Land surface phenologies and seasonalities using cool earthlight in mid-latitude croplands

Environmental Research Letters

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2013, Pages

  Alemu, W G ^a   Henebry, G M ^a  

^a SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

AMSR E; convex quadratic model; European Russia; microwaves; North America; phenology; remote sensing

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGY; GRAIN (AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT); MICROWAVES; REMOTE SENSING;

AMSR-E; EUROPEAN RUSSIA; NORTH AMERICA; PHENOLOGY; QUADRATIC MODELING;

SURFACE MEASUREMENT;

AGRICULTURAL LAND; AIR TEMPERATURE; AMSR-E; CROP PRODUCTION; DATA SET; IRRADIANCE; LAND SURFACE; OPTICAL DEPTH; PHENOLOGY; SEASONALITY; VEGETATION INDEX; WHEAT;

CANADA; RUSSIAN FEDERATION; UNITED STATES; VOLGA BASIN;

TRITICUM AESTIVUM;

EID: 84892183143     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17489326     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/045002     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. de Beurs K M and Henebry G M 2004 Land surface phenology, climatic variation, and institutional change: analyzing agricultural land cover change in Kazakhstan Remote Sens. Environ. 89 497-509
2. de Beurs K M and Henebry G M 2010 Spatio-temporal statistical methods for modeling land surface phenology Phenological Research: Methods for Environmental and Climate Change Analysis ed I L Hudson and M R Keatley (New York: Springer) chapter 9 pp 177-208
3. de Beurs K M, Wright C K and Heneby G M 2009 Dual scale trend analysis distinguishes climatic from anthropogenic effects on the vegetated land surface Environ. Res. Lett. 4 045012
4. Garrity S R, Bohrer G, Maurer K D, Mueller K L, Vogel C S and Curtis P S 2011 A comparison of multiple phenology data sources for estimating seasonal transitions in deciduous forest carbon exchange Agricult. Forest Meteorol. 151 1741-52
5. Gitelson A A 2004 Wide dynamic range vegetation index for remote quantification of biophysical characteristics of vegetation J. Plant Physiol. 161 165-73
6. Gonsamo A, Chen J M, Wu C and Dragoni D 2012 Predicting deciduous forest carbon uptake phenology by upscaling FLUXNET measurements using remote sensing data Agricult. Forest Meteorol. 165 127-35
7. Grumm R H 2011 The central European and Russian heat event of July-August 2010 Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 92 1285-96
8. Henebry G M and de Beurs K M 2013 Remote sensing of land surface phenology: a prospectus Phenology: An Integrative Environmental Science 2nd edn ed M D Schwartz (New York: Springer) chapter 21 pp 385-411
9. Jones L A and Kimball J S 2011 Daily Global Land Surface Parameters Derived from AMSR-E (available at http://nsidc.org/data/nsidc-0451.html, accessed May 2012)
10. Jones M O, Jones L A, Kimball J A and McDonald K C 2011 Satellite passive microwave remote sensing for monitoring global land surface phenology Remote Sens. Environ. 115 1102-14
11. Kimball J S 2013 personal communication
12. Jones M O, Kimball J S, Jones L A and McDonald K C 2012 Satellite passive microwave detection of North America start of season Remote Sens. Environ. 123 324-33
13. Kovalskyy V, Roy D P, Zhang X Y and Ju J 2012 The suitability of multi-temporal web-enabled Landsat data NDVI for phenological monitoring - a comparison with flux tower and MODIS NDVI Remote Sens. Lett. 3 325-34
14. Li L, Njoku E G, Im E, Chang P S and Germain K St 2004 A preliminary survey of radio-frequency interference over the US in Aqua AMSR-E data IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 42 380-90
15. Liu Y Y, de Jeu R A M, McCabe M F, Evans J P and van Dijk A I J M 2011 Global long-term passive microwave satellite-based retrievals of vegetation optical depth Geophys. Res. Lett. 38 L18402
16. Liu Y Y, van Dijk A I J M, McCabe M F, Evans J P and de Jeu R A M 2013 Global vegetation biomass change (1988-2008) and attribution to environmental and human drivers Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 22 692-705
17. Njoku E G, Ashcroft P, Chan T K and Li L 2005 Global survey and statistics of radio-frequency interference in AMSR-E land observations IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 43 938-47
18. Noormets A 2009 Phenology of Ecosystems Processes (New York: Springer)
19. Owe M, de Jeu R and Walker J 2001 A methodology for surface soil moisture and vegetation optical depth retrieval using the microwave polarization difference index IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote 39 1643-54
20. Richardson A D et al 2010 Influence of spring and autumn phenological transitions on forest ecosystem productivity Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365 3227-46
21. Trenberth K E and Fasullo J 2012 Climate extremes and climate change: the Russian heat wave and other climate extremes of 2010 J. Geophys. Res. 117 D17103
22. Tucker C J 1979 Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation Remote Sens. Environ. 8 127-50
23. USDA FAS 2005 Russia: Agricultural Overview Production Estimates and Crop Assessment Division Report (available at www.fas.usda.gov/pecad/highlights/ 2004/11/rs-18nov04/index.htm, accessed July 2013)
24. USDA FAS 2009 Russia: Current Conditions for 2009/10 Winter Grains Commodity Intelligence Report (available at www.pecad.fas.usda.gov/highlights/ 2009/03/rs-16march2009/index.htm, accessed July 2013)
25. Viña A, Henebry G M and Gitelson A A 2004 Satellite monitoring of vegetation dynamics: sensitivity enhancement by the wide dynamic range vegetation index Geophys. Res. Lett. 31 L04503
26. White M, Nemani R R, Thornton P E and Running S W 2002 Satellite evidence of phenological diffrences between urbanized and rural areas of the eastern United States deciduous broadleaf forest Ecosystems 5 260-77
27. Wu C et al 2012 Interannual and spatial impacts of phenological transitions, growing season length, and spring and autumn temperatures on carbon sequestration: a North America flux data synthesis Glob. Planet. Change 92/93 179-90
28. Zhang X, Friedl M A, Schaaf C B, Strahler A H and Schneider A 2004 The footprint of urban climates on vegetation phenology Geophys. Res. Lett. 31 L12209