Understanding adaptive capacity in forest governance: Editorial

Ecology and Society

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2013, Pages

  Keskitalo, E Carina H ^a  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Adaptive capacity; Boreal; Forest; Governance

Indexed keywords

EID: 84891878984     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17083087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5751/ES-05924-180445     Document Type: Editorial

References (24)

1. Adger, W. N. 2000. Social and ecological resilience: are they related? Progress in Human Geography 24(3):347-364 http:// dx.doi.org/10.1191/030913200701540465
2. Beier, C. 2011. Factors influencing adaptive capacity in the reorganization of forest management in Alaska. Ecology and Society 16(1):40. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety. org/vol16/iss1/art40/
3. Berrang-Ford, L., J. D. Ford, and J. Paterson. 2011. Are we adapting to climate change? Global Environmental Change 21(1):25-33 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.09.012
4. Breukers, S. and M. Wolsink. 2007. Wind power implementation in changing institutional landscapes: An international comparison. Energy Policy 35:2737-2750. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.004
5. Clark, M. R., and J. S. Kozar. 2011. Comparing sustainable forest management certifications standards: a meta-analysis. Ecology and Society 16(1):3. [online] URL: http://www. ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art3/
6. Elbakidze, M., P. K. Angelstam, C. Sandström, and R. Axelsson. 2010. Multi-stakeholder collaboration in Russian and Swedish Model Forest initiatives: adaptive governance toward sustainable forest management? Ecology and Society 15(2):14. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/ vol15/iss2/art14/
7. Folke, C., T. Hahn, P. Olsson, and J. Norberg. 2005. Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30:441-473. http://dx.doi. org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
8. Healey, P. 1997. Collaborative Planning, Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. Macmillan, London.
9. Healey, P. 1998. Building institutional capacity through collaborative approaches to urban planning. Environment and Planning 30 (9):1531-1546. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/ a301531
10. Hooghe, L., and G. Marks. 2001. Types of Multi-Level Governance. European Integration online Papers (EIoP) 5 (11). http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2001-011a.htm
11. Johansson, J. 2012. Challenges to the legitimacy of private forest governance-the development of forest certification in Sweden. Environmental Policy and Governance 22 (6):424-436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eet.1591
12. Keskitalo, E. C. H. 2008. Climate Change and Globalization in the Arctic: An Integrated Approach to Vulnerability Assessment. Earthscan Publications, London.
13. Keskitalo, E. C. H., C. Sandström, M. Tysiachniouk, and J. Johansson. 2009. Local consequences of applying international norms: differences in the application of forest certification in northern Sweden, northern Finland, and northwest Russia. Ecology and Society 14(2):1. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art1/
14. Klenk, N. L., M. G. Reed, and S. Mendis-Millard. 2011. A gender-based rapid assessment of adaptive capacity in Canadian model forests. in M. S. Beaulieu, and R. N. Harpelle, editors. Pulp Friction: Communities and the Forest Industry in a Global Perspective. Wilfrid Laurier University Press: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
15. Lundmark, L. J. T., P. Fredman, and K. Sandell. 2010. National parks and protected areas and the role for employment in tourism and forest sectors: a Swedish case. Ecology and Society 15(1):19. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety. org/vol15/iss1/art19/
16. Næss, L. O., G. Bang, S. Eriksen, and J. Vevatne. 2005. Institutional adaptation to climate change: Flood responses at the municipal level in Norway. Global Environmental Change 15:125-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.10.003
17. Næss, L. O., I. Thorsen Norland, W. M. Lafferty, and C. Aall. 2006. Data and processes linking vulnerability assessment to adaption decision-making on climate change in Norway. Global Environmental Change 16(2):221-233. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.01.007
18. O'Brien, K., and R. Leichenko. 2000. Double exposure: Assessing the impacts of climate change within the context of economic globalization. Global Environmental Change 10:221-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(00)00021-2
19. Pinkerton, E. W. and J. Benner. 2013. Small sawmills persevere while the majors close: evaluating resilience and desirable timber allocation in British Columbia, Canada. Ecology and Society 18(2):34. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ ES-05515-180234
20. Plummer, R., B. Crona, D. R. Armitage, P. Olsson, M. Tengö, and O. Yudina. 2012. Adaptive comanagement: a systematic review and analysis. Ecology and Society 17(3):11. http://dx. doi.org/10.5751/ES-04952-170311
21. Press, D. 1998. Local environmental policy capacity: a framework for research. Natural Resources Journal 38:29-52.
22. Smit, B., and J. Wandel. 2006. Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change 16:282-292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.008
23. Smit, B., I. Burton, R. J. T. Klein, J. Wandel. 2000. An Anatomy of Adaptation to Climate Change and Variability. Climatic Change 45(1):223-251. http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/978-94-017-3010-5_12
24. Wellstead, A. M., M. Howlett, and J. Rayner. 2013. The neglect of governance in forest sector vulnerability assessments: structural-functionalism and "black box" problems in climate change adaptation planning. Ecology and Society 18(3):23. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-05685-180323