Variation among sows in response to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome

Journal of Animal Science

Volumn 92, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 95-105

  Rashidi, H ^a   Mulder, H A ^a   Mathur, P ^b   Van Arendonk, J A M ^a   Knol, E F ^b  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b TOPIGS Research Center IPG   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Disease resistance; Outbreak detection; Pig; Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome; Reproduction; Tolerance to infection

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ARTERIVIRUS; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CANADA; EPIDEMIC; FEMALE; GENETICS; LIVE BIRTH; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PORCINE REPRODUCTIVE AND RESPIRATORY SYNDROME; REPRODUCIBILITY; REPRODUCTION; STATISTICAL MODEL; SWINE; VIROLOGY;

ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ANIMALS; CANADA; DISEASE OUTBREAKS; FEMALE; LINEAR MODELS; LIVE BIRTH; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PORCINE REPRODUCTIVE AND RESPIRATORY SYNDROME; PORCINE RESPIRATORY AND REPRODUCTIVE SYNDROME VIRUS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; REPRODUCTION; SWINE;

EID: 84891649199     PISSN: 00218812     EISSN: 15253163     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2527/jas.2013-6889     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Akaike, H. 1973. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: B. N. Petrov and F. Csaki, editors, Proc. 2nd Int. Symp. Information Theory. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, Hungary. p. 267-281.
2. Batista, L., C. Pijoan, S. Dee, M. Olin, T. Molitor, H. S. Joo, Z. G. Xiao, and M. Murtaugh. 2004. Virological and immunological responses to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in a large population of gilts. Can. J. Vet. Res. 68:267-273.
3. Bergsma, R., and S. Hermesch. 2012. Exploring breeding opportunities for reduced thermal sensitivity of feed intake in the lactating sow. J. Anim. Sci. 90:85-98.
4. Boddicker, N., E. H. Waide, R. R. R. Rowland, J. K. Lunney, D. J. Garrick, J. M. Reecy, and J. C. M. Dekkers. 2012. Evidence for a major QTL associated with host response to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus challenge. J. Anim. Sci. 90:1733-1746.
5. Calus, M. P. L., A. F. Groen, and G. de Jong. 2002. Genotype environment interaction for protein yield in Dutch dairy cattle as quantified by different models. J. Dairy Sci. 85:3115-3123.
6. Doeschl-Wilson, A. B., B. Villanueva, and I. Kyriazakis. 2012. The first step towards genetic selection for host tolerance to infectious pathogens: Obtaining the tolerance phenotype through group estimates. Front. Genet. 3:265-275.
7. Falconer, D. S. 1952. The problem of environment and selection. Am. Nat. 86:293-298.
8. Gilmour, A. R., B. J. Gogel, B. R. Cullis, and R. Thompson. 2009 ASReml user guide release 3.0. VSN International, Hemel Hempstead, UK.
9. Houben, S., K. Vanreeth, and M. B. Pensaert. 1995. Pattern of infection with the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus on swine farms in Belgium. J. Vet. Med. B 42:209-215.
10. Huang, Y. W., and X. J. Meng. 2010. Novel strategies and approaches to develop the next generation of vaccines against porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV). Virus Res. 154:141-149.
11. Kause, A. 2011. Genetic analysis of tolerance to infections using random regressions: A simulation study. Genet. Res. 93:291-302.
12. Kause, A., and J. Odegard. 2012. The genetic analysis of tolerance to infections: A review. Front. Genet. 3:262-270.
13. Kause, A., S. van Dalen, and H. Bovenhuis. 2012. Genetics of ascites resistance and tolerance in chicken: A random regression approach. G3 (Bethesda) 2:527-535.
14. Lewis, C. R. G., T. Ait-Ali, A. Wilson, D. G. Westcott, J. P. Frossard, B. Naidu, M. A. Mellencamp, M. Torremorell, T. Drew, S. C. Bishop, and A. L. Archibald. 2010. Effects of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection on the performance of pregnant gilts and growing pigs. Anim. Prod. Sci. 50:890-896.
15. Lewis, C. R. G., M. Torremorell, L. Galina-Pantoja, and S. C. Bishop. 2009. Genetic parameters for performance traits in commercial sows estimated before and after an outbreak of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome. J. Anim. Sci. 87:876-884.
16. Li, L., and S. Hermesch. 2012. Genotypes differ in their response to variation in environments experienced by pigs on farm. AGBU Pig Genetics Workshop, University of New England, Armidale. p. 53-60.
17. Lillehammer, M., J. Odegard, and T. H. E. Meuwissen. 2009. Reducing the bias of estimates of genotype by environment interactions in random regression sire models. Genet. Sel. Evol. 41:30-36.
18. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. 1st ed. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
19. Mckay, R. M. 1993. Preweaning losses of piglets as a result of index selection for reduced backfat thickness and increased growthrate. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 73:437-442.
20. Murtaugh, M. P., and M. Genzow. 2011. Immunological solutions for treatment and prevention of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS). Vaccine 29:8192-8204.
21. Murtaugh, M. P., and R. R. R. Rowland. 2004. Special issue-Immunology and immunopathology of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS)-Preface. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 102:105.
22. Nodelijk, G., M. C. M. de Jong, L. A. M. G. van Leengoed, G. Wensvoort, J. M. A. Pol, P. J. G. M. Steverink, and J. H. M. Verheijden. 2001. A quantitative assessment of the effectiveness of PRRSV vaccination in pigs under experimental conditions. Vaccine 19:3636-3644.
23. Raberg, L., D. Sim, and A. F. Read. 2007. Disentangling genetic variation for resistance and tolerance to infectious diseases in animals. Science 318:812-814.
24. Ravagnolo, O., and I. Misztal. 2000. Genetic component of heat stress in dairy cattle, parameter estimation. J. Dairy Sci. 83:2126-2130.
25. Read, A. F., A. L. Graham, and L. Raberg. 2008. Animal defenses against infectious agents: Is damage control more important than pathogen control? PLoS Biol. 6:2638-2641.
26. Rowland, R., J. Lunney, and J. Dekkers. 2012. Control of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) through genetic improvements in disease resistance and tolerance. Front. Genet. 3:260-265.
27. Simms, E. L. 2000. Defining tolerance as a norm of reaction. Evol. Ecol. 14:563-570.
28. Simms, E. L., and J. Triplett. 1994. Costs and benefits of plant-responses to diseaseresistance and tolerance. Evolution 48:1973-1985.
29. van Tienderen, P. H., and H. P. Koelewijn. 1994. Selection on reaction norms, genetic correlations and constraints. Genet. Res. 64:115-125.
30. Vincent, A. L., B. J. Thacker, P. G. Halbur, M. F. Rothschild, and E. L. Thacker. 2006. An investigation of susceptibility to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus between two genetically diverse commercial lines of pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 84:49-57.
31. Visscher, P. M., and M. E. Goddard. 1993. Fixed and random contemporary groups. J. Dairy Sci. 76:1444-1454.
32. Zimmerman, J., D. A. Benfield, M. P. Murtaugh, F. Osorio, G. W. Stevenson, and M. Torremorell. 2006. Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (Porcine Arterivirus). In: B. E. Straw, J. J. Zimmerman, S. D'Allaire, and D. J. Taylor, editors, Diseases of swine. 9th ed. Blackwell Publishing, Ames, IA. p. 387-417.