960031     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cla.12031     Document Type: Letter

References (9)

1. Assis, L.C.S., 2013. Are homology and synapomorphy the same or different? Cladistics 29, 7-9.
2. Brower, A.V.Z., de Pinna, M.C.C., 2012. Homology and errors. Cladistics 28, 529-538.
3. Hall, B.K. (Ed.), 1994. Homology: The Hierarchical Basis of Comparative Biology. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
4. Hennig, W., 1966. Phylogenetic Systematics. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL.
5. Love, A., 2007. Functional homology and homology of function: biological concepts and philosophical consequences. Biol. Philos. 22, 691-708.
6. Meier, R., Willmann, R., 2000. The Hennigian species concept. In Wheeler, Q.D., Meier, R. (Eds.), Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory: A Debate. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 30-43.
7. Mishler, B., Theriot, E., 2000. The phylogenetic species concept (sensu Mishler and Theriot). In Wheeler, Q.D., Meier, R. (Eds.), Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory: A Debate. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 44-54.
8. Müller, G.B., 2003. Homology: the evolution of morphological organization. In Müller, G.B., Newman, S.A. (Eds.), Origination of Organismal Form: beyond the Gene in Developmental and Evolutionary Biology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 51-69.
9. Wägele, J.W., 2004. Hennig's phylogenetic systematics brought up to date. In Williams, D.M., Forey, P.L. (Eds.), Milestones in Systematics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 101-126.