Psychological expertise and amicus briefs in the context of competence to face execution

Mental Disorder and Criminal Law: Responsibility, Punishment and Competence

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 205-230

  Schopp, Robert F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892050702     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-84845-7_10     Document Type: Chapter

References (26)

1. Panetti v. Quarterman, (2007) WL 1836653 (U.S.).
2. Brief for Amici Curiae American Psychological Association, American Psychiatric Association, and National Alliance on Mental Illness in Support of Petitioner, 2007 WL 579235 at *1 (hereinafter Associations Brief).
3. Panetti v. Quarterman, (2007) WL 1836653 at *17.
4. Daniel A. Krauss, John McCabe, & Sarah McFadden, Limited Expertise and Experts: Problems with the Continued Use of Future Dangerousness in Capital Sentencing, Chapter 6 in this volume.
5. Robert F. Schopp, Two-Edged Swords, Dangerousness, and Expert Testimony in Capital Sentencing, 30 L. & PSYCHOLOGY REV. 57, 67-68 (sources cited in notes 47-52) (2006).
6. ROBERT F. SCHOPP, COMPETENCE, CONDEMNATION, AND COMMITMENT 41-49 (2001).
7. FEDERAL RULES DECISIONS 183, 282 (Advisory note).
8. ROBERT L. STERN et al., SUPREME COURT PRACTICE 464-68 (8th ed. 2002).
9. Stuart Banner, The Myth of the Neutral Amicus: American Courts and Their Friends, 20 CONST. COMMENT. 111, 119-120 (2003);.
10. Samuel Krislov, The Amicus Curiae Brief: From Friendship to Advocacy, 72 YALE L.J. 694, 694-695 (1963).
11. Roper v. Simmons, 125 S.Ct. 1183, 1196 (2005);.
12. Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304, 319 (2002);.
13. ROBERT NOZICK, PHILOSOPHICAL EXPLANATIONS 363-365 (1981).
14. Ford v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 421-22 (1986) (Powell, J., concurring).
15. Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304, 321 (2002).
16. Roper v. Simmons, 125 S.Ct.1183, 1196 (2005); Atkins, 536 U.S. at 319-320.
17. Atkins, 536 U.S. at 307; Penry v. Lynaugh, 429 U.S. 302, 322-324 (1989).
18. Atkins, 536 U.S. at 318.
19. AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION, DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS 49 (4th ed. Text Revision 2000).
20. Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153, 183-184 (1976) (plurality opinion).
21. Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 227, 237-239 (1976) (Marshall, J., dissenting).
22. JOEL FEINBERG, DOING AND DESERVING 95-118 (1970) (discussing the expressive function of punishment).
23. Ford v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 405-410 (1986).
24. ROBERT L. STERN, et al, SUPREME COURT PRACTICE 2002 supra note 23, at 380-381.
25. PETER ANGELES, DICTIONARY OF PHILOSOPHY 155 (1981).
26. II THE NEW SHORTER OXFORD ENGLISH DICTIONARY 2717 (1993).