Evaluation of continuous 24-hour intraocular pressure monitoring for assessment of prostaglandin-induced pressure reduction in Glaucoma

Journal of Glaucoma

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Holló, Gábor ^a,b   Kóthy, Péter ^a   Vargha, Péter ^a  

^a SEMMELWEIS UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^b NONE   (Hungary)

Author keywords

glaucoma; reproducibility; Sensimed triggerfish contact lens sensor; telemetric intraocular pressure measurement; travoprost

Indexed keywords

TRAVOPROST;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTACT LENS; EYE; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPEN ANGLE GLAUCOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SITTING; SLEEP; SUPINE POSITION; TONOMETRY; WAKEFULNESS;

AGED; ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENTS; CLOPROSTENOL; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, AMBULATORY; OCULAR HYPERTENSION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TELEMETRY; TONOMETRY, OCULAR;

EID: 84891868131     PISSN: 10570829     EISSN: 1536481X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31829e5635     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Singh K, Sit AJ. Intraocular pressure variability and glaucoma risk; complex and controversial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011;129: 1080-1081.
2. Liu JH, Weinreb RN. Monitoring intraocular pressure for 24 h. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011;95:599-600.
3. Barkana Y, Anis S, Liebmann J, et al. Clinical utility of intraocular pressure monitoring outside of normal office hours in patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124: 793-797.
4. Prata TS, De Moraes CG, Kanadani FN, et al. Posture-induced intraocular pressure changes: considerations regarding body position in glaucoma patients. Surv Ophthalmol. 2010; 55:445-453.
5. Liu JH, Zhang X, Kripke DF, et al. Twenty-four-hour intraocular pressure pattern associated with early glaucoma-tous changes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:1586-1590.
6. Mosaed S, Liu JH, Weinreb RN. Correlation between office and peak nocturnal intraocular pressures in healthy subjects and glaucoma patients. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139:320-324.
7. Mansouri K, Weinreb RN, Liu JH. Effects of aging on 24-hour intraocular pressure measurements in sitting and supine body positions. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:112-116.
8. Kothy P, Vargha P, Hollo G. Ocuton-S self tonometry vs. Goldmann tonometry; a diurnal comparison study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2001;79:294-297.
9. Realini T, Weinreb RN, Wisniewski S. Short-term repeatability of diurnal intraocular pressure patterns in glaucoma-tous individuals. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:47-51.
10. Ratchford AP, Uppal S, Lakshmanan A, et al. Day-to-day variability in intraocular pressure in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96:967-970.
11. Sensimed Triggerfish. Sensimed Triggerfishs User Manual. Version: ST0001-16.EU.E-C. Lousanne, Switzerland: Sensimed Triggerfish; 2010.
12. Mansouri K, Shaarawy T. Continuous intraocular pressure monitoring with a wireless ocular telemetry sensor: initial clinical experience in patients with open angle glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011;95:627-629.
13. Mansouri K, Weinreb RN. Continuous 24 hour intraocular pressure monitoring for glaucoma with a contact lens sensor- time for a paradigm change. Swiss Med Wkly. 2012;142: w13545.
14. Shaarawy T, Bhartiya Sh. Recent advances in the treatment of glaucoma-the need to maintain pressure over 24 hours. EU Ophthalmic Review. 2011;5:33-37.
15. Mansouri K, Medeiros FA, Tafreshi A, et al. Continuous 24-hour monitoring of intraocular pressure patterns with a contact lens sensor. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130:1534-1539.
16. Leonardi M, Leuenberger P, Bertrand D, et al. First steps toward noninvasive intraocular pressure monitoring with a sensing contact lens. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45: 3113-3117.
17. Leonardi M, Pitchon EM, Bertsch A, et al. Wireless contact lens sensor for intraocular pressure monitoring: assessment on enucleated pig eyes. Acta Ophthalmol. 2009;87:433-437.
18. De Smedt S, Mermoud A, Schnyder C. 24-hour intraocular pressure fluctuation monitoring using an ocular telemetry sensor: tolerability and functionality in healthy subjects. J Glaucoma. 2012;21:539-544.
19. Freiberg FJ, Lindell J, Thederan LA, et al. Corneal thickness after overnight wear of an intraocular pressure fluctuation contact lens sensor. Acta Ophthalmol. 2012;90:e534-e539.
20. Mansouri K, Liu JHK, Weinreb RN, et al. Analysis of continuous 24-hour intraocular pressure patterns in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:8050-8056.
21. Hatanaka M, Babic M, Susanna R Jr. Reproducibility of the mean, fluctuation and IOP peak in the diurnal tension curve. J Glaucoma. 2013;22:390-392.
22. Pajic B, Pajic-Eggspuchler B, Haefliger I. Continuous IOP fluctuation recording in normal tension glaucoma patients. Curr Eye Res. 2011;36:1129-1138.
23. Faschinger C, Mossbock G, Krainz S. Validity and reprodu-cibility of sensor contact lens profiles in comparison to applanation tonometry in healthy eyes [in German]. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilk. 2012;229:1209-1214.
24. Eckert T, Goebel K, Erb C, et al. Continuous monitoring of IOP fluctuation using the Triggerfish in POAG. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; E-poster 5067.