Nudging evolution?

Ecology and Society

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2013, Pages

  Farrell, Katharine N ^a,b   Thiel, Andreas ^a  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Adaptive management; Environmental governance; Institutional change; Institutional fit; Meaning; Oran Young; Protected areas; Social norms; Social ecological systems; Water governance; Wildlife management

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; PROTECTED AREA; WATER MANAGEMENT; WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84891844205     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17083087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5751/ES-05945-180447     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bromley, D. W. 2012. Environmental governance as stochastic belief updating: crafting rules to live by. Ecology and Society 17(3): 14. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-04774-170314
2. Carpenter, S., B. Walker, J. M. Anderies, and N. Abel. 2001. From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what? Ecosystems 4(8):765-781. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s10021-001-0045-9
3. Cox, M. 2012. Diagnosing institutional fit: a formal perspective. Ecology and Society 17(4): 54. http://dx.doi. org/10.5751/ES-05173-170454
4. DeCaro, D. A., and M. K. Stokes. 2013. Public participation and institutional fit: a social-psychological perspective. Ecology and Society 18(4): 40. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ ES-05837-180440
5. Ekstrom, J. A., and O. R. Young. 2009. Evaluating functional fit between a set of institutions and an ecosystem. Ecology and Society 14(2): 16. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety. org/vol14/iss2/art16/
6. Folke, C., L. Pritchard, F. Berkes, J. Colding, and U. Svedin. 1998. The problem of fit between ecosystems and institutions. IHDP Working Paper No. 2, International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change (IHDP), Bonn, Germany.
7. Folke, C., L. Pritchard, F. Berkes, J. Colding, and U. Svedin. 2007. The problem of fit between ecosystems and institutions: ten years later. Ecology and Society 12(1): 30. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art30/
8. Gunderson, L. H., and C. S. Holling, editors. 2002. Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, London, UK.
9. Haller, T., G. Fokou, G. Mbeyale, and P. Meroka. 2013. How fit turns into misfit and back: institutional transformations of pastoral commons in African floodplains. Ecology and Society 18(1): 34. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-05510-180134
10. Herrfahrdt-Pähle, E. In press. Applying the concept of fit to water governance reforms in South Africa. Ecology and Society.
11. Hiedanpää, J. 2013. Institutional misfits: law and habits in Finnish wolf policy. Ecology and Society 18(1): 24. http://dx. doi.org/10.5751/ES-05302-180124
12. Holling, C. S., and G. K. Meffe. 1996. Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conservation Biology 10(2):328-337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/ j.1523-1739.1996.10020328.x
13. Hukkinen, J. I. 2012. Fit in the body: matching embodied cognition with social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 17(4): 30. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-05241-170430
14. Lebel, L., E. Nikitina, C. Pahl-Wostl, and C. Knieper. 2013. Institutional fit and river basin governance: a new approach using multiple composite measures. Ecology and Society 18 (1): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-05097-180101
15. Moss, T. 2012. Spatial fit, from panacea to practice: implementing the EU Water Framework Directive. Ecology and Society 17(3): 2. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-04821-170302
16. Olsson, P., C. Folke, V. Galaz, T. Hahn, and L. Schultz. 2007. Enhancing the fit through adaptive co-management: creating and maintaining bridging functions for matching scales in the Kristianstads Vattenrike Biosphere Reserve, Sweden. Ecology and Society 12(1): 28. [online] URL: http://www. ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art28/
17. Ostrom, E. 2009. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325:419-422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133
18. Petursson, J., P. Vedeld, and A. Vatn. 2013. Going transboundary? An institutional analysis of transboundary protected area management challenges at Mt. Elgon, East Africa. Ecology and Society. 18(4): 28. http://dx.doi. org/10.5751/ES-05729-180428
19. Trosper, R. L. 2005. Emergence unites ecology and society. Ecology and Society 10(1): 14. [online] URL: http://www. ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art14/
20. Vatn, A., and P. Vedeld. 2012. Fit, interplay, and scale: a diagnosis. Ecology and Society 17(4): 12. http://dx.doi. org/10.5751/ES-05022-170412
21. Young, O. 2006. Vertical interplay among scale-dependent environmental and resource regimes. Ecology and Society 11 (1): 27. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/ vol11/iss1/art27/
22. Young, O. R. 2002. The institutional dimensions of environmental change. Fit, interplay, and scale. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
23. Young, O. R. 2008. The architecture of global environmental governance: bringing science to bear on policy. Global Environmental Politics 8(1):14-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/ glep.2008.8.1.14
24. Young, O. R., and A. Underdal. 1997. Institutional dimensions of global change. IHDP Scoping Report, International Human Dimensions Programme of Global Environmental Change (IHDP), Bonn, Germany.
25. Zikos, D., and M. Roggero. 2012. The patronage of thirst: exploring institutional fit on a divided Cyprus. Ecology and Society 18(2): 25. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-05442-180225