Erratum: A Critique of Gunderson's Views of DSM-5: Commentary on 'Seeking Clarity for Future Revisions of the Personality Disorders in DSM-5 (Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment 4:4 (379-380) DOI: 10.1037/per0000050);A critique of Gunderson's views of DSM-5: Commentary on "seeking clarity for future revisions of the personality disorders in DSM-5"

Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 379-380

  Clark, Lee Anna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVISORY COMMITTEE; CLASSIFICATION; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; HUMAN; NOTE; PERSONALITY DISORDER;

ADVISORY COMMITTEES; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; HUMANS; PERSONALITY DISORDERS;

EID: 84891753415     PISSN: 19492715     EISSN: 19492723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/per0000067     Document Type: Erratum

References (10)

1. American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author
2. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.; text rev.). Washington, DC: Author
3. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author
4. Bernstein, D. P., Iscan, C., Maser, J., Boards of Directors of the Association for Research in Personality Disorders, & International Society for the Study of Personality Disorders. (2007). Opinions of personality disorder experts regarding the DSM-IV personality disorders classification system. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21, 536-551. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2007.21.5.536
5. Clark, L. A., Livesley, W. J., & Morey, L. (1997). Personality disorder assessment: The challenge of construct validity. Journal of Personality Disorders, 11, 205-231. doi:10.1521/pedi.1997.11.3.205
6. Gunderson, J. G. (2013). Seeking clarity for future revisions of the personality disorders in DSM-5-!-!-. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 4, 368-376. doi:10.1037/per0000026
7. Haslam, N. (2011). The latent structure of personality and psychopathology: A review of trends in taxometric research. The Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice: Objective Investigations of Controversial and Unorthodox Claims in Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry, and Social Work, 8, 17-29
8. Markon, K. E., Krueger, R. F., & Watson, D. (2005). Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personality: An integrative hierarchical approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 139-157. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.139
9. Morey, L. C., & Skodol, A. E. (2013). Convergence between DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 diagnostic models for personality disorder: Evaluation of strategies for establishing diagnostic thresholds. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 19, 179-193
10. O'Connor, B. P. (2002). The search for dimensional structure differences between normality and abnormality: A statistical review of published data on personality and psychopathology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 962-982. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.962