Large scale agreements via microdebates

CEUR Workshop Proceedings

Volumn 918, Issue , 2012, Pages 366-377

  Gabbriellini, Simone ^a   Torroni, Paolo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Abstract argumentation; Agreement facilitation; Negotiation in online debate; Social net works

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACT ARGUMENTATION; NEGOTIATION IN ONLINE DEBATE; OPEN ENVIRONMENT; SOCIAL NET- WORKS;

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 84891796317     PISSN: 16130073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Mercier, H., Sperber, D.: Why do humans reason? arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34(02) (2011) 57{74.
2. Toni, F., Torroni, P.: Bottom-up argumentation. In Modgil, S., Oren, N., Toni, F., eds.: TAFA 2011: Revised Selected Papers from the First International Workshop on Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation. Volume 7132 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science., Springer (2012) 249{262.
3. Pang, B., Lee, L.: Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Found. Trends Inf. Retr. 2(1-2) (January 2008) 1{135.
4. Liu, B.: Web Data Mining: Exploring Hyperlinks, Contents, and Usage Data (Data- Centric Systems and Applications). Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., Secaucus, NJ, USA (2006).
5. Kim, S.M., Hovy, E.: Automatic identification of pro and con reasons in online reviews. In: Proceedings of the COLING/ACL 2006 Main Conference Poster Ses- sions. (July 2006) 483{490.
6. Yu, B., Kaufmann, S., Diermeier, D.: Exploring the characteristics of opinion expressions for political opinion classification. In: Proceedings of the 2008 inter- national conference on Digital government research. dg.o '08, Digital Government Society of North America (2008) 82{91.
7. Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in non- monotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelli- gence 77(2) (1995) 321 { 357.
8. Baroni, P., Giacomin, M.: Semantics of abstract argument systems. In Simari, G., Rahwan, I., eds.: Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, Springer-Verlag (2009).
9. Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., Moon, S.: What is Twitter, a social network or a news media? In: WWW '10: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web, New York, NY, USA, ACM (2010) 591{600.
10. Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., Tseng, B.: Why we twitter: understanding mi- croblogging usage and communities. In: Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 workshop on Web mining and social network analysis, New York, NY, USA, ACM (2007) 56{65.
11. Huberman, B.A., Romero, D.M., Wu, F.: Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope. First Monday 14(1) (January 2009).
12. DeVoe, K.M.: Bursts of information: Microblogging. The Reference Librarian 50(2) (2009) 212{214.
13. Bruns, A., Burgess, J.E.: The use of twitter hashtags in the formation of ad hoc publics. In: 6th European Consortium for Political Research General Conference, University of Iceland, Reykjavik (August 2011).
14. Romero, D.M., Meeder, B., Kleinberg, J.: Differences in the mechanics of informa- Tion di-usion across topics: idioms, political hashtags, and complex contagion on twitter. In: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web. WWW '11, New York, NY, USA, ACM (2011) 695{704.
15. Huang, J., Thornton, K.M., Efthimiadis, E.N.: Conversational tagging in twitter. In: Proceedings of the 21st ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia. HT '10, New York, NY, USA, ACM (2010) 173{178.
16. Egly, U., Gaggl, S., Woltran, S.: ASPARTIX: Implementing argumentation frame- works using answer-set programming. In Garcia de la Banda, M., Pontelli, E., eds.: ICLP: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Logic Programming. Volume 5366 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer (2008) 734{738.
17. Wilensky, U.: Netlogo. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Mod- eling, Northwestern University. Evanston, IL. (1999).