Exposure levels for chemical threat compounds: Information to facilitate chemical incident response

Journal of Emergency Management

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 355-384

  Hauschild, Veronique D ^a   Watson, Annetta ^b  

^a Directorate of Occupational and Environmental Medicine   (United Kingdom)

^b OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Arsine; Chemical emergency response; Chemical threat; Chemical warfare agents; Exposure criteria; Hydrogen cyanide; Nerve agents; Phosgene; Sulfur mustard; Toxic industrial chemicals

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL WARFARE AGENT;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ACCIDENT; CHEMICAL SAFETY; CHEMICAL WARFARE; CHEMISTRY; CIVIL DEFENSE; CLASSIFICATION; DISASTER PLANNING; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; OCCUPATIONAL ACCIDENT; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT; WASTE MANAGEMENT; ACCIDENTS, OCCUPATIONAL; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; PROCEDURES;

ACCIDENTS, OCCUPATIONAL; CHEMICAL HAZARD RELEASE; CHEMICAL SAFETY; CHEMICAL TERRORISM; CHEMICAL WARFARE AGENTS; CIVIL DEFENSE; DECONTAMINATION; DISASTER PLANNING; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; HUMANS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84891620797     PISSN: 15435865     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5055/jem.2013.0151     Document Type: Article

References (123)

1. National Research Council, Committee on Toxicology: Standing Operating Procedures for Developing Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Hazardous Chemicals. Washington, DC: Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, National Academy Press, 2001.
2. Langabeer JR, Dellifraine JL: Incorporating strategic management into public health emergency preparedness. J Emerg Manag. 2011: 9(2): 17-25.
3. World Health Organization: Rapid Risk Assessment of Acute Public Health Events, WHO/HSE/GAR/ARO/2012.1. Geneva, Switzerland:World Health Organization, WHO Press, 2012.
4. US Department of Homeland Security: National Preparedness Guidelines (September 2007). Washington, DC: US Department of Homeland Security, Nebraska Avenue Complex, 2007.
5. US Department of Homeland Security: Proceedings of the Chemical Restoration Operational Technology Demonstration Project CWA Remediation Table-Top Exercise. LLNL-PROC-412262. Prepared by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Washington, DC: US Department of Homeland Security, 2009.
6. Watson A, Bakshi K, Opresko D, et al.: Cholinesterase inhibitors as chemical warfare agents: Community response guidelines. In Gupta RC (ed.): Toxicology of Organophosphates and Carbamates. New York: Elsevier Publishing, 2006: 47-68.
7. Watson A, Hall L, Raber E, et al.: Developing health-based preplanning clearance goals for airport remediation following chemical terrorist attack: Introduction and key assessment considerations. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 2011; 17(1): 2-56.
8. Watson A, Dolislager F, Hall L, et al.: Developing health-based pre-planning clearance goals for airport remediation following a chemical terrorist attack: Decision criteria for multipathway exposure routes. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 2011; 17(1): 57-121.
9. Chemical Stockpile Emergency Preparedness Program: Adoption of Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs), Policy Paper No. 20 (revised). Washington, DC: Department of the Army and Federal Emergency Management Agency, Chemical Stockpile Emergency Preparedness Program, 2003.
10. US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA): General Guidance on Risk Management Programs For Chemical Accident Prevention (40 CFR Part 68). Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, 2009; EPA 555-B-04-001.
11. US Department of Transportation (USDOT): 2012 Emergency Response Guidebook: A Guidebook for First Responders During the Initial Phase of a Dangerous Goods/Hazardous Materials Transportation Incident.Washington, DC: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, US Department of Transportation, 2012: 289.
12. US Army Public Health Command: Basic questions regarding Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) in emergency planning and response, US Army PHC Factsheet. Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: US Army Public Health Command, 2011. Available at 0Basic%20Facts%20agg%20July%202011-VH%20edits.pdf. Accessed March 7, 2013.
13. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory (NPPTL): Standards for Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) Respirators, Attachment A (Statement of Standard for CBRN Air-Purifying Escape Respirator), Attachment B (Statement of Standard for Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) Self-Contained Escape Respirator). Atlanta, GA: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2003. Available athttp://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/standardsdev/cbrn/escape/. Accessed December 15, 2012.
14. Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense-Health Affairs: Incorporation of Health-Based Performance Criteria into Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Systems Acquisitions. Memorandum for Deputy Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Chemical and Biological Defense and Chemical Demilitarization. Signed by COL Donald L. Noah, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense, Force Health Protection and Readiness. Washington, DC: Department of Defense, Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense, 2009.
15. US Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine: Health-Based Chemical Vapor Concentration Levels for Future Systems Acquisition. Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: US Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine, 2008; USACHPPM Technical Report (TR) 64-FF-07Z2-07.
16. US Army Public Health Command: Basic facts regarding chemical exposure standards and guidelines. US Army Public Health Command Factsheet. Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: US Army Public Health Command; 2011.Available at . mil/PHC%20Resource%20Library/ Basic%20Facts%20Chem%20Sandards%20and%20Gudelines%20July%202011%20agg-VH%20e dits.pdf. Accessed February 14, 2012.
17. US Army Public Health Command: Chemical agent air criteria summary table 1. Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: US Army Public Health Command; 2011. Available at PHC%20Resource%20Library/Chem%20Agent%20Health%20Crite ria%20Summary%20Table%201%20Criteria%20for%20AIRBORNE% 20Exposures%20July%202010%20July%202011%20-VH %20edits%2026%20July.agg.pdf. Accessed February 14, 2012.
18. American Industrial Hygiene Association: The AIHA 2010 Emergency Response Planning Guidelines and Workplace Environmental Exposure Level Guides Handbook. Fairfax, VA: American Industrial Hygiene Association, 2010.
19. National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health: NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. Available at . gov/niosh/npg/default.html. Accessed July 11, 2011.
20. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Emergency response safety and health database. Available at www.cdc.gov/NIOSH/ershdb/ and www.cdc.gov/niosh/ershdb/ about.html. Accessed February 16, 2013.
21. Centers for Disease Control and Protection, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR): ATSDR minimum risk levels. Available at mrls-february-2012.pdf. Accessed February 14, 2013.
22. US Department of Energy (USDOE), Office of Health, Safety and Security: Protective Action Criteria (PAC) with AEGLs, ERPGs, and TEELS. Rev 27 for chemicals of concern (03/2012). Available at http://www.hss.energy.gov/ healthsafety/wshp/chem/safety/teel.html. Accessed February 20, 2013.
23. US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development: IRIS glossary (updated August 31, 2011). Integrated Risk Information System, National Center for Environmental Assessment, USEPA Office of Research and Development. Available at http://www.epa.gov/ncea/iris/index.html. Accessed February 16, 2013.
24. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Final recommendations for protecting the health and safety against potential adverse effects of long-term exposure to low doses of agents GA, GB, VX, Mustard Agent (H, HD, T), and Lewisite (L). Federal Register. 1988; 53: 8504-8507.
25. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Final recommendations for protecting human health from potential adverse effects of exposure to agents GA, GB and VX. Federal Register. 2003; 68(196): 58348-58351.
26. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Interim recommendations for airborne exposure limits for chemical warfare agents H and HD (Sulfur Mustard). Federal Register. 2004; 69(85): 24164-24168.
27. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists: TLVs and BEIs, Based on the Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices. Cincinnati, OH: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, 2010.
28. US Department of the Army: Toxic Chemical Agent Safety Standards. Washington, DC: US Department of the Army, Headquarters, 2008; Department of the Army Pamphlet (DA Pam) 385-61.
29. Topping M: Occupational exposure limits for chemicals. Occup Environ Med. 2001; 58: 138-144.
30. International Labour Organization (ILO): Chemical exposure limits, resource list. 2009. Available at areasofwork/WCMS-118291/lang-en/index.htm. Accessed Febrary 20, 2013.
31. US Army Public Health Command: Chemical agent criteria- Media other than air, table 2. Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: US Army Public Health Command, 2011. Available at . amedd.army.mil/PHC%20Resource%20Library/ Chem%20Agent%20Health%20Criteria%20Summary%20Table%202-WaterSoilWaste- %20USAPHC%20Update%20July%202010%20agg-VH%20edits-26%20July.pdf. Accessed February 14, 2012.
32. US Environmental Protection Agency: 2011 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories. EPA 820-R-11- 002. Washington, DC: Office of Water, US Environmental Protection Agency, 2011.
33. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA): Bottled water regulations, rules, reports and guidance for industry, Update of December 18, 2012. Washington, DC. Available at . http://www.fda.gov/food/foodsafety/productspecificinformation/ bottledwatercarbonatesoftdrinks/ ucm07765.htm. Accessed February 22, 2013.
34. US Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine: Acute Toxicity Estimation and Operational Risk Management of Chemical Warfare Agent Exposures. Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: US Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine, 2004; USACHPPM Report No. 47-EM-5863-04.
35. US Department of the Army: Potential Military Chemical/Biological Agents and Compounds. (Army, Marine Corps, Navy, Air Force Multiservice Tactics, Techniques and Procedures). Ft. Leonard Wood, MO: Commandant, US Army Chemical School, 2005; Field Manual (FM) 3-11.9.
36. Watson A, Opresko D, Hauschild V: Evaluation of Chemical Warfare Agent Percutaneous Vapor Toxicity: Derivation of Toxicity Guidelines for Assessing Chemical Protective Ensembles, ORNL/TM/180. Oak Ridge,TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2003.
37. US Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine: Development of Percutaneous Toxicity Based Vapor Permeation Test Criteria for Personal Protective Equipment Ensembles. Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: US Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine, 2007. USACHPPM Toxicological Study No. 85-XC-04MC-07.
38. US Environmental Protection Agency: USEPA Region III Risk- Based Concentration Table, Background Information, Development of Risk-Based Concentrations. Philadelphia, PA: US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Superfund Programs; 1996.
39. US Environmental Protection Agency: Soil Screening Guidance: Technical Background Document.Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, 1996; EPA/540/R-95/128.
40. US Environmental Protection Agency: Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superfund Sites, Interim Guidance. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Solid Waste and Emergency and Remedial Response, 2001; OSWER 9355.4-24.
41. US Environmental Protection Agency: Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Volume I-Human Health Evaluation Manual: Part B, Development of Risk-Based Preliminary Remediation Goals. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency and Remedial Response, 1991. OSWER Directive 9285.7-01B.
42. US Environmental Protection Agency: Regional screening levels for chemical contaminants at superfund sites, users" guide. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, Mid Atlantic Risk Assessment. Available at reghwmd/risk/human/rb-concentration-tabel/usersguide.htm. Accessed August 4, 2011.
43. US Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine: Health-Based Environmental Screening Levels for Chemical Warfare Agents. Technical Report. Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: US Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine, 1999. Available at http://chppm-www.apgea.army.mil/chemicalagent/. Accessed February 14, 2011
44. Watson A, Dolislager F: Re-evaluation of 1999 Health Based Environmental Screening Levels (HBESLs) for Chemical Warfare Agents. ORNL/TM-2007/080. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2007.
45. US Department of the Army: Interim Guidance for Chemical Warfare Material (CWM) Responses. Memorandum, Office of the Assistant Secretary Installations and Environment, Department of the Army. Washington, DC: Office of the Assistant Secretary, US Department of the Army, 2009.
46. Smart JK: History of Chemical and Biological Warfare: An American Perspective. In Sidell FR, Takafuji ET, Franz DR (eds.): Medical Aspects of Chemical and Biological Warfare. Washington, DC: Office of the Surgeon General, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, 1997: 9-86.
47. Institute of Medicine, Pechura CM, Rall DP (eds.): Veterans at Risk: The Health Effects of Mustard Gas and Lewisite.Washington, DC: Committee to Survey the Health Effects of Mustard Gas and Lewisite, Division of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press, 2003.
48. US Department of the Army, Chemical Materiel Destruction Agency: Survey and Analysis Report. Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: Program Manager for Nonstockpile Chemical Materiel, Nonstockpile Chemical Materiel Program, US Department of the Army, 1993.
49. US Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine: Chemical Biological Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) Medical BattleBook. Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: US Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine, 2008. USACHPPM Technical Guide (TG) 244.
50. US Army Medical Research Institute of Chemical Defense: Medical Management of Chemical Casualties Handbook, 4th edition. Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: Chemical Casualty Care Office, US Army Medical Research Institute of Chemical Defense, 2007.
51. Sidell FR, Patrick WC, Dashiell TR: Jane"s Chem-Bio Handbook. Alexandria, VA: Jane"s Information Group, 2000.
52. US Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine: Part Four: Toxic industrial chemicals (TICs). In Diagnosis and Treatment of Diseases of Tactical Importance to US Central Command. Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: US Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine, 2005: 156-206. USACHPPM Technical Guide (TG) 273.
53. Sidell FR: Nerve agents. In Sidell FR, Takafuji ET, Franz DR (eds.): Medical Aspects of Chemical and Biological Warfare. Washington, DC: Office of the Surgeon General,Walter Reed Army Medical Center, 1997: 129-179.
54. Dunn MA, Sidell FR: Progress in the medical defense against nerve agents. JAMA. 1989; 262: 649-652.
55. Blewett W: Tactical weapons: Is mustard still king? NBC Defense Technol Internat. 1986; 1: 64-66.
56. Sidell FR: Clinical considerations in nerve agent intoxication. In Somani SM (ed.): Chemical Warfare Agents. New York, NY: Academic Press, Inc.; 1992: 155-194.
57. US Army Chemical Materials Activity: Agent destruction status. Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: US Army Chemical Materials Activity. Available at www.cma.army.mil. Accessed March 5, 2013.
58. Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons: Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on their Destruction (Chemical Weapons Convention).Version of July 2005. The Hague, Netherlands: Technical Secretariat of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. Available at www.opcw.org. Accessed March 5, 2013.
59. Shea DA: High-Threat Chemical Agents: Characteristics, Effects, and Policy Implications, CRS Report to Congress. Washington DC: Congressional Research Service, The Library of Congress, 2003. Order Code RL31861.
60. Office of Technology Assessment: Technologies Underlying Weapons of Mass Destruction.Washington DC: US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, US Government Printing Office, 1993. OTA-BP-ISC-115.
61. Haber LF: The Poisonous Cloud. New York, NY: Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, 1986.
62. US Army Public Health Command: Deployment Health Guide (DHG): Toxic Industrial Chemicals (TIC) Release Response. Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: US Army Public Health Command, 2012. Available at http://phc.amedd.army.mil. Accessed December 30, 2012.
63. US Army Public Health Command: Chlorine Improvised Explosive Devices and Preventive Medicine (PVTTMD) Actions. Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: US Army Public Health Command, 2010. US Army Public Health Command, 2010. US Army Public Health Command Factsheet 36-15-0407. Available at http:/phc. amedd.army.mil/PHCResourceLibrary/chlorineIED Fact.Sheet.pdf. Accessed March 7, 2013.
64. Hauschild V, Bratt G: Prioritizing industrial chemical hazards. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2005; 68: 857-876.
65. Kozlow C, Sullivan J: Jane"s Facility Security Handbook. Alexandria, VA: Jane"s Information Group, 2000.
66. US Army Public Health Command: A Toxic Industrial Chemical (TIC) Priority "Short List" to Support Materiel Testing and Acquisition. Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: US Army Public Health Command, 2013. Technical Information Paper (TIP) No 64- 003-1012.
67. Hauschild V,Watson A, Bock R: Decontamination and management of human remains following incidents of hazardous chemical release. Am J Disaster Med. 2012; 7(7): 5-29.
68. National Response Team: Quick reference guides (QRGs) for chemical warfare agents; key references cited/used in chemicalagent QRGs. Washington, DC: National Response Team, 2011 and 2012. Available at http://www.nrt.org. Accessed July 12, 2012.
69. National Research Council, Committee on Toxicology: Arsine. In Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals, Vol. 1. Washington, DC: Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, National Academy Press, 2000: 65-112.
70. National Research Council, Committee on Toxicology: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals, Vol. 2. Washington, DC: Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, The National Academies Press, 2002.
71. National Research Council, Committee on toxicology: Nerve agents; sulfur mustard. In Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals,Vol. 3.Washington DC: Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, The National Academies Press, 2003: 15-300, 301-383.
72. Watson A, Opresko D, Young R, et al.: Development and application of Acute Exposure Guideline Levels (AEGLs) for chemical warfare nerve and sulfur mustard agents. J Toxicol Environ Health B. 2006; 9:173-263.
73. US Department of Defense: Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms. Washington, DC: Joint Chiefs of Staff, 2011. Joint Publication JP 1-02 (November 8, 2010 as amended through January 31, 2011). Available at . dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/new-pubs/jp1-02.pdf. Accessed April 5, 2011.
74. Bakshi KS, Pang SNJ, Snyder R (eds.): Review of the Army"s health risk assessments for oral exposure to six chemical-warfare agents. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2000; 59: 281-526.
75. Talmage SS, Munro NB,Watson AP, et al.: The fate of chemical warfare agents in the environment. In Marrs TC, Maynard RL, Sidell FR (eds.): Chemical Warfare Agents: Toxicology and Treatment, 2nd ed. Chichester, West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2007: 89-125.
76. Talmage SS, Watson AP, Hauschild V, et al.: Chemical warfare agent degradation and decontamination. Curr Org Chem. 2007; 11: 285-298.
77. Munro NB, Talmage SS, Griffin GD, et al.: The sources, fate and toxicity of chemical warfare agent degradation products. Environ Health Perspect. 1999; 107: 933-974.
78. US Department of the Army: New Immediately Dangerous to Life and Health (IDLH) Concentration for Lewisite. Memorandum, Office of the Surgeon General, Falls Church, VA: Office of the Surgeon General, US Department of the Army, 2009.
79. US Department of the Army: Implementation Guidance Policy for New Airborne Exposure Limits for GB, GA, GD, GF, VX, H, HD and HT. Memorandum through Director of Army Staff, Department of the Army. Washington, DC: Office of the Assistant Secretary, Installations and Environment, 2004.
80. US Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine: Evaluation of Airborne Exposure Limits for Sulfur Mustard: Occupational and General Population Exposure Criteria. Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: US Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine, 2000. USACHPPM Technical Report (TR) No. 47-EM-3767-00.
81. US Environmental Protection Agency: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Lewisite L-1, Lewisite L-2, Lewisite L-3. Interim. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, National Advisory Committee on AEGLs, 2007. Available at http://www.epa.gov/ oppt/aegl/pubs/rest133.htm. Accessed July 10, 2011
82. National Research Council, Committee on Toxicology: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals, Vol. 6. Washington, DC: Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, The National Academies Press, 2008.
83. US Department of the Army: Sanitary Control and Surveillance of Field Water Supplies. Washington, DC: Headquarters, Department of the Army, 2005. Technical Bulletin TB-MED 577.
84. US Department of the Army: Sanitary Control and Surveillance of Field Water Supplies. Washington, DC: Headquarters, Departments of the Army, Navy and Air Force, 2010. Technical Bulletin TB-MED 577/NAVMED P-5010-10/AFMAN 48-138-IP.
85. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry: Toxicological Profile for Sulfur Mustard (Update). Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, 2003.Available at www.atsdr.cdc.gov/Tox Profiles/tp49.pdf. Accessed June 21, 2011
86. Opresko D, Young R, Faust R, et al: Chemical warfare agents: Estimating oral reference doses. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 1998; 156: 1-183.
87. Opresko DM, Young RA, Watson AP, et al.: Chemical warfare agents: Current status of oral reference doses. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2001; 172: 65-85.
88. National Research Council, Committee on Toxicology: Review of the US Army"s Health Risk Assessment for Oral Exposure to Six Chemical Warfare Agents.Washington, DC: COT Subcommittee on Chronic Reference Dose for Chemical Warfare Agents, Committee on Toxicology, National Academy Press; 1999.
89. US Department of the Army: Chronic Toxicological Criteria for Chemical Warfare Compounds. Memorandum, through Assistant Surgeon General for Force Projection, Office of the Surgeon General, Department of the Army. Falls Church, VA: Office of the Surgeon General, Department of the Army, 2000.
90. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Airborne exposure limits for chemical warfare agents GA (Tabun), GB (Sarin), and VX. Federal Register. 2002; 67(5): 894-901.
91. US Department of the Army: Nerve Agent Percutaneous Exposure Criteria and Airborne Exposure Levels (AELs) for GD, GF for Use in Interim DA Guidance on Implementation of the New AELs. Memorandum, Office of the Surgeon General, Department of the Army. Falls Church, VA: Office of the Surgeon General, Department of the Army, 2004.
92. Tu AT: Chemical Terrorism: Horrors in Tokyo Subway and Matsumoto City. Ft. Collins, CO: Alaken Inc., 2002.
93. Tu AT: Toxicological and chemical aspects of sarin terrorism in Japan in 1994 and 1995. Toxin Rev. 2007; 26: 231-274.
94. Okumura T, Nomura T, Suzuki T, et al.: The dark morning: The experiences and lessons learned from the Tokyo subway sarin attack. In Marrs TC, Maynard RL, Sidell FR (eds.): Chemical Warfare Agents:Toxicology and Treatment, 2nd ed. Chichester,West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2007: 277-285.
95. Mitchell J, Edmonds A, Cutter S, et al.: Evacuation Behavior in Response to the Graniteville, South Carolina, Chlorine Spill. Columbia, SC: Hazards Research Lab, Department of Geography and Department of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of South Carolina, 2005. Quick Response Research Report 178.
96. U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District 2007. US Army Corps of Engineers, Baltimore District: Site-Specific Public Protection Plan for the Investigation of Burial Pit 3 at 4825 Glenbrook Road, Spring Valley FUDS, Washington, D.C. (Final, October 2007). Baltimore, MD: US Army Corps of Engineers, Baltimore District; 2007. Available at: http://www.nab.usace.army. mil/Projects/Spring%20Valley/. Accessed July 12, 2011
97. National Research Council, Committee on Toxicology: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals, Vol. 4. Washington DC: Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, The National Academies Press, 2004.
98. National Research Council, Committee on Toxicology: Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals, Vol. 5. Washington DC: Subcommittee on Acute Exposure Guideline Levels, Committee on Toxicology, The National Academies Press, 2007.
99. US Army Public Health Command (Prov): Chemical Exposure Guidelines for Deployed Military Personnel. Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: US Army Public Health Command, Provisional, 2010. Technical Guide (TG) 230. Available at http://phc.amedd.army.mil/PHC Resource Library/TG230.pdf. Accessed May 27, 2011.
100. US Department of Defense: Department of Defense Instruction 6490.03: Deployment Health (August 11, 2006). Washington, DC: US Dept of Defense, 2006. Available at http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/649003p.pdf. Accessed July 11, 2011.
101. US Department of Defense: Procedures for Deployment Health Surveillance, Memorandum MCM 0028-07 (November 2, 2007). Washington, DC: US Dept of Defense, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Office of the Chairman, 2007. Available at: http://afhsc.army.mil/viewDocument?file=JCS-PDFs/MCM%200028- 07%20Deployment%20Hlth%20Surv%20nov07.pdf. Accessed July 11, 2011.
102. Weese CB: Evaluation of exposure incident at the qarmat ali water treatment plant. US Army Med Dept J. 2009; April-June: 10-13.
103. Yang Y-C, Baker JA, Ward JR: Decontamination of chemical warfare agents. Chem Rev. 1992; 92: 1729-1743.
104. Yang Y-C: Chemical reactions for neutralizing chemical warfare agents. Chem Ind. 1995; 9: 334-337.
105. US Department of the Army, Chemical Materiel Destruction Agency: Interim Survey and Analysis Report. Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: Program Manager for Nonstockpile Chemical Materiel, Nonstockpile Chemical Materiel Program, US Department of the Army, 1993.
106. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. California Environmental Protection Agency: Guidelines for Establishing California Preliminary Indoor Clearance Levels Following a Release of a Chemical Warfare Agent. Sacramento, CA: Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, California Environmental Protection Agency, 2011.
107. Drogin B: Digging up chemical weapons in D.C. Los Angeles Times, May 9, 2010.
108. Zongkar B: Army Corps finds new WWI chemical site in DC yard. Associated Press. April 16, 2010.
109. PARSONS: Appendix J "CWM Air Monitoring/Soil Screening Plan and CWM Sample Analysis Plan" (Sect. 3.3.4 and 3.3.5 re Headspace Analysis Procedures). In Site-Specific Work Plan for the Investigation of Burial Pit 3, 4825 Glenbrook Road [Spring Valley Formerly Used Defense Site (SVFUDS)]. Prepared for US Army Engineering and Support Center, Huntsville AL and US Army Corps of Engineers Baltimore District, Baltimore, MD. Fairfax, VA: PARSONS; 2007.
110. Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board: DDESB Final Approval of Request for Approval, Amendment 2, Chemical Safety Submission (CSS) for the Spring Valley Formerly Used Defense Site (FUDS). Memorandum for Director, US Army Defense Ammunition Center. Signed by Curtis M. Bowling, Chairman, DDESB. Washington DC and Alexandria, VA: Department of Defense Explosives Safety Board; 2008.
111. US Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine: Safety and Health Guidance for Mortuary Affairs Operations: Infectious Materials and CBRN Handling. Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: US Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine, 2009. USACHPPM Technical Guide (TG) 195.
112. Dillon MB, Baskett RL, Foster, KT, et al.: The NARAC Emergency Response Guide to Initial Airborne Hazard Estimates. Livermore, CA: University of California, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Technical Information Department, 2004. UCRL-TM-202990.
113. Komiya T, Kamakura H: The rescue operations and EMS activities after the poison gas terror. In Proceedings of First Worldwide Conference on Strengthening the Fire and Emergency Response to Terrorism, November 6-9, 1995, Mt.Weather Emergency Assistance Center, Berryville, VA. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency, US Dept Homeland Security, 1995: 1-12.
114. Carnes SA: Disposing of chemical weapons: A desired end in search of an acceptable means. Environ Professional. 1989; 11: 279-290.
115. US Army Chemical Materials Agency: Interim Supplemental Chemical Materials Agency (CMA) Implementation for Revised AELs. Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: U.A. Army Chemical Materials Agency, 2004.
116. Walter K: On the Leading Edge of Atmospheric Predictions. Sci Technol Rev. 2007; March: 13-19.
117. Aristatek: Chlorine Rail Car Accident, Macdona, TX. Laramie, WY: Aristatek Inc., 2007. PEAC Aristatek Newsletter. Available at . Accessed February 10, 2013.
118. Kingery AF, Allen HE: The environmental fate of organophosphorous nerve agents: A review. Toxicol Environ Chem. 1995; 47: 155-184.
119. US Department of the Army: Health Service Support in a Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Environment: Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures. Washington, DC: Headquarters, Department of the Army, 2002. Field Manual (FM) 4-02-7.
120. US Departments of the Army, Marine Corps, Navy and Air Force: CBRN Decontamination: Multi-Service Tactics, Techniques and Procedures for Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Decontamination. Ft. Leonard Wood, MO: Commandant, US Army Chemical School; 2006. Field Manual (FM) 3-11.5, MCWP 3-37.3, NTTP 3-11.26, AFTTP (I) 3-2.60.
121. Ember LR: Tokyo subway attack: Chemical weapon possible terrorist tool. Chem Eng News. 1995; March 27: 6-7.
122. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UN/ECE): Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS). New York and Geneva: Secretariat of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe; 2003. First Edition, Sales No. E.03.11.E.25, ISBN 92-1-116840-6. Available at:
123. National Guard: The National Guard"s Role in Homeland Defense; National Guard Civil Support Team (CST). Arlington, VA: The National Guard Bureau, 2013. Available at . mil/features/HomelandDefense/cst/factsheet.html. Accessed May 29, 2013.