Breech presentation at delivery: A marker for congenital anomaly?

Journal of Perinatology

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 11-15

  Mostello, D ^a   Chang, J J ^b   Bai, F ^b   Wang, J ^b   Guild, C ^a   Stamps, K ^b   Leet, T L ^b  

^a SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

congenital abnormalities; labor presentation; pregnancy outcome; registries

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BREECH PRESENTATION; CHI SQUARE TEST; CHILD; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONGENITAL MALFORMATION; DELIVERY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFANT; LIVE BIRTH; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POPULATION RESEARCH; REGISTER; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCHOOL CHILD; STUDENT T TEST;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BREECH PRESENTATION; CONGENITAL ABNORMALITIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, PREMATURE; INFANT, PREMATURE, DISEASES; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; PREGNANCY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TERM BIRTH; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84891827729     PISSN: 07438346     EISSN: 14765543     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/jp.2013.132     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Cruikshank DP. Breech presentation. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1986; 29: 255-263. (Pubitemid 16100431)
2. Braun FHT, Jones KL, Smith DW. Breech presentation as an indicator of fetal abnormality. J Pediatr 1975; 86: 419-421.
3. Axelrod FB, Leistner HL, Porges RF. Breech presentation among infants with familial dysautonomia. J Pediatr 1974; 84: 107-109.
4. Fianu S, Vaclavinkova V. The site of placental attachment as a factor in the aetiology of breech presentation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1978; 57: 371-372. (Pubitemid 8397540)
5. Brenner WE, Bruce RD, Hendricks CH. The characteristics and perils of breech presentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1974; 118: 700-712.
6. Luterkort M, Persson P, Weldner B. Maternal and fetal factors in breech presentation. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 64: 55-59. (Pubitemid 14075435)
7. Rayl J, Gibson PJ, Hickok DE. A population-based case-control study of risk factors for breech presentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174: 28-32. (Pubitemid 26037684)
8. Axelrod FB, Porges RF, Sein ME. Neonatal recognition of familial dysautonomia. J Pediatr 1987; 110: 946-948. (Pubitemid 17080452)
9. Gimovsky ML, Paul RH. Singleton breech presentation in labor: Experience in 1980. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 143: 733-739. (Pubitemid 12093524)
10. Berendes HW, Weiss W, Deutschberger J, Jackson E. Factors associated with breech delivery. Am J Public Health Health 1965; 55: 708-719.
11. Mazor M, Hagay ZJ, Leiberman JR, Biale Y, Insler V. Fetal malformations associated with breech delivery. Implications for obstetric management. J Reprod Med 1985; 30: 884-886. (Pubitemid 16211314)
12. Alexander GR, Kogan MD, Himes JH. 1994-1996 US singleton birth weight percentiles for gestational age by race, Hispanic origin, and gender. Matern Child Health J 1999; 3: 225-231.
13. Sorensen T, Hasch E, Lange AP. Fetal presentation during pregnancy [Letter]. Lancet 1979; 2: 477.
14. Mickey RM, Greenland S. The impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimation. Am J Epidemiol 1989; 129: 125-137. (Pubitemid 19030705)
15. Hall JE, Kohl SG, O'Brien F, Ginsberg M. Breech presentation and perinatal mortality. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1965; 91: 665-683.
16. Kauppila O. The perinatal mortality in breech deliveries and observations on affecting factors: A retrospective study of 2227 cases. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand (Suppl) 1975; 39: 1-79.
17. Goldberg JD. Routine screening for fetal anomalies: Expectations. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 2004; 31: 35-50. (Pubitemid 38376015)
18. Grandjean H, Larroque D, Levi S. Sensitivity of routine ultrasound screening of pregnancies in the Eurofetus database. The Eurofetus Team. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1998; 847: 118-124. (Pubitemid 28370306)
19. Wren C, Reinhardt Z, Khawaja K. Twenty-year trends in diagnosis of life-threatening neonatal cardiovascular malformations. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2008; 93: F33-F35.
20. Bower C, Rudy E, Callaghan A, Quick J, Nassar N. Age at diagnosis of birth defects. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2010; 88: 251-255.
21. Tanner JP, Salemi JL, Hauser KW, Correia JA, Watkins SM, Kirby RS. Birth defects surveillance in Florida: Infant death certificates as a case ascertainment source. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2010; 88: 1017-1022.
22. Wang Y, Sharpe-Stimac M, Cross PK, Druschel CM, Hwang S. Improving case ascertainment of a population-based birth defects registry in New York state using hospital discharge data. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2005; 73: 663-668. (Pubitemid 41572008)
23. Salemi JL, Tanner JP, Kennedy S, Block S, Bailey M, Correia JA et al. A comparison of two surveillance strategies for selected birth defects in Florida. Public Health Rep 2012; 127: 391-400.
24. Frost F, Starzyk P, George S, McLaughlin JF. Birth complication reporting: The effect of birth certificate design. Am J Public Health 1984; 74: 505-506. (Pubitemid 14137663)
25. Zollinger TW, Przybylski MJ, Gamache RE. Reliability of Indiana birth certificate data compared to medical records. Ann Epidemiol 2006; 16: 1-10. (Pubitemid 41783882)