Predictive validity of a training protocol using a robotic surgery simulator

Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 48-51

  Culligan, Patrick ^a   Gurshumov, Emil ^a   Lewis, Christa ^a   Priestley, Jennifer ^b   Komar, Jodie ^a   Salamon, Charbel ^a  

^a Atlantic Health   (United States)

^b KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Da Vinci; Morristown Protocol; Robotic simulator; Robotic surgery

Indexed keywords

BLOOD; ROBOTICS; SIMULATORS; TRANSPLANTATION (SURGICAL);

BLOOD LOSS; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DA VINCI; EXPERT AND NOVICES; ROBOTIC SIMULATOR; ROBOTIC SURGERY; SAMPLE SIZES; VIDEO ASSESSMENT;

SURGICAL EQUIPMENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; MALE; OPERATING ROOM; OPERATION DURATION; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; ROBOTIC SURGERY; ROBOTICS; SAMPLE SIZE; SIMULATION; SIMULATOR; SKILL; SURGEON; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURGICAL TRAINING;

ADULT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROBOTICS;

EID: 84892383675     PISSN: 21518378     EISSN: 21544212     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000045     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Wright JD, Ananth CV, Lewin SN, et al. Robotically assisted vs. laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease. JAMA 2013;309(7):689-698.
2. Wright JD, Burke WM, Wilde ET, et al. Comparative effectiveness of robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. J Clin Oncol 2012;30(8):783-791.
3. Barbash GI, Glied SA. New technology and health care costs: the case of robotic assisted surgery. N Engl J Med 2010;363(8):701-704.
4. Griffen FD, Sugar JG. The future of robotics: a dilemma for general surgeons. Bull Am Coll Surg 2013;98(7):9-15.
5. Steinberg PL, Merguerian PA, Bihrle W III, et al. The cost of learning robotic-assisted prostatectomy. Urology 2008;72:1068-1072.
6. Raman JD, Dong S, Levinson A, et al. Robotic radical prostatectomy: operative techniques, outcomes and learning curve. JSLS 2007;11:1.
7. Hung AJ, Zehnder P, Patil MB, et al. Face, content and construct validity of a novel robotic surgery simulator. J Urol 2011;186:1019-1025.
8. Kelly DC, Margules AC, Kundavaram CR, et al. Face, content, and construct validation of the da Vinci Skills Simulator. Urology 2012;79(5):1068-1072.
9. Finnegan KT, Meraney AM, Staff I, et al. da Vinci Skills Simulator construct validation study: correlation of prior robotic experience with overall score and time score performance. Urology 2012;80(2):330-335.
10. Vassiliou MC, Feldman LS, Andrew CG, et al. A global assessment tool for evaluation of intraoperative laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 2005;190:107-113.