The IUB, a newly invented IUD: A brief report

Contraception

Volumn 89, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 139-141

  Baram, Ilan ^a   Weinstein, Ariel ^a   Trussell, James ^b,c  

^a OCON Medical ^*  (Israel)

^b PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HULL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Discontinuation; Ease of insertion; Efficacy; Expulsion; Safety; Satisfaction

Indexed keywords

COPPER INTRAUTERINE DEVICE; INTRAUTERINE BALL; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ABDOMINAL CRAMP; ABDOMINAL DISCOMFORT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL TRIAL; DEVICE SAFETY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LOWER ABDOMINAL PAIN; MENSTRUATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; TREATMENT WITHDRAWAL;

DISCONTINUATION; EASE OF INSERTION; EFFICACY; EXPULSION; SAFETY; SATISFACTION;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAUTERINE DEVICES, COPPER; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD;

EID: 84892372858     PISSN: 00107824     EISSN: 18790518     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.10.017     Document Type: Article

References (1)

1. M. Harrison-Woolrych, J. Ashton, and D. Coulter Uterine perforation on intrauterine device insertion: is the incidence higher than previously reported? Contraception 67 2003 53 56