Evaluation and ranking of researchers - Bh index

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 12, 2013, Pages

  Bharathi, D Gnana ^a  

^a CENTRAL LEATHER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BH INDEX; CALCULATION; CITATION ANALYSIS; EVALUATION STUDY; JOB PERFORMANCE; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; PUBLICATION; SCIENTIST; TAXONOMIC RANK;

BIBLIOMETRICS; HUMANS; NOBEL PRIZE; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84892426034     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082050     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Hirsch JE (2005) An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 16569-16572. doi:10.1073/pnas.0507655102. PubMed: 16275915.
2. Vanclay JK (2007) On the robustness of the h-index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58: 1547-1550. doi:10.1002/asi.20616.
3. Bornmann L, Mutz R, Daniel HD (2008) Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? a comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59: 830-837. doi:10.1002/asi.20806.
4. Alonso S, Cabrerizo FJ, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F (2009) h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields. Journal of Informetrics 3: 273-289. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2009. 04.001.
5. Costas R, Bordons M (2007) The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level. Journal of Informetrics 1: 193-203. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2007.02.001.
6. Gibb BC (2012) Lies, damned lies and h-indices. Nat Chem 4: 513-514. doi:10.1038/nchem.1388. PubMed: 22717424.
7. Egghe L (2006) An Improvement of the h-Index: G-Index. ISSI Newsletter 2: 2.
8. Alonso S, Cabrerizo FJ, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F (2010) hg-index: a new index to characterize the scientific output of researchers based on the h- and g-indices. Scientometrics 82: 391-400. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0047-5.
9. H JB (2006) h-index: an evaluation indicator proposed by scientist. Science Focus 1: 2
10. Bornmann L, Daniel HD (2009) The state of h index research Is the h index the ideal way to measure research performance? EMBO Rep 10: 2-6. doi:10.1038/embor.2008.233. PubMed: 19079129.
11. Schreiber M (2008) An empirical investigation of the g-index for 26 physicists in comparison with the h-Index, the A-index, and the R-index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59: 1513-1522. doi:10.1002/asi.20856.
12. Zhang CT (2009) The e-Index, Complementing the h-Index for Excess Citations. PLOS ONE 4: e5429. PubMed: 19415119.
13. Prathap G (2010) The 100 most prolific economists using the p-index. Scientometrics 84: 167-172. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0068-0.
14. Stallings J, Vance E, Yang J, Vannier MW, Liang J et al. (2013) Determining scientific impact using a collaboration index. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. PubMed: 23720314
15. Egghe L (2006) Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics 69: 131-152. doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7.
16. Jin BH, Liang LM, Rousseau R, Egghe L (2007) The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index. Chinese Science Bulletin 52: 855-863. doi:10.1007/s11434-007-0145-9.
17. Gelman A, Katz JN, Tuerlinckx F (2002) The mathematics and statistics of voting power. Statistical Science 17: 420-435. doi:10.1214/ss/1049993201.