Comparison of Validated Assessment Scales and 3D digital fringe projection method to assess lifetime development of wrinkles in men

Skin Research and Technology

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 30-36

  Luebberding, Stefanie ^a   Krueger, Nils ^a   Kerscher, Martina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biophysical measuring methods; Fringe projection method; Men; PRIMOS; Skin aging; Validated assessment scales; Wrinkle assessment

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT SCALE; FRINGE PROJECTION METHOD; MEASURING METHOD; MEN; PRIMOS; SKIN AGING; WRINKLE ASSESSMENT;

DERMATOLOGY; ENGINEERING RESEARCH;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; FOREHEAD; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIFESPAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NORMAL HUMAN; THREE DIMENSIONAL DIGITAL FRINGE PROJECTION METHOD; VALIDATED ASSESSMENT SCALE; WRINKLE; YOUNG ADULT;

BIOPHYSICAL MEASURING METHODS; FRINGE PROJECTION METHOD; MEN; PRIMOS; SKIN AGING; VALIDATED ASSESSMENT SCALES; WRINKLE ASSESSMENT;

ADULT; AGED; AGING; ALGORITHMS; DERMOSCOPY; FOREHEAD; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LIGHTING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTOGRAPHY; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SKIN; SKIN AGING;

EID: 84892373384     PISSN: 0909752X     EISSN: 16000846     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/srt.12079     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. American Society Plastic Surgeons. Cosmetic Surgery National Data Bank. Available from http://www.surgery.org/sites/default/files/ASAPS-2011-Stats.pdf. Accessed July 28, 2012.
2. Lévêque JL. EEMCO guidance for the assessment of skin topography. The European Expert Group on Efficacy Measurement of Cosmetics and other Topical Products. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 1999; 12: 103-114.
3. Dulguerov N, D'Souza A. Update on treatment rationale and options for the ageing face. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011; 19: 269-275.
4. Luebberding S, Alexiades-Armenakas MR. Fractional, nonablative Q-switched 1, 064-nm neodymium YAG laser to rejuvenate photoaged skin: a pilot case series. J Drugs Dermatol 2012; 11: 1300-1304.
5. Sattler G, Callander MJ, Grablowitz D, Walker T, Bee EK, Rzany B, Flynn TC, Carruthers A. Noninferiority of incobotulinumtoxinA, free from complexing proteins, compared with another botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of glabellar frown lines. Dermatol Surg 2010; 36(Suppl. 4): 2146-2154.
6. Task Force Committee for Evaluation of Anti-Aging Function. Guidelines for Evaluation of Anti-Wrinkle Products. J Jpn Cosmet Sci Soc 2007; 31: 423-431.
7. Fitzpatrick RE, Goldman MP, Satur NM, Tope WD. Pulsed carbon dioxide laser resurfacing of photo-aged facial skin. Arch Dermatol 1996; 132: 395-402.
8. Glogau RG. Physiologic and structural changes associated with aging skin. Dermatol Clin 1997; 15: 555-559.
9. Flynn TC, Carruthers A, Carruthers J, Geister TL, Görtelmeyer R, Hardas B, Himmrich S, Kerscher M, De Maio M, Mohrmann C, Narins RS, Pooth R, Rzany B, Sattler G, Buchner L, Benter U, Fey C, Jones D. Validated assessment scales for the upper face. Dermatol Surg 2012; 38 (2 Spec No.): 309-319.
10. Carruthers A, Carruthers J. A validated facial grading scale: the future of facial ageing measurement tools? J Cosmet Laser Ther 2010; 12: 235-241.
11. Jaspers S. Fringe projection for in vivo topometry. In: Wilhelm KP, Elsner P and Berardesca E, eds. Bioengineering of the skin: skin imaging and analysis, 2nd edn. Informa Healthcare: Boca Raton; 2006: 137-147.
12. Akazaki S, Nakagawa H, Kazama H, Osanai O, Kawai M, Takema Y, Imokawa G. Age-related changes in skin wrinkles assessed by a novel three-dimensional morphometric analysis. Br J Dermatol 2002; 147: 689-695.
13. Kaczvinsky JR, Griffiths CEM, Schnicker MS, Li J. Efficacy of anti-aging products for periorbital wrinkles as measured by 3-D imaging. J Cosmet Dermatol 2009; 8: 228-233.
14. Carruthers A, Carruthers J, Hardas B, Kaur M, Goertelmeyer R, Jones D, Rzany B, Cohen J, Kerscher M, Flynn TC, Maas C, Sattler G, Gebauer A, Pooth R, McClure K, Simone-Korbel U, Buchner L. A validated grading scale for crow's feet. Dermatol Surg 2008; 34 (Suppl. 2): S173-S178.
15. Fitzpatrick TB. The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Arch Dermatol 1988; 124: 869-871.
16. Friedman PM, Skover GR, Payonk G, Kauvar ANB, Geronemus RG. 3D in-vivo optical skin imaging for topographical quantitative assessment of non-ablative laser technology. Dermatol Surg 2002; 28: 199-204.
17. Carruthers A, Carruthers J, Hardas B, Kaur M, Goertelmeyer R, Jones D, Rzany B, Cohen J, Kerscher M, Flynn TC, Maas C, Sattler G, Gebauer A, Pooth R, McClure K, Simone-Korbel U, Buchner L. A validated grading scale for forehead lines. Dermatol Surg 2008; 34 (Suppl. 2): S155-S160.
18. Alexiades-Armenakas MR, Dover JS, Arndt KA. The spectrum of laser skin resurfacing: nonablative, fractional, and ablative laser resurfacing. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008; 58: 719-737.
19. Luebberding S, Krueger N, Kerscher M. Lifetime development of facial wrinkles of men and women: using three-dimensional fringe projection method and Validated Assessment Scales. Accepted by Dermatolog Surg.