The use of dermal substitutes in burn surgery: Acute phase

Wound Repair and Regeneration

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 1-2

  Greenhalgh, David G ^a,b  

^a SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHONDROITIN 6 SULFATE; COLLAGEN TYPE 1; SILICONE;

BODY FAT; BODY SURFACE; BURN; BURN INFECTION; DERMAL SUBSTITUTE; DERMIS; EDITORIAL; EPIDERMIS; FASCIA; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCAR FORMATION; SKIN AUTOGRAFT; SKIN GRAFT; SKIN SURGERY; SKIN TRANSPLANTATION; SURGEON; SURVIVAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACUTE DISEASE; BURNS; CICATRIX; ELASTICITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; SKIN, ARTIFICIAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 84891783578     PISSN: 10671927     EISSN: 1524475X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/wrr.12120     Document Type: Editorial

References (6)

1. Shahrokhi S, Arno A, Jeschke MG,. The use of dermal substitutes in burn surgery: acute phase. Wound Repair Regen 2014; 22: 14-22.
2. Gallico GG, O'Connner NE, Compton CC, Kehinde O, Green H,. Permanent coverage of large burn wounds with autologous cultured human epithelium. N Engl J Med 1984; 311: 448-511.
3. Yannas IV, Burke JF,. Design of an artificial skin. I. Basic design principles. J Biomed Mater Res 1980; 1: 65-81.
4. Heimbach D, Luterman A, Burke J, Cram A, Herndon D, Hunt J, et al. Artificial dermis for major burns. A multi-center randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 1988; 208: 313-320.
5. Archer SB, Henke A, Greenhalgh DG, Warden GD,. The use of sheet autografts to cover patients with extensive burns. J Burn Care Rehabil 1998; 19: 33-38.
6. Boyce ST, Goretsky MJ, Greenhalgh DG, Kagan RJ, Rieman MT, Warden GD,. Comparative assessment of cultured skin substitutes and native skin autograft for the treatment of full-thickness burns. Ann Surg 1995; 222: 743-752.