Person identification from text and speech genre samples

EACL 2009 - 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 336-344

  Goldstein Stewart, Jade ^a   Winder, Ransom ^b   Sabin, Roberta Evans ^c  

^a ARMED FORCES INSTITUTE OF PATHOLOGY   (United States)

^b MITRE CORPORATION   (United States)

^c LOYOLA UNIVERSITY MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUDIO SAMPLES; CROSS VALIDATION; GROUP DISCUSSIONS; PERSON IDENTIFICATION; TEXT GENRE;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

EID: 84891622601     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1609067.1609104     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Naomi S. Baron. 2003. Why email looks like speech. In J. Aitchison and D. M. Lewis, editors, New Media Language. Routledge, London, UK.
2. Douglas Biber. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
3. Leo Breiman. 2001. Random forests. Technical Report for Version 3, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
4. Rafael A. Calvo, Jae-Moon Lee, and Xiaobo Li. 2004. Managing content with automatic document classification. Journal of Digital Information, 5(2).
5. Corinna Cortes and Vladimir Vapnik. 1995. Support vector networks. Machine Learning, 20(3): 273-297.
6. Nikolas Coupland, Justine Coupland, Howard Giles, and Karen L. Henwood. 1988. Accommodating the elderly: Invoking and extending a theory, Language in Society, 17(1): 1-41.
7. David Crystal. 2001. Language and the Internet. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
8. Olivier de Vel, Alison Anderson, Malcolm Comey, George Mohay. 2001. Mining e-mail content for author identification forensics, In SIGMOD: Special Section on Data Mining for Intrusion Detection and Threat Analysis.
9. th Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) 2007, pages 889-892.
10. Jade Goldstein-Stewart, Kerri A. Goodwin, Roberta E. Sabin, and Ransom K. Winder. 2008. Creating and using a correlated corpora to glean communicative commonalities. In LREC2008 Proceedings, Marrakech, Morocco.
11. Susan Herring. 2001. Gender and power in online communication. Center for Social Informatics, Working Paper, WP-01-05.
12. Susan Herring. 1996. Two variants of an electronic message schema. In Susan Herring, editor, Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social and Cross-Cultural Perspectives. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pages 81-106.
13. Shawndra Hill and Foster Provost. 2003. The myth of the double-blind review? Author identification using only citations. SIGKDD Explorations. 5(2): 179-184.
14. Moshe Koppel, Shlomo Argamon, and Anat Rachel Shimoni. 2002. Automatically categorizing written texts by author gender. Literary and Linguistic Computation. 17(4): 401-412.
15. Ivan Krsul and Eugene H. Spafford. 1997. Authorship analysis: Identifying the author of a program. Computers and Security 16(3): 233-257.
16. Shlomo Levitan and Shlomo Argamon. 2006. Fixing the federalist: correcting results and evaluating editions for automated attribution. In Digital Humanities, pages 323-328, Paris.
17. LIWC, Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count. http://www.liwc.net/
18. David Madigan, Alexander Genkin, David Lewis, Shlomo Argamon, Dmitriy Fradkin, and Li Ye. 2005. Author identification on the large scale. Proc. of the Meeting of the Classification Society of North America.
19. Philip M. McCarthy, Gwyneth A. Lewis, David F. Dufty, and Danielle S. McNamara. 2006. Analyzing writing styles with Coh-Metrix, In Proceedings of AI Research Society International Conference (FLAIRS), pages 764-769.
20. Niamh McCombe. 2002. Methods of author identification, Final Year Project, Trinity College, Ireland.
21. Thomas C. Mendenhall. 1887. The characteristic curves of composition. Science, 9(214): 237-249.
22. Frederick Mosteller and David L. Wallace. 1964. Inference and Disputed Authorship: The Federalist. Addison-Wesley, Boston.
23. James W. Pennebaker, Martha E. Francis, and Roger J. Booth. 2001. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC): LIWC2001. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
24. John C. Piatt. 1998. Using sparseness and analytic QP to speed training of support vector machines. In M. S. Kearns, S. A. Solla, and D. A. Cohn, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 11. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
25. Roberta E. Sabin, Kerri A. Goodwin, Jade Goldstein-Stewart, and Joseph A. Pereira. 2008. Gender differences across correlated corpora: preliminary results. FLAIRS Conference 2008, Florida, pages 207-212.
26. Marina Santini. 2007. Automatic Identification of Genre in Web Pages. Ph.D., thesis, University of Brighton, Brighton, UK.
27. Michael Shepherd and Carolyn Watters. 1999. The functionality attribute of cybergenres. In Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conf. on System Sciences (HICSS1999), Maui, HI.
28. Rob Thomson and Tamar Murachver. 2001. Predicting gender from electronic discourse. British Journal of Social Psychology. 40(2): 193-208.
29. Ian Witten and Eibe Frank. 2005. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques (Second Edition). Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA.
30. Simeon J. Yates. 1996. Oral and written linguistic aspects of computer conferencing: a corpus based study. In Susan Herring, editor, Computer-mediated Communication: Linguistic, Social, and Cross-Cultural Perspectives. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pages 29-46.