Effect of H2S/HCl on the removal of elemental mercury in syngas over CeO2-TiO2

Chemical Engineering Journal

Volumn 241, Issue , 2014, Pages 131-137

  Hou, Wenhui ^a   Zhou, Jinsong ^a   Qi, Pan ^a   Gao, Xiang ^a   Luo, Zhongyang ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

CeO2 TiO2; Hydrogen sulfide; Mercury; Removal; Syngas

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE ADSORPTION; ELEMENTAL MERCURY; EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONS; REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES; REMOVAL MECHANISM; SYN-GAS; TEMPERATURE-PROGRAMMED DECOMPOSITION; TIO;

ACTIVATED CARBON; HYDROGEN SULFIDE; MERCURY (METAL); OXYGEN; PHOTOELECTRONS; REMOVAL; SORBENTS; SYNTHESIS GAS; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; X RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY;

DESULFURIZATION;

EID: 84891636701     PISSN: 13858947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.12.047     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. 2 materials. Energy Fuels 2013, 27:4832-4839.
2. Wang S., Zhang L., Zhao B., Meng Y., Hao J. Mitigation potential of mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants in China. Energy Fuels 2012, 26:4635-4642.
3. Wilcox J., Rupp E., Ying S.C., Lim D., Negreira A.S., Kirchofer A., Feng F., Lee K. Mercury adsorption and oxidation in coal combustion and gasification processes. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2012, 90-91:4-20.
4. 2 catalyst. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 219:319-326.
5. Zhang B., Liu J., Zhang J., Zheng C., Chang M. Mercury oxidation mechanism on Pd(100) surface from first-principles calculations. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 237:344-351.
6. Pavlish J.H., Sondreal E.A., Mann M.D., Olson E.S., Galbreath K.C., Laudal D.L., Benson S.A. Status review of mercury control options for coal-fired power plants. Fuel Process. Technol. 2003, 82:89-165.
7. Liu S., Yan N., Liu Z., Qu Z., Wang H.P., Chang S., Miller C. Using bromine gas to enhance mercury removal from flue gas of coal-fired power plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41:1405-1412.
8. Zhang H., Zhao J.T., Fang Y.T., Huang J.J., Wang Y. Catalytic oxidation and stabilized adsorption of elemental mercury from coal-derived fuel gas. Energy Fuels 2012, 26:1629-1637.
9. 2 catalysts for catalytic oxidation of elemental mercury in low-rank coal combustion flue gas. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45:7394-7400.
10. Liu W., Vidic R.D., Brown T.D. Impact of flue gas conditions on mercury uptake by sulfur-impregnated activated carbon. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34:154-159.
11. Wu S., Azhar Uddin M., Sasaoka E. Characteristics of the removal of mercury vapor in coal derived fuel gas over iron oxide sorbents. Fuel 2006, 85:213-218.
12. 2S to sulphur. Solid State Sci. 2010, 12:996-1001.
13. 3: confirmation of Ce-O-Ti active sites. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46:9600-9605.
14. 2 catalyst for catalytic oxidation of elemental mercury at low flue gas temperatures. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2012, 111:381-388.
15. 2 sorbents for removal of elemental mercury from syngas. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47:10056-10062.
16. x with ammonia. Catal. Today 2010, 153:77-83.
17. 3. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 174:734-739.
18. Zhang L., Zhuo Y.Q., Du W., Tao Y., Chen C.H., Xu X.C. Hg removal characteristics of noncarbon sorbents in a fixed-bed reactor. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51:5292-5298.
19. Presto A.A., Granite E.J. Survey of catalysts for oxidation of mercury in flue gas. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40:5601-5609.
20. 0 removal from coal derived fuel gas: effect of hydrogen chloride. Fuel 2008, 87:467-474.
21. 2 nanocomposite in simulated coal-fired flue gas. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 170:512-517.
22. Ozaki M., Uddin M.A., Sasaoka E., Wu S. Temperature programmed decomposition desorption of the mercury species over spent iron-based sorbents for mercury removal from coal derived fuel gas. Fuel 2008, 87:3610-3615.