A low-cost surgical application of additive fabrication

Journal of Surgical Education

Volumn 71, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 14-17

  Watson, Robert A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

3D printing; additive manufacturing; anatomy education; hepatic surgery; surgical training

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COST; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIGITAL IMAGING AND COMMUNICATIONS IN MEDICINE; EARLY LIVER MODEL; HUMAN; IMAGING SOFTWARE; LIVER STRUCTURE; LIVER SURGERY; LIVER VEIN; MODERN LIVER MODEL; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSICAL HEPATIC MODEL; PHYSICAL MODEL; PILOT STUDY; PORTAL VEIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURGICAL TRAINING; VIRTUAL LIVER MODEL;

3D PRINTING; ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING; ANATOMY EDUCATION; HEPATIC SURGERY; MEDICAL KNOWLEDGE; PATIENT CARE; PRACTICE-BASED LEARNING AND IMPROVEMENT; SURGICAL TRAINING;

COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; GENERAL SURGERY; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INDIVIDUALIZED MEDICINE; LIVER; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, ANATOMIC; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84892180285     PISSN: 19317204     EISSN: 18787452     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.10.012     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. A. Cavalcanti de, A. Martins, and C. Martins History of liver anatomy: mesopotamian liver clay models HPB 15 4 2013 322 323
2. C. Couinaud Lobes et segments hepatique, nots sur l'architecture anatomique et chirurgicale du foie Presse Med 62 1954 709 712
3. J.F. Renz, P.R. Reichert, and J.C. Emond Hepatic arterial anatomy as applied to living-donor and split-liver transplantation Liver Transpl 6 3 2000 May 367 369
4. Y. Mise, K. Tani, and T. Aoki et al. Virtual liver resection: computer-assisted operation planning using a three-dimensional liver representation J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 20 2 2013 157 164
5. A.X. Garg, G.R. Norman, K.W. Eva, L. Spero, and S. Sharan Is there any real virtue of virtual reality?: the minor role of multiple orientations in learning anatomy from computers Acad Med 77 10 suppl 2002 S97 S99
6. Stull AT, Hegarty M, Mayer RE. Anatomy learning with virtual objects. Cognitive shape processing. AAAI 2010 spring symposium. March 22-24, 2010; Stanford, CA, USA; 2010. pp. 39-44.
7. D. Preece, S.B. Williams, R. Lam, and R. Weller Let's get physical: advantages of a physical model over 3D computer models and textbooks in learning imaging anatomy Anat Sci Educ 6 4 2013 216 224
8. M. Kuo, L. Jones, S. Pulos, and R. Hyslop The relationship of molecular representations, complexity, and orientation to the difficulty of stereochemistry problems Chem Educ 9 5 2004 321 327
9. H. Ishii, and B. Ullmer Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people. Bits and Atoms Proc. CHI 1997 234 241
10. F. Rengier, A. Mehndiratta, and H. von Tengg-Kobligk et al. 3D printing based on imaging data: review of medical applications Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 5 4 2010 335 341
11. Nelson C, McAlea K, Gray D. Improvements in SLS part accuracy. Paper presented at the SFF symposium. Austin, Texas, USA; 1995
12. A.G. Valdecasas, A.M. Correas, C.R. Guerrero, and J. Juez Understanding complex systems: lessons from Auzoux's and von Hagens's anatomical models J Biosci 34 6 2009 835 843