Exploring the nature of interprofessional collaboration and family member involvement in an intensive care context

Journal of Interprofessional Care

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 74-75

  Paradis, Elise ^a   Reeves, Scott ^a   Leslie, Myles ^b   Aboumatar, Hanan ^b   Chesluk, Ben ^c   Clark, Philip ^d   Courtenay, Molly ^e   Franck, Linda ^a   Lamb, Gerri ^f   Lyndon, Audrey ^a   Mesman, Jessica ^g   Puntillo, Kathleen ^a   Schmitt, Mattie ^h   Van Soeren, Mary ⁱ   Wachter, Bob ^j   Zwarenstein, Merrick ^k   Gropper, Michael ^j   Kitto, Simon ^l  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b DEPARTMENT OF PATHOLOGY   (United States)

^c AMERICAN BOARD OF INTERNAL MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^h UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

ⁱ Canadian Health Care Innovations   (Canada)

^j UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^k UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^l UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

more..

Author keywords

Clinical outcomes; Comparative; Ethnography; Intensive care; Interprofessional collaboration; Multi site; Patient involvement; Teamwork

Indexed keywords

CANADA; CLINICAL TRIAL; COOPERATION; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; MULTICENTER STUDY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; PUBLIC RELATIONS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; UNITED STATES;

CANADA; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; PATIENT SAFETY; PROFESSIONAL-FAMILY RELATIONS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84891950626     PISSN: 13561820     EISSN: 14699567     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/13561820.2013.781141     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Bosk, C.L., Dixon-Woods, M., Goeschel, C.A., & Pronovost, P.J. (2009). Reality check for checklists. The Lancet, 374, 444-445.
2. Mays, N., & Pope, C. (2000). Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 320, 50-52.
3. Pronovost, P. (2011). Navigating adaptive challenges in quality improvement. BMJ Quality & Safety, 20, 560-563.
4. Reeves, S., Kuper, A., & Hodges, B.D. (2008). Qualitative research methodologies: Ethnography. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 337, 512-514.
5. Reeves, S., Lewin, S., Espin, S., & Zwarenstein, M. (2010). Interprofessional teamwork for health and social care (Vol. 8). New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Rohner, R.P. (1977). Advantages of the comparative method of anthropology. Cross-cultural Research, 12, 117-144.
7. Seale, C. (1999). Quality in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 5, 465-478.
8. Sinuff, T., Cook, D.J., & Giacomini, M. (2007). How qualitative research can contribute to research in the intensive care unit. Journal of Critical Care, 22, 104-111.
9. Stevens, D.P., & Shojania, K.G. (2011). Tell me about the context, and more. BMJ Quality & Safety, 20, 557-559.