Examining porous bio-active glass as a potential osteo-odonto- keratoprosthetic skirt material

Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1217-1227

  Huhtinen, Reeta ^a   Sandeman, Susan ^b   Rose, Susanna ^b   Fok, Elsie ^b   Howell, Carol ^b   Fröberg, Linda ^c   Moritz, Niko ^a   Hupa, Leena ^c   Lloyd, Andrew ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRIGHTON   (United Kingdom)

^c ÅBO AKADEMI UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE SUBSTITUTES; CYTOKINE PRODUCTION; INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE; NEGATIVE CONTROL; PARTICLE SIZE RANGES; POROUS GLASS MATERIALS; POROUS STRUCTURES; TISSUE IN-GROWTH;

CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; DISSOLUTION; EXPERIMENTS; POROSITY; TISSUE;

GLASS;

BIOACTIVE GLASS; GLASS; INTERLEUKIN 6; INTERLEUKIN 8; OXIDE; POROUS POLYMER; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; BIOGLASS; CYTOKINE; TISSUE SCAFFOLD; BONE PROSTHESIS; CERAMICS;

AQUEOUS HUMOR; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA CELL; CORNEA IMPLANT; CYTOKINE PRODUCTION; DISSOLUTION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; IN VITRO STUDY; INFLAMMATION; KERATOPROSTHESIS; OSTEO ODONTO KERATOPROSTHESIS; PARTICLE SIZE; PH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS MATERIAL; SKIRT MATERIAL; TISSUE GROWTH; BONE PROSTHESIS; CELL PROLIFERATION; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; CORNEA TRANSPLANTATION; CULTURE TECHNIQUE; CYTOLOGY; DRUG EFFECT; EQUIPMENT; MATERIALS TESTING; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; POROSITY; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES; DEVICES; DRUG EFFECTS; PHARMACOLOGY; TISSUE SCAFFOLD;

BONE SUBSTITUTES; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELLS, CULTURED; CERAMICS; CORNEAL KERATOCYTES; CORNEAL TRANSPLANTATION; CYTOKINES; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; POROSITY; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 84891647065     PISSN: 09574530     EISSN: 15734838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10856-013-4881-x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Chirila TV, et al. Artificial cornea. Prog Polym Sci. 1998;23: 447-73.
2. Langefeld S, Kompa S, Redbrake C, Brenman K, Kirchhof B, Schrage NF. Aachen keratoprosthesis as temporary implant for combined vitreoretinal surgery and keratoplasty: report on 10 clinical applications. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000; 238:722-6.
3. Chirila TV. An overview of the development of artificial corneas with porous skirts and the use of PHEMA for such an application. Biomaterials. 2001;22:3311-7.
4. Kim MK, Lee JL, Wee WR, Lee JH. Seoul-type keratoprosthesis. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:761-6.
5. Bruin P, Meeuwsen EAJ, van Andel MV, Worst JGF, Pennings AJ. Autoclavable highly cross-linked polyurethane networks in ophthalmology. Biomaterials. 1993;14:1089-97.
6. Pruitt LA. Fluorocarbon polymers in biomedical engineering. Encycl Mat Sci Tech. 2008;32:16-21.
7. Renard G, Cetinel B, Legeais JM, Savoldelli M, Durand J, Pouliquen Y. Incorporation of a fluorocarbon polymer implanted at the posterior surface of the rabbit cornea. J Biomed Mat Res. 1996;31:193-9.
8. Caiazza S, Fanizza C, Mazziotti I, Pintucci S, Tomaino MA. Light and scanning electron microscopy evaluation of the Dacron felt as the haptic part of an improved keratoprosthesis. An in vitro and in vivo study. Clin Mat. 1988;3:33-40.
9. Trinkaus-Randall V, Capecchi J, Sammon L, Gibbons D, Leibowitz HM, Franzblau C. In vitro evaluation of fibroplasia in a porous polymer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1990;31:1321-6.
10. Trinkaus-Randall V, Banwatt R, Capecchi J, Leibowitz HM, Franzblau C. In vivo fibroplasia of a porous polymer in the cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32:3245-51.
11. Kain HL. The development of the silicone-carbon keratoprothesis. Refract Corneal Surg. 1993;9:209-10.
12. Ciolino JB, Dohlman CH. Biologic keratoprosthesis materials. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2009;49(1):1-9.
13. Miyashita H, et al. Collagen-immobilized poly(vinyl alcohol) as an artificial cornea scaffold that supports a stratified corneal epithelium. J Biomed Mat Res. 2006;76:56-63.
14. Xie RZ, Sweeney DF, Beumer GJ, Johnson G, Griesser HJ, Steele JG. Effects of biologically modified surfaces of synthetic lenticules on corneal epithelialization in vivo. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1997;25(Suppl):46-9.
15. Kobayashi H, Ikada Y. Corneal cell adhesion and proliferation on hydrogel sheets bound with cell-adhesive proteins. Curr Eye Res. 1991;10:899-908.
16. Pettit DK, Horbett TA, Hoffman AS, Chan KY. Quantitation of rabbit corneal epithelial cell outgrowth on polymeric substrates in vitro. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1990;31:2269-77.
17. Ohji M, Mandarino L, SundarRaj N, Thoft RA. Corneal epithelial cell attachment with endogenous laminin and fibronectin. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:2487-92.
18. Strampelli B. Osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis. Ann Ottalmol Clin Ocul. 1963;89:1039.
19. Ricci R, Pecorella I, Ciardi A, Della RC, Di Tondo U, Marchi V. Strampelli's osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis. Clinical and histological long-term features of three prostheses. British J Ophthalmol. 1992;76:232-4.
20. Karlsson KH, Ylanen H, Aro H. Porous bone implants. Ceram Int. 2000;26:897-900.
21. Zhang D, Vedel E, Hupa L, Aro HT. Predicting physical and chemical properties of bio-active glasses from chemical composition. Part III. In vitro reactivity of glasses. Glass Tech Eur J Glass Sci Tech. 2009;50(1):1-8.
22. Hench LL, Andersson O . "Bio-active glasses" an introduction to bioceramics. In: Hench LL, Wilson J, editors. Advanced series in ceramics - vol. 1. Singapore: World Scientific; 1993.
23. Linnola RJ, Happonen RP, Andersson O H, Vedel E, Yli-Urpo AU, Krause U, Laatikainen L. Titanium and bio-active glass- ceramic coated titanium as materials for keratoprosthesis. Exp Eye Res. 1996;63:471-8.
24. Arstila H, Vedel E, Hupa L, Hupa M. Predicting physical and chemical properties of bio-active glasses from chemical composition. Part II. Devitrification characteristics. Glass Tech Eur J Glass Sci Tech. 2008;49(6):251-9.
25. Arstila H, Vedel E, Hupa L, Hupa M. Predicting physical and chemical properties of bio-active glasses from chemical composition. Part 2: Devitrification characteristics. Glass Tech Eur J Glass Sci Tech. 2009;49(6):260-5.
26. Lentner C. Geigy scientific tables, vol. 1. Units of measurements, Body fluid, Composition of body, and Nutrition. West Galdwell: Giba-Geigy; 1981.
27. Viitala R, Franklin V, Green D, Liu C, Lloyd A, Tighe B. Towards a synthetic osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis. Acta Biomater. 2009;5:438-52.
28. Zhang D, Lepparanta O, Munukka E, Ylanen H, Viljanen MK, Eerola E, Hupa M, Hupa L. Antibacterial effects and dissolution behavior of six bio-active glasses. J Biomed Mat Res. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.32564.
29. Hoppe A, Guldal NS, Boccaccini AR. A review of the biological response to ionic dissolution products from bio-active glasses and glass-ceramics. Biomaterials. 2011;32:2757-74.