LHC data and aspects of new physics

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2014, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Alanne, Tommi ^a,b   Di Chiara, Stefano ^a   Tuominen, Kimmo ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

Phenomenological Models

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892416968     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP01(2014)041     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. A. Azatov, R. Contino and J. Galloway, Model-independent bounds on a light Higgs, JHEP 04 (2012) 127 [Erratum ibid. 04 (2013) 140] [ arXiv:1202.3415 ] [ INSPIRE ].
2. D. Carmi, A. Falkowski, E. Kuflik and T. Volansky, Interpreting LHC Higgs results from natural new physics perspective, JHEP 07 (2012) 136 [ arXiv:1202.3144 ] [ INSPIRE ].
3. J. Espinosa, C. Grojean, M. Muhlleitner and M. Trott, Fingerprinting Higgs suspects at the LHC, JHEP 05 (2012) 097 [ arXiv:1202.3697 ] [ INSPIRE ].
4. P.P. Giardino, K. Kannike, M. Raidal and A. Strumia, Reconstructing Higgs boson properties from the LHC and Tevatron data, JHEP 06 (2012) 117 [ arXiv:1203.4254 ] [ INSPIRE ].
5. M. Carena, I. Low and C.E. Wagner, Implications of a modified Higgs to diphoton decay width, JHEP 08 (2012) 060 [ arXiv:1206.1082 ] [ INSPIRE ].
6. T. Corbett, O. Eboli, J. Gonzalez-Fraile and M. Gonzalez-Garcia, Constraining anomalous Higgs interactions, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 075013 [ arXiv:1207.1344 ] [ INSPIRE ].
7. P.P. Giardino, K. Kannike, M. Raidal and A. Strumia, Is the resonance at 125 GeV the Higgs boson?, Phys. Lett. B 718 (2012) 469 [ arXiv:1207.1347 ] [ INSPIRE ].
8. J. Ellis and T. You, Global analysis of the Higgs candidate with mass ~ 125 GeV, JHEP 09 (2012) 123 [ arXiv:1207.1693 ] [ INSPIRE ].
9. D. Carmi, A. Falkowski, E. Kuflik, T. Volansky and J. Zupan, Higgs after the discovery: a status report, JHEP 10 (2012) 196 [ arXiv:1207.1718 ] [ INSPIRE ].
10. S. Banerjee, S. Mukhopadhyay and B. Mukhopadhyaya, New Higgs interactions and recent data from the LHC and the Tevatron, JHEP 10 (2012) 062 [ arXiv:1207.3588 ] [ INSPIRE ].
11. N. Arkani-Hamed, K. Blum, R.T. D'Agnolo and J. Fan, 2: 1 for naturalness at the LHC?, JHEP 01 (2013) 149 [ arXiv:1207.4482 ] [ INSPIRE ].
12. F. Bonnet, T. Ota, M. Rauch and W. Winter, Interpretation of precision tests in the Higgs sector in terms of physics beyond the Standard Model, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 093014 [ arXiv:1207.4599 ] [ INSPIRE ].
13. T. Corbett, O. Eboli, J. Gonzalez-Fraile and M. Gonzalez-Garcia, Robust determination of the Higgs couplings: power to the data, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 015022 [ arXiv:1211.4580 ] [ INSPIRE ].
14. -1 of proton-proton collision data, ATLAS-CONF-2013-012, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2013).
15. CMS collaboration, Updated measurements of the Higgs boson at 125 GeV in the two photon decay channel, CMS-PAS-HIG-13-001, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2013).
16. -1 of data, arXiv:1207.0449 [ INSPIRE ].
17. CDF and D0 collaborations, T. Aaltonen et al., Higgs boson studies at the Tevatron, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 052014 [ arXiv:1303.6346 ] [ INSPIRE ].
18. M. Carena, S. Gori, N.R. Shah, C.E. Wagner and L.-T. Wang, Light stau phenomenology and the Higgs γγ rate, JHEP 07 (2012) 175 [ arXiv:1205.5842 ] [ INSPIRE ].
19. A. Arbey, M. Battaglia, A. Djouadi and F. Mahmoudi, The Higgs sector of the phenomenological MSSM in the light of the Higgs boson discovery, JHEP 09 (2012) 107 [ arXiv:1207.1348 ] [ INSPIRE ].
20. J.-J. Cao, Z.-X. Heng, J.M. Yang, Y.-M. Zhang and J.-Y. Zhu, A SM-like Higgs near 125 GeV in low energy SUSY: a comparative study for MSSM and NMSSM, JHEP 03 (2012) 086 [ arXiv:1202.5821 ] [ INSPIRE ].
21. N.D. Christensen, T. Han and S. Su, MSSM Higgs bosons at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 115018 [ arXiv:1203.3207 ] [ INSPIRE ].
22. J.F. Gunion, Y. Jiang and S. Kraml, The constrained NMSSM and Higgs near 125 GeV, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 454 [ arXiv:1201.0982 ] [ INSPIRE ].
23. S. King, M. Muhlleitner and R. Nevzorov, NMSSM Higgs benchmarks near 125 GeV, Nucl. Phys. B 860 (2012) 207 [ arXiv:1201.2671 ] [ INSPIRE ].
24. J. Ellis and K.A. Olive, Revisiting the Higgs mass and dark matter in the CMSSM, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2005 [ arXiv:1202.3262 ] [ INSPIRE ].
25. R. Contino, D. Marzocca, D. Pappadopulo and R. Rattazzi, On the effect of resonances in composite Higgs phenomenology, JHEP 10 (2011) 081 [ arXiv:1109.1570 ] [ INSPIRE ].
26. J. Espinosa, C. Grojean and M. Muhlleitner, Composite Higgs under LHC experimental scrutiny, EPJ Web Conf. 28 (2012) 08004 [ arXiv:1202.1286 ] [ INSPIRE ].
27. N. Haba, K. Kaneta, Y. Mimura and R. Takahashi, Enhancement of Higgs to diphoton decay width in non-perturbative Higgs model, Phys. Lett. B 718 (2013) 1441 [ arXiv:1207.5102 ] [ INSPIRE ].
28. M.T. Frandsen and F. Sannino, Discovering a light scalar or pseudoscalar at the Large Hadron Collider, arXiv:1203.3988 [ INSPIRE ].
29. C. Du et al., Discovering new gauge bosons of electroweak symmetry breaking at LHC-8, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 095011 [ arXiv:1206.6022 ] [ INSPIRE ].
30. T. Abe, N. Chen and H.-J. He, LHC Higgs signatures from extended electroweak gauge symmetry, JHEP 01 (2013) 082 [ arXiv:1207.4103 ] [ INSPIRE ].
31. ′ limits for minimal walking technicolor, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 055017 [ arXiv:1105.1433 ] [ INSPIRE ].
32. S. Dimopoulos and L. Susskind, Mass without scalars, Nucl. Phys. B 155 (1979) 237 [ INSPIRE ].
33. E. Farhi and L. Susskind, Technicolor, Phys. Rept. 74 (1981) 277 [ INSPIRE ].
34. N. Arkani-Hamed, A. Cohen, E. Katz and A. Nelson, The littlest Higgs, JHEP 07 (2002) 034 [ hep-ph/0206021 ] [ INSPIRE ].
35. N. Arkani-Hamed et al., The minimal moose for a little Higgs, JHEP 08 (2002) 021 [ hep-ph/0206020 ] [ INSPIRE ].
36. L. Randall and R. Sundrum, A large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 3370 [ hep-ph/9905221 ] [ INSPIRE ].
37. N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos and G. Dvali, The hierarchy problem and new dimensions at a millimeter, Phys. Lett. B 429 (1998) 263 [ hep-ph/9803315 ] [ INSPIRE ].
38. F. Sannino and K. Tuominen, Orientifold theory dynamics and symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 051901 [ hep-ph/0405209 ] [ INSPIRE ].
39. D.D. Dietrich, F. Sannino and K. Tuominen, Light composite Higgs from higher representations versus electroweak precision measurements: predictions for CERN LHC, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 055001 [ hep-ph/0505059 ] [ INSPIRE ].
40. A. Belyaev et al., Technicolor walks at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 035006 [ arXiv:0809.0793 ] [ INSPIRE ].
41. M. Antola, M. Heikinheimo, F. Sannino and K. Tuominen, Unnatural origin of fermion masses for technicolor, JHEP 03 (2010) 050 [ arXiv:0910.3681 ] [ INSPIRE ].
42. G. Branco et al., Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models, Phys. Rept. 516 (2012) 1 [ arXiv:1106.0034 ] [ INSPIRE ].
43. ATLAS collaboration, Measurements of Higgs boson production and couplings in diboson final states with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 726 (2013) 88 [ arXiv:1307.1427 ] [ INSPIRE ].
44. ATLAS collaboration, Search for the bb decay of the Standard Model Higgs boson in associated W/ZH production with the ATLAS detector, ATLAS-CONF-2013-079, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2013).
45. CMS collaboration, M. Vidal, Higgs physics at the CMS, presentation at ICNFP 2013, Kolymbari Crete Greece August 28-September 5 2013.
46. ATLAS collaboration, Search for the Standard Model Higgs boson in H → τ τ decays in proton-proton collisions with the ATLAS detector, ATLAS-CONF-2012-160, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2012).
47. J.F. Gunion, H.E. Haber, G.L. Kane and S. Dawson, The Higgs hunter's guide, Front. Phys. 80 (2000) 1 [ INSPIRE ].
48. -1 of pp collisions at √ s = 7 TeV, ATLAS-CONF-2012-086, CERN, Geneva Switzerland (2012).
49. - collisions at energies up to √ s = 209 GeV, Phys. Lett. B 543 (2002) 1 [ hep-ex/0207054 ] [ INSPIRE ].
50. LHC Higgs Cross section Working Group collaboration, S. Dittmaier et al., Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 1. Inclusive observables, arXiv:1101.0593 [ INSPIRE ].
51. LHC Higgs Cross section Working Group collaboration, S. Dittmaier et al., Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 2. Differential distributions, arXiv:1201.3084 [ INSPIRE ].
52. M.E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, Estimation of oblique electroweak corrections, Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 381 [ INSPIRE ].
53. H.-J. He, N. Polonsky and S.-F. Su, Extra families, Higgs spectrum and oblique corrections, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 053004 [ hep-ph/0102144 ] [ INSPIRE ].
54. Particle Data Group collaboration, J. Beringer et al., Review of particle physics (RPP), Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 010001 [ INSPIRE ].
55. E.H. Simmons, Phenomenology of a technicolor model with heavy scalar doublet, Nucl. Phys. B 312 (1989) 253 [ INSPIRE ].
56. S. Samuel, Bosonic technicolor, Nucl. Phys. B 347 (1990) 625 [ INSPIRE ].
57. A. Kagan and S. Samuel, Renormalization group aspects of bosonic technicolor, Phys. Lett. B 270 (1991) 37 [ INSPIRE ].
58. C.D. Carone and E.H. Simmons, Oblique corrections in technicolor with a scalar, Nucl. Phys. B 397 (1993) 591 [ hep-ph/9207273 ] [ INSPIRE ].
59. V. Hemmige and E.H. Simmons, Current bounds on technicolor with scalars, Phys. Lett. B 518 (2001) 72 [ hep-ph/0107117 ] [ INSPIRE ]. (Pubitemid 32937176)
60. M. Dine, W. Fischler and M. Srednicki, Supersymmetric technicolor, Nucl. Phys. B 189 (1981) 575 [ INSPIRE ].
61. M. Antola, S. Di Chiara, F. Sannino and K. Tuominen, Minimal super technicolor, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1784 [ arXiv:1001.2040 ] [ INSPIRE ].
62. M. Antola, S. Di Chiara, F. Sannino and K. Tuominen, Supersymmetric extension of technicolor & fermion mass generation, Nucl. Phys. B 864 (2012) 664 [ arXiv:1111.1009 ] [ INSPIRE ].
63. A. Manohar and H. Georgi, Chiral quarks and the nonrelativistic quark model, Nucl. Phys. B 234 (1984) 189 [ INSPIRE ].
64. A.G. Cohen, D.B. Kaplan and A.E. Nelson, Counting 4π's in strongly coupled supersymmetry, Phys. Lett. B 412 (1997) 301 [ hep-ph/9706275 ] [ INSPIRE ].
65. R. Foadi and M.T. Frandsen, Light Higgs from scalar see-saw in technicolor, arXiv:1212.0015 [ INSPIRE ].
66. R. Foadi, M.T. Frandsen and F. Sannino, 125 GeV Higgs from a not so light technicolor scalar, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 095001 [ arXiv:1211.1083 ] [ INSPIRE ].
67. CMS collaboration, Combined results of searches for the Standard Model Higgs boson in pp collisions at √ s = 7 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 26 [ arXiv:1202.1488 ] [ INSPIRE ].
68. M. Bando, T. Kugo, S. Uehara, K. Yamawaki and T. Yanagida, Is ρ meson a dynamical gauge boson of hidden local symmetry?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54 (1985) 1215 [ INSPIRE ].
69. M. Bando, T. Kugo and K. Yamawaki, Nonlinear realization and hidden local symmetries, Phys. Rept. 164 (1988) 217 [ INSPIRE ].
70. R. Foadi, M.T. Frandsen, T.A. Ryttov and F. Sannino, Minimal walking technicolor: set up for collider physics, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 055005 [ arXiv:0706.1696 ] [ INSPIRE ].
71. M.E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, A new constraint on a strongly interacting Higgs sector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990) 964 [ INSPIRE ].
72. H.S. Fukano, M. Heikinheimo and K. Tuominen, Flavor constraints in a bosonic technicolor model, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 035017 [ arXiv:1106.2433 ] [ INSPIRE ].