Evaluation of a method of predicting lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer based on five pre-operative characteristics

European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

Volumn 172, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 115-119

  Koskas, Martin ^a,b,c,d   Genin, Anne Sophie ^e   Graesslin, Olivier ^f   Barranger, Emmanuel ^g   Haddad, Bassam ^e   Darai, Emile ^c,h   Rouzier, Roman ^d,i  

^a BICHAT HOSPITAL   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^c CENTRE DE RECHERCHE SAINT ANTOINE   (France)

^d Risques Cliniques et Securite en Sante des Femmes et en Sante Perinatale   (France)

^e CENTRE HOSPITALIER INTERCOMMUNAL DE CRÉTEIL   (France)

^f REIMS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^g HÔPITAL LARIBOISIÈRE   (France)

^h HÔPITAL TENON   (France)

ⁱ INSTITUT CURIE   (France)

Author keywords

Algorithm; Endometrial cancer; Lymph node metastasis; Preoperative data

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER STAGING; ENDOMETRIUM CANCER; FEMALE; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARAAORTIC LYMPH NODE; PELVIS LYMPH NODE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; YOUNG ADULT;

ALGORITHM; ENDOMETRIAL CANCER; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; PREOPERATIVE DATA;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADENOCARCINOMA, CLEAR CELL; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; AREA UNDER CURVE; CARCINOSARCOMA; ENDOMETRIAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LYMPH NODE EXCISION; LYMPH NODES; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM GRADING; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; PELVIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84891836635     PISSN: 03012115     EISSN: 18727654     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.10.028     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. R. Siegel, D. Naishadham, and A. Jemal Cancer statistics, 2012 CA Cancer J Clin 62 2012 10 29
2. H. Kitchener, A.M. Swart, Q. Qian, C. Amos, and M.K. Parmar Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomised study Lancet 373 2009 125 136
3. P. Benedetti Panici, S. Basile, and F. Maneschi et al. Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs. no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial J Natl Cancer Inst 100 2008 1707 1716
4. J.M. Cragun, L.J. Havrilesky, and B. Calingaert et al. Retrospective analysis of selective lymphadenectomy in apparent early-stage endometrial cancer J Clin Oncol 23 2005 3668 3675
5. R.E. Bristow, M.L. Zahurak, C.J. Alexander, R.C. Zellars, and F.J. Montz FIGO stage IIIC endometrial carcinoma: resection of macroscopic nodal disease and other determinants of survival Int J Gynecol Cancer 13 2003 664 672
6. S. Bendifallah, M. Koskas, M. Ballester, A.S. Genin, E. Darai, and R. Rouzier The survival impact of systematic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer with the use of propensity score matching analysis Am J Obstet Gynecol 206 2012 500 e1 5011e
7. S. Bendifallah, A.S. Genin, and I. Naoura et al. A nomogram for predicting lymph node metastasis of presumed stage I and II endometrial cancer Am J Obstet Gynecol 207 2012 197 e1 1978e
8. D.M. Larson, K.K. Johnson, S.K. Broste, B.R. Krawisz, and J.J. Kresl Comparison of D&C and office endometrial biopsy in predicting final histopathologic grade in endometrial cancer Obstet Gynecol 86 1995 38 42
9. L.M. Wu, J.R. Xu, H.Y. Gu, J. Hua, E.M. Haacke, and J. Hu Predictive value of T2-weighted imaging and contrast-enhanced MR imaging in assessing myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer: a pooled analysis of prospective studies Eur Radiol 23 2013 435 449
10. A. Bremond, A. Bataillard, and L. Thomas et al. Standards, Options and Recommendations 2000 for the management of patients with endometrial cancer (non-metastatic) (abridged report) Gynecol Obstet Fertil 30 2002 902 916
11. K. Kinkel, R. Forstner, and F.M. Danza et al. Staging of endometrial cancer with MRI: guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Imaging Eur Radiol 19 2009 1565 1574
12. D. Querleu, F. Planchamp, and F. Narducci et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial cancer in France: recommendations of the Institut National du Cancer and the Societe Francaise d'Oncologie Gynecologique Int J Gynecol Cancer 21 2011 945 950
13. M.R. Milam, J. Java, J.L. Walker, D.S. Metzinger, L.P. Parker, and R.L. Coleman Nodal metastasis risk in endometrioid endometrial cancer Obstet Gynecol 119 2012 286 292
14. T. Kamura, H. Yahata, and T. Shigematsu et al. Predicting pelvic lymph node metastasis in endometrial carcinoma Gynecol Oncol 72 1999 387 391
15. J.Y. Lee, D.C. Jung, and S.H. Park et al. Preoperative prediction model of lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer Int J Gynecol Cancer 20 2010 1350 1355
16. S. Kang, W.D. Kang, and H.H. Chung et al. Preoperative identification of a low-risk group for lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer: a Korean gynecologic oncology group study J Clin Oncol 30 2012 1329 1334
17. M. Koskas, K. Bassot, and O. Graesslin et al. Impact of lymphovascular space invasion on a nomogram for predicting lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer Gynecol Oncol 129 2013 292 297
18. S. Kumar, F. Medeiros, and S.C. Dowdy et al. A prospective assessment of the reliability of frozen section to direct intraoperative decision making in endometrial cancer Gynecol Oncol 127 2012 525 531
19. N.R. Abu-Rustum, J.D. Gomez, and K.M. Alektiar et al. The incidence of isolated para-aortic nodal metastasis in surgically staged endometrial cancer patients with negative pelvic lymph nodes Gynecol Oncol 115 2009 236 238
20. Y. Todo, H. Kato, M. Kaneuchi, H. Watari, M. Takeda, and N. Sakuragi Survival effect of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (SEPAL study): a retrospective cohort analysis Lancet 375 2010 1165 1172
21. A. Mariani, G.L. Keeney, G. Aletti, M.J. Webb, M.G. Haddock, and K.C. Podratz Endometrial carcinoma: para-aortic dissemination Gynecol Oncol 92 2004 833 838
22. S.L. Antonsen, L.N. Jensen, and A. Loft et al. MRI, PET/CT and ultrasound in the preoperative staging of endometrial cancer: a multicenter prospective comparative study Gynecol Oncol 128 2013 300 308