Designing collaborative processes for adaptive management: Four structures for multistakeholder collaboration

Ecology and Society

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2013, Pages

  Pratt Miles, Jennifer D ^a  

^a Meridian Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive management; Collaboration; Collaborative process; Ecosystem management; Natural resource management; Stakeholder

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; DECISION MAKING; FEDERAL SYSTEM; NATURAL RESOURCE; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; STAKEHOLDER;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 84891882012     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17083087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5751/ES-05709-180405     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Allen, C. R., and L. H. Gunderson. 2011. Pathology and failure in the design and implementation of adaptive management. Nebraska Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit Staff Publications Paper 79, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA. [online] URL: http://digitalcommons. unl.edu/ncfwrustaff/79
2. Gates, C., F. Moore Lappé, J. Purdy, and B. Chafin Rash. 1991. NCR dialogue. Collaborative problem solving. National Civic Review 80(2):105-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ncr.4100800203
3. General Services Administration. 2013. When is the Federal Advisory Committee (FACA) applicable? General Services Administration, Washington, D.C., USA. [online] URL: http://www.gsa.gov/portal/content/100794
4. Holling, C. S., editor. 1978. Adaptive environmental assessment and management. Blackburn Press, Caldwell, New Jersey, USA.
5. Lynch, S. 1996. The Federal Advisory Committee Act: an obstacle to ecosystem management by federal agencies? Washington Law Review 71:431.
6. Nyberg, B. 1999. An introductory guide to adaptive management for project leaders and participants. B.C. Forest Service, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
7. Olsson P., C. Folke, and F. Berkes. 2004a. Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social-ecological systems. Environmental Management. 34(1):75-90. http://dx. doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-0101-7
8. Olsson, P., C. Folke, and T. Hahn. 2004b. Social-ecological transformation for ecosystem management: the development of adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape in southern Sweden. Ecology and Society 9(4): 2. [online] URL: http:// www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss4/art2/
9. Schultz, C., and M. Nie. 2012. Decision-making triggers, adaptive management, and natural resources law and planning. Natural Resources Journal 52:443-521. [online] URL: http:// lawlibrary.unm.edu/nrj/52/2/NMN207.pdf
10. Smith, C. B. 2011. Adaptive management on the central Platte River-science, engineering, and decision analysis to assist in the recovery of four species. Journal of Environmental Management 92:1414-1419. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. jenvman.2010.10.013
11. Stankey, G. H., B. T. Bormann, C. Ryan, B. Shindler, V. Sturtevant, R. N. Clark, and C. Philpot. 2003. Adaptive management and the Northwest Forest Plan: rhetoric and reality. Journal of Forestry 101(1):40-46. [online] URL: http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/pubs/journals/pnw_2003_stankey001. pdf
12. Susskind, L., A. E. Camacho, and T. Schenk. 2012. A critical assessment of collaborative adaptive management in practice. Journal of Applied Ecology 49:47-51. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02070.x
13. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Arizona State Office, Tucson Field Office. 2003. Approved Las Cienegas resource management plan and record of decision. BLM/AZ/PL-03-010.
14. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Tucson Field Office, Arizona, USA. [online] URL: http://azmemory.azlibrary.gov/ cdm/singleitem/collection/feddocs/id/231/rec/2
15. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Center. 2012. Adaptive harvest management. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D. C., USA. [online] URL: http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/ CurrentBirdIssues/Management/AHM/AHM-intro.htm
16. U.S. Senate. 1972. Federal Advisory Committee Act. U.S. Senate, Washington, D.C., USA.
17. U.S. Senate. 1973. Endangered Species Act. U.S. Senate, Washington, D.C., USA. [online] URL: http://epw.senate. gov/esa73.pdf
18. U.S. Senate. 1997. The Federal Advisory Committee Act with Amendments and Annotations. U.S. Senate, Washington, D. C., USA. [online] URL: http://www.gsa.gov/portal/ content/100916
19. Walters, C. 1997. Challenges in adaptive management of riparian and coastal ecosystems. Conservation Ecology 1(2): 1. [online] URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol1/iss2/art1/
20. Windle, R., and S. Warren. 2013. Collaborative problem solving: steps in the process. Center for Appropriate Dispute Resolution in Special Education (CADRE), Eugene, Oregon, USA. [online] URL: http://www.directionservice.org/cadre/ section5.cfm#
21. Woodrow, P., and S. Ghais. 1998. Effective collaborative processes on sustainable development and environmental policy: the Boulder principles. Collaborative Decision Resources, Boulder, Colorado, USA. [online] URL: http:// www.cgli.org/positions/IPPDbig.pdf