Local climatic adaptation in a widespread microorganism

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 281, Issue 1777, 2014, Pages

  Leducq, Jean Baptiste ^a   Charron, Guillaume ^a   Samani, Pedram ^b   Dubé, Alexandre K ^a   Sylvester, Kayla ^c   James, Brielle ^c   Almeida, Pedro ^d   Sampaio, José Paulo ^d   Hittinger, Chris Todd ^c   Bell, Graham ^b   Landry, Christian R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c USA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSIDADE NOVA DE LISBOA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Climate adaptation; Freeze thaw survival; Global warming; Saccharomyces paradoxus; Temperature dependent fitness

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; CLIMATE CHANGE; CLINE; FITNESS; FREEZE-THAW CYCLE; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; MICROORGANISM; TEMPERATURE TOLERANCE; WARMING; WILD POPULATION; YEAST;

EID: 84891866767     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2472     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Chen IC, Hill JK, Ohlemuller R, Roy DB, Thomas CD. 2011 Rapid range shifts of species associated with high levels of climate warming. Science 333, 1024-1026. (doi:10.1126/Science.1206432)
2. Quintero I, Wiens JJ. 2013 Rates of projected climate change dramatically exceed past rates of climatic niche evolution among vertebrate species. Ecol. Lett. 16, 1095-1103. (doi:10.1111/Ele.12144)
3. Deutsch CA, Tewksbury JJ, Huey RB, Sheldon KS, Ghalambor CK, Haak DC, Martin PR. 2008 Impacts of climate warming on terrestrial ectotherms across latitude. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 6668-6672. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0709472105)
4. Eliason EJ et al. 2011 Differences in thermal tolerance among sockeye salmon populations. Science 332, 109-112. (doi:10.1126/Science.1199158)
5. Willett CS. 2010 Potential fitness trade-offs for thermal tolerance in the intertidal copepod Tigriopus californicus. Evolution 64, 2521-2534. (doi:10.1111/J.1558-5646.2010.01008.X)
6. Maclean IMD, Wilson RJ. 2011 Recent ecological responses to climate change support predictions of high extinction risk. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 12337-12342. (doi:10.1073/Pnas.1017352108)
7. Esteban GF, Finlay BJ. 2010 Conservation work is incomplete without cryptic biodiversity. Nature 463, 293-293. (doi:10.1038/463293c)
8. Baas Becking LGM. 1934 Geobiologie of Inleiding Tot de Milieukunde. The Hague, The Netherlands: Van Stockum & Zoon.
9. Lachance MA. 2004 Here and there or everywhere? Bioscience 54, 884-884. (doi:10.1641/0006-3568 (2004)054[0884:Hatoe]2.0.Co;2)
10. Taylor JW, Turner E, Townsend JP, Dettman JR, Jacobson D. 2006 Eukaryotic microbes, species recognition and the geographic limits of species: examples from the kingdom Fungi. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 361, 1947-1963. (doi:10.1098/ Rstb.2006.1923)
11. Cooper VS, Bennett AF, Lenski RE. 2001 Evolution of thermal dependence of growth rate of Escherichia coli populations during 20,000 generations in a constant environment. Evolution 55, 889-896. (doi:10.1554/0014-3820(2001)055[0889:Eotdog] 2.0.Co;2)
12. Cowen LE, Nantel A, Whiteway MS, Thomas DY, Tessier DC, Kohn LM, Anderson JB. 2002 Population genomics of drug resistance in Candida albicans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 9284-9289. (doi:10. 1073/pnas.102291099)
13. Perron GG, Gonzalez A, Buckling A. 2008 The rate of environmental change drives adaptation to an antibiotic sink. J. Evol. Biol. 21, 1724-1731. (doi:10.1111/J.1420-9101.2008.01596.X)
14. Lenormand T. 2002 Gene flow and the limits to natural selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17, 183-189. (doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02497-7)
15. Belotte D, Curien JB, Maclean RC, Bell G. 2003 An experimental test of local adaptation in soil bacteria. Evolution 57, 27-36. (doi:10.1554/0014-3820(2003)057[0027:Aetola]2.0.Co;2)
16. Whitaker RJ. 2006 Allopatric origins of microbial species. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 361, 1975-1984. (doi:10.1098/Rstb.2006.1927)
17. Gachter E, Weisse T. 2006 Local adaptation among geographically distant clones of the cosmopolitan freshwater ciliate Meseres corlissi. I. Temperature response. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 45, 291-300. (doi:10.3354/Ame045291)
18. Soininen J. 2012 Macroecology of unicellular organisms-patterns and processes. Environ. Microb. Rep. 4, 10-22. (doi:10.1111/J.1758-2229. 2011.00308.X)
19. Telford RJ, Vandvik V, Birks HJB. 2006 Dispersal limitations matter for microbial morphospecies. Science 312, 1015. (doi:10.1126/Science. 1125669)
20. Charron G, Leducq JB, Bertin C, Dube AK, Landry CR. In press. Exploring the northern limit of the distribution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces paradoxus in North America. FEMS Yeast Res. (doi:10.1111/1567-1364.12100)
21. Maganti H, Bartfai D, Xu J. 2012 Ecological structuring of yeasts associated with trees around Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. FEMS Yeast Res. 12, 9-19. (doi:10.1111/j.1567-1364.2011.00756.x)
22. Goncalves P, Valerio E, Correia C, de Almeida JM, Sampaio JP. 2011 Evidence for divergent evolution of growth temperature preference in sympatric Saccharomyces species. PLoS ONE 6, e20739. (doi:10. 1371/journal.pone.0020739)
23. Liti G et al. 2009 Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts. Nature 458, 337-341. (doi:10.1038/nature07743)
24. Sampaio JP, Goncalves P. 2008 Natural populations of Saccharomyces kudriavzevii in Portugal are associated with oak bark and are sympatric with S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 2144-2152. (doi:10.1128/AEM. 02396-07)
25. Sweeney JY, Kuehne HA, Sniegowski PD. 2004 Sympatric natural Saccharomyces cerevisiae and S. paradoxus populations have different thermal growth profiles. FEMS Yeast Res. 4, 521-525. (doi:10.1016/S1567-1356(03)00171-5)
26. Salvado Z, Arroyo-Lopez FN, Guillamon JM, Salazar G, Querol A, Barrio E. 2011 Temperature adaptation markedly determines evolution within the genus Saccharomyces. Appl. Environ. Microb. 77, 2292-2302. (doi:10.1128/Aem.01861-10)
27. Will JL, Kim HS, Clarke J, Painter JC, Fay JC, Gasch AP. 2010 Incipient balancing selection through adaptive loss of aquaporins in natural Saccharomyces cerevisiae populations. PLoS Genet. 6, e1000893. (doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000893)
28. Ordonez A, Williams JW. 2013 Climatic and biotic velocities for woody taxa distributions over the last 16 000 years in eastern North America. Ecol. Lett. 16, 773-781. (doi:10.1111/ele.12110)
29. Kuehne HA, Murphy HA, Francis CA, Sniegowski PD. 2007 Allopatric divergence, secondary contact, and genetic isolation in wild yeast populations. Curr. Biol. 17, 407-411. (doi:10.1016/j.cub. 2006.12.047)
30. Hyma KE, Fay JC. 2013 Mixing of vineyard and oak-tree ecotypes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in North American vineyards. Mol. Ecol. 22, 2917-2930. (doi:10.1111/Mec.12155)
31. Replansky T, Bell G. 2009 The relationship between environmental complexity, species diversity and productivity in a natural reconstructed yeast community. Oikos 118, 233-239. (doi:10.1111/J. 1600-0706.2008.16948.X)
32. R-Developement-Core-Team. 2011 R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. See http://www.R-project.org.
33. Koufopanou V, Hughes J, Bell G, Burt A. 2006 The spatial scale of genetic differentiation in a model organism: the wild yeast Saccharomyces paradoxus. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 361, 1941-1946. (doi:10. 1098/Rstb.2006.1922)
34. Sniegowski PD, Dombrowski PG, Fingerman E. 2002 Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces paradoxus coexist in a natural woodland site in North America and display different levels of reproductive isolation from European conspecifics. FEMS Yeast Res. 1, 299-306.
35. Libkind D, Hittinger CT, Valerio E, Goncalves C, Dover J, Johnston M, Goncalves P, Sampaio JP. 2011 Microbe domestication and the identification of the wild genetic stock of lager-brewing yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 14539-14544. (doi:10.1073/ pnas.1105430108)
36. Schade B, Jansen G, Whiteway M, Entian KD, Thomas DY. 2004 Cold adaptation in budding yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 5492-5502. (doi:10.1091/Mbc. E04-03-0167)
37. Zhang H, Skelton A, Gardner RC, Goddard MR. 2010 Saccharomyces paradoxus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae reside on oak trees in New Zealand: evidence for migration from Europe and interspecies hybrids. FEMS Yeast Res. 10, 941-947. (doi:10.1111/j.1567-1364.2010.00681.x)
38. Johnson LJ, Koufopanou V, Goddard MR, Hetherington R, Schafer SM, Burt A. 2004 Population genetics of the wild yeast Saccharomyces paradoxus. Genetics 166, 43-52. (doi:10.1534/genetics.166.1.43)
39. Takahashi S, Ando A, Takagi H, Shima J. 2009 Insufficiency of copper ion homeostasis causes freeze-thaw injury of yeast cells as revealed by indirect gene expression analysis. Appl. Environ. Microb. 75, 6706-6711. (doi:10.1128/AEM.00905-09)
40. Tulha J, Lima A, Lucas C, Ferreira C. 2010 Saccharomyces cerevisiae glycerol/H{thorn} symporter Stl1p is essential for cold/near-freeze and freeze stress adaptation: a simple recipe with high biotechnological potential is given. Microb. Cell Factories 9, 82. (doi:10.1186/1475-2859-9-82)
41. Tsai IJ, Bensasson D, Burt A, Koufopanou V. 2008 Population genomics of the wild yeast Saccharomyces paradoxus: quantifying the life cycle. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 4957-4962. (doi:10. 1073/pnas.0707314105)