A knowledge-based approach to the configuration of business process model abstractions

CEUR Workshop Proceedings

Volumn 861, Issue , 2012, Pages 60-74

  Mafazi, Shamila ^a   Mayer, Wolfgang ^a   Grossmann, Georg ^a   Stumptner, Markus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Business process abstraction; Business process management; Process configuration

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACTION MECHANISM; BUSINESS PROCESS; BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT; BUSINESS PROCESS MODEL; CONSTRAINT-BASED; KNOWLEDGE-BASED APPROACH; PROCESS CONFIGURATION; PROCESS TRANSFORMATION;

ENTERPRISE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

ABSTRACTING;

EID: 84891935956     PISSN: 16130073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Bobrik, R., Reichert, M., Bauer, T.: Parameterizable views for process visualization. Tech. rep., Centre for Telematics and Information Technology, University of Twente (2007)
2. Bobrik, R., Reichert, M., Bauer, T.: View-based process visualization. In: Proc. BPM. pp. 88-95. Springer (2007)
3. Cardoso, J., Sheth, A., Miller, J., Arnold, J., Kochut, K.: Quality of service for workflows and web service processes. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 1(3), 281-308 (2004)
4. Ehrig, M., Koschmider, A., Oberweis, A.: Measuring similarity between semantic business process models. In: Proc. APCCM. pp. 71-80. Australian Computer Society (2007)
5. Fahland, D., van der Aalst, W.: Simplifying mined process models: An approach based on unfoldings. In: Rinderle-Ma, S., Toumani, F., Wolf, K. (eds.) Business Process Management, LNCS, Vol. 6896, pp. 362-378. Springer (2011)
6. Gottschalk, F., La Rosa, M.: Process configuration in yawl. In: Hofstede, A.H.M., Aalst, W.M.P., Adams, M., Russell, N. (eds.) Modern Business Process Automation, pp. 313-382. Springer (2010)
7. Gottschalk, F., Wagemakers, T., Jansen-Vullers, M., van der Aalst, W., La Rosa, M.: Configurable process models: Experiences from a municipality case study. In: Advanced Information Systems Engineering, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 5565, pp. 486-500. Springer Berlin /Heidelberg (2009)
8. La Rosa, M., van der Aalst, W., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.: Questionnaire-based variability modeling for system configuration. Software and Systems Modeling 8, 251-274 (2009)
9. Liu, D.R., Shen, M.: Workflow modeling for virtual processes: an order-preserving process-view approach. Information Systems 28, 505-532 (2003)
10. Mayer, W., Killisperger, P., Stumptner, M., Grossmann, G.: A declarative framework for work process configuration. AI EDAM 25(2), 145-165 (2011)
11. Pankratius, V., Stucky, W.: A formal foundation for workflow composition, workflow view definition, and workflow normalization based on petri nets. In: APCCM. pp. 79-88. APCCM '05, Australian Computer Society (2005)
12. Polyvyanyy, A., Smirnov, S., Weske, M.: Process model abstraction: A slider approach. In: EDOC. pp. 325-331 (2008)
13. Polyvyanyy, A., Smirnov, S., Weske, M.: Business process model abstraction. In: Handbook on Business Process Management 1, pp. 149-166. Springer (2010)
14. Smirnov, S., Dijkman, R., Mendling, J., Weske, M.: Meronymy-based aggregation of activities in business process models. In: Parsons, J., Saeki, M., Shoval, P., Woo, C., Wand, Y. (eds.) Conceptual Modeling ER 2010, LNCS, Vol. 6412, pp. 1-14. Springer (2010)
15. Smirnov, S., Reijers, H., Weske, M., Nugteren, T.: Business process model abstraction: a definition, catalog, and survey. Distributed and Parallel Databases 30, 63-99 (2012)