Globalization: Pluralist concerns and contexts: Shaping international policy in neuroethics

Scientific and Philosophical Perspectives in Neuroethics

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 321-342

  Blank, Robert H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84891949357     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511676505.018     Document Type: Chapter

References (43)

1. Anderson, J. E. 1990. Public Policy-Making: An Introduction. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
2. Baumgartner, F. R. & Jones, B. D. 1991. Agenda dynamics and policy subsystems. Journal of Politics 53: 1047.
3. Bennett, C. J. 1992. What is policy convergence and what causes it? British Journal of Political Science 21(2): 215–33.
4. Blank, R. H. & Burau, V. 2007. Comparative Health Policy, 2nd edn. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
5. Blank, R. H. & Merrick, J. C. (eds.) 2004. End of Life Decision Making: A Comparative Study. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Bleiklie, I., Goggin, M. L. & Rothmayr, C. (eds.) 2003. Comparative Biomedical Policy: Governing Assisted Reproductive Technologies. London: Routledge Press.
7. Bonnicksen, A. L. 1992. Human embryos and genetic testing: a private policy model. Politics and the Life Sciences 11(1): 53–62.
8. Carney, S. & Geddes, J. 2003. Electroconvulsive therapy. British Medical Journal 326: 43.
9. Chernichovsky, D. 1995. Health system reforms in industrialized democracies: an emerging paradigm. The Milbank Quarterly 73(3): 339–56.
10. Cobb, R.W. & Elder, C.D. 1983. Participation in American Politics: Dynamics of Agenda-Building, 2nd edn. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
11. Cobb, R.W. & Ross, M. H. 1997. Cultural Strategies of Agenda Denial. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
12. Cobb, R.W., Ross, J.-K. & Ross, M. H. 1976. Agenda building as a comparative political process. American Political Science Review 70(1): 126–38.
13. Editorial. 2004. Misplaced faith in ‘Mind Reading’ scans is sure route to injustice. New Scientist 31 July: 3.
14. Farah, M. J. 2005. Neuroethics: the practical and the philosophical. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9(1): 34–40.
15. Field, M. G. 1999. Comparative health systems and the convergence hypothesis: the dialectics of universalismand particularism. In F.D. Powell & A. F.Wessen (eds.) Health Care Systems in Transition: An International Perspective. Sage: Thousand Oaks.
16. Fukushi, T., Sakura, O. & Koizumi, H. 2007. Ethical considerations of neuroscience research: the perspectives on neuroethics in Japan. Neuroscience Research 57: 10–16.
17. Garland, B. 2004. Neuroscience and the law. Professional Ethics Report 17(1): 1–3.
18. Gazzaniga, M. S. 2005. The Ethical Brain. New York: Dana Press.
19. Harrison, S., Moran, M. & Wood, B. 2002. Policy emergence and policy convergence: the case of ‘Scientific-Bureaucratic Medicine’ in the United States and United Kingdom. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 4(1): 1–24.
20. Howlett, M. & Ramish, M. 1995. Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. New York: Oxford University Press.
21. Hyman, S. E. 2007. Neuroethics: at age 5, the field continues to evolve. The Dana Foundation, www.dana.org.
22. Illes, J., Blakemore, C., Hansson, M. G. et al. 2005. International perspectives on engaging the public in neuroethics. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6: 977–81.
23. Illes, J., Rosen, A. C., Huang, L. et al. (2004). Ethical consideration of incidental findings on adult brain MRI in research. Neurology 62: 888–90.
24. Illes, J. & Bird, S. J. 2006. Neuroethics: a modern context for ethics in neuroscience. Trends in Neurosciences 30(10): 1–7.
25. Kingdon, J.W. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, 2nd edn. New York: Longman.
26. Knoppers, B. M. 2000. From medical ethics to ‘Genethics.’ Lancet 356: s38.
27. Macer, D. 1993. No to ‘Genethics’. Nature 365 (9 September): 102.
28. Maddox, J. 1993. New genetics means no ethics. Nature 364(8 July): 97.
29. Martin, P. & Ashcroft, R. 2005. Background paper prepared for the 2005 Wellcome Trust Summer School on ‘Neuroethics’.
30. Mehlman, M. J. & Botkin, J. R. 1998. Access to the Genome: The Challenge to Equality. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
31. Nelkin, D. 1977. Technology and public policy. In I. Spiegal-Rosing & D. DeSolla Price (eds.) Science, Technology and Society. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
32. Perring, C. 1997. Medicating children: the case of ritalin. Bioethics 11(3–4): 228–40.
33. Phillips, H. 2004. Private thought, public property. New Scientist 31 July: 38–41.
34. Pollitt, C. 2002. Clarifying convergence. Striking similarities and durable differences in public management reform. Public Management Review 4(1): 471–92.
35. President's Council on Bioethics. 2003. Beyond Therapy: Biotechnology and the Pursuit of Happiness. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
36. Roskies, A. 2002. Neuroethics for the New Millennium, Commentary. Neuron 35: 21–3.
37. Singer, E. 2004. They know what you want. New Scientist 31 July: 36–7.
38. Spence, S. A., Hunter, M.D. & Harpin, G. 2002. Neuroscience and the will. Current Opinion in Psychiatry 15(5): 519–26.
39. Stone, D. 1999. Learning lessons and transferring policy across time, space and disciplines. Politics 19(1): 51–9.
40. Suzuki, D. & Knudtson, P. 1989. Genethics: The Clash between the New Genetics and Human Values. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41. Timmermans, A. 2001. Arenas as institutional sites for policymaking: patterns and effects in comparative perspective. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 3: 311–37.
42. Wolpe, P. R. 2003. Neuroethics of enhancement. Brain and Cognition 50: 387–95.
43. Wolpe, P. R., Foster, K. R. & Langleben, D. D. 2005. Emerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: promises and perils. American Journal of Bioethics 5(2 March): 39–49.