A modelling study and optimization of catalytic reduction of NO over CeO2-MnOx (0.25)-Ba mixed oxide catalyst using design of experiments

Environmental Technology (United Kingdom)

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 581-589

  Mousavi, Seyed Mahdi ^a   Salari, Dariush ^a   Niaei, Aligholi ^a   Panahi, Parvaneh Nakhostin ^a   Shafiei, Sirous ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TABRIZ   (Iran)

^b SAHAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

cerium mixed oxide; design of experiments; operation variables; optimization

Indexed keywords

CATALYST ACTIVITY; DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS; MANGANESE OXIDE; OPTIMIZATION;

CATALYTIC PERFORMANCE; CENTRAL COMPOSITE DESIGNS; EFFECTIVE PARAMETERS; GAS HOURLY SPACE VELOCITIES; MIXED OXIDE; MIXED OXIDE CATALYSTS; OPERATION VARIABLES; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY;

REDUCTION;

AMMONIA; BARIUM; CERIUM OXIDE; MANGANESE OXIDE; NITROGEN OXIDE; OXIDE; OXYGEN;

CATALYST; CERIUM; COMPOSITE; NITRIC OXIDE; OPTIMIZATION; OXIDE; REDUCTION; TEMPERATURE EFFECT;

ARTICLE; CATALYST; PREDICTION; RESPONSE SURFACE METHOD; TEMPERATURE;

ADSORPTION; AMMONIA; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CATALYSIS; CESIUM; MANGANESE COMPOUNDS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; NITRIC OXIDE; NITROGEN; OXIDES; OXYGEN; PHASE TRANSITION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 84891832721     PISSN: 09593330     EISSN: 1479487X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2013.837964     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Roy S, Hegde MS, Madras G. Catalysis for NOx abatement. Appl Energ. 2009;86:2283-2297
2. Basfar AA, Fageeha OI, Kunnummal N, Al-Ghamdi S, Chmielewski AG, Licki J, Pawelec A, Tyminski B, Zimek Z. Electron beam flue gas treatment (EBFGT) technology for simultaneous removal of SO2 and NOx from combustion of liquid fuels. Fuel. 2008;87:1446-1452
3. Forzatti P. Present status and perspectives in de-NOx SCR catalysis. Appl Catal A. 2001;222:221-236
4. Zeng Z, Lu P, Li C, Zeng G, Jiang X, ZhaiY, Fan X. Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NO by urea loaded on activated carbon fibre (ACF) and CeO2/ACF: The SCR mechanism. Environ Technol. 2012;33(11):1331-1337
5. Kang M, Park ED, Kim JM, Yie JE. Manganese oxide catalysts for NOx reduction with NH3 at low temperatures. Appl Catal A. 2007;327:261-269
6. Mondragon Rodriguez GC, Kelm K, Saruhan B. H2-selective catalytic reduction of NOx activity and microstructural analysis of new BaTi0.95Pd0.05O3 catalyst. Appl Catal A. 2010;387:173-184
7. Holma T, Palmqvist A, Skoglundh M, Jobson E. Continuous leanNOx reduction with hydrocarbons over dual pore system catalysts. Appl Catal B. 2004;48:95-100
8. Centi G. NO reduction by C3H6 and O2 over supported noble metals part I. Role of the support on the nature of NOx adspecies and their relationship with the catalytic behavior. J Mol Catal A Chem. 2003;204-205:663-671
9. Labhsetwar N, Minamino H, Mukherjee M, Mitsuhashi T, Rayalu S, Dhakad M, Haneda H, Subrt J, Devotta S. Catalytic properties of Ru-mordenite for NO reduction. J Mol Catal A Chem. 2007;261:213-217
10. Nakhostin Panahi P, Salari D, Niaei A, Mousavi SM. NO reduction over nanostructure M-Cu/ZSM-5 (M: Cr, Mn, Co and Fe) bimetallic catalysts and optimization of catalyst preparation by RSM. J Ind Eng Chem. 2013;19(6):1793-1799
11. Lin F, Wu X, Weng D. Effect of barium loading on CuOx-CeO2 catalysts: NOx storage capacity, NO oxidation ability and soot oxidation activity. Catal Today. 2011;175:124-132
12. Furfori S, Russo N, Fino D, Saracco G, Specchia V. NO SCR reduction by hydrogen generated in line on perovskite-type catalysts for automotive diesel exhaust gas treatment. Chem Eng Sci. 2010;65:120-127
13. Amanpour J, Salari D, Niaei A, Mousavi SM, Panahi PN. Optimization of Cu/activated carbon catalyst in low temperature selective catalytic reduction of NO process using response surface methodology. J Environ Sci Health A.2013;48:879-885
14. Mousavi SM, Niaei A, Salari D, Panahi PN, Samandari M. Modeling and optimization of Mn/activate carbon nanocatalysts for NO reduction: Comparison of RSM and ANN techniques. Environ Technol. 2013;34:1377-1384
15. Xu H, Zhang Q, Qiu C, Lin T, Gong M, Chen Y. Tungsten modified MnOx-CeO2/ZrO2 monolith catalysts for selective catalytic reduction of NOx with ammonia. Chem Eng Sci. 2012;76:120-128
16. Wang J, Shen M, Wang J, Cui M, Gao J, Ma J, Liu S. Preparation of FexCe1xOy solid solution and its application in Pd-only three-way catalysts. J Environ Sci. 2012;24: 757-764
17. Hong WJ, Iwamoto S, Inoue M. Direct NO decomposition over a Ce-Mn mixed oxide modified with alkali and alkaline earth species and CO2-TPD behavior of the catalysts. Catal Today. 2011;164:489-494
18. Qi G, Yang RT, Chang R. MnOx-CeO2 mixed oxides prepared by co-precipitation for selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3 at low temperatures. Appl Catal B.2004;51:93-106
19. Qi G. Performance and kinetics study for low-temperature SCR of NO with NH3 over MnOx-CeO2 catalyst. J Catal.2003;217:434-441
20. Eigenmann F, Maciejewski M, Baiker A. Selective reduction of NO by NH3 over manganese-cerium mixed oxides: Relation between adsorption, redox and catalytic behavior. Appl Catal B. 2006;62:311-318
21. Jiang D, Zhang M, Li G, Jiang H. Preparation and evaluation of MnOx-CeO2 nanospheres via a green route. Catal Commun. 2012;17:59-63
22. Hosseinpour V, Kazemeini M, Mohammadrezaee A. A study of the water-gas shift reaction in Ru-promoted Ir-catalysed methanol carbonylation utilising experimental design methodology. Chem Eng Sci. 2011;66: 4798-4806
23. Myers RH, Montgomery DC. Response surface methodology: Process and product optimization using designed experiments. New Jersey: John Wiley; 2002
24. Hosseinpour V, Kazemeini M, Mohammadrezaee A. Optimisation of Ru-promoted Ir-catalysed methanol carbonylation utilising response surface methodology. Appl Catal A.2011;394:166-175
25. Khuri AI, Cornell JA. Response surfaces: Designs and analyses. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1996
26. Hosseini SA, Niaei A, Salari D, Vieira RK, Sadigov S, Nabavi SR. Optimization and statistical modeling of catalytic oxidation of 2-propanol over CuMnmCo2mO4 nano spinels by unreplicated split design methodology. J Ind Eng Chem. 2013;19:166-171
27. Khataee AR, Kasiri MB, Alidokht L. Application of response surface methodology in the optimization of photocatalytic removal of environmental pollutants using nanocatalysts. Environ Technol. 2011;32(15):1669-1684
28. Kasiri MB, Khataee AR. Removal of organic dyes by UV/H2O2 process: Modelling and optimization. Environ Technol. 2012;33(12):1417-1425
29. Xu W, Yu Y, Zhang C, He H. Selective catalytic reduction of NO by NH3 over a Ce/TiO2 catalyst. Catal Commun.2008;9:1453-1457
30. Deeng KD, Mohamed AR, Bhatia S. Process optimization studies of structured Cu-ZSM-5 zeolite catalyst for the removal of NO using design of experiments (DOE). Chem Eng J. 2004;103:147-157
31. Fathinia M, Khataee AR, Zarei M, Aber S. Comparative photocatalytic degradation of two dyes on immobilized TiO2nanoparticles: Effect of dye molecular structure and response surface approach. J Mol Catal A Chem. 2010;333:73-84
32. Metkar PS, Salazar N, Muncrief R, Balakotaiah V, Harold MP. Selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3 on iron zeolite monolithic catalysts: Steady-state and transient kinetics. Appl Catal B. 2011;104:110-126
33. Ojala S, Lassi U, Perämäki P, Keiski RL. Effect of process parameters on catalytic incineration of solvent emissions. J Autom Methods Manage Chem. 2008;1-7