Feasibility and effectiveness of remote, telephone-based delivery of cardiac rehabilitation

Telemedicine and e-Health

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 32-38

  Wakefield, Bonnie ^a   Drwal, Kariann ^a   Scherubel, Melody ^a   Klobucar, Thomas ^b   Johnson, Skyler ^a   Kaboli, Peter ^a,c  

^a VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cardiology cardiovascular disease; Home health monitoring; Telecommunications

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF COVARIANCES; CARDIAC REHABILITATIONS; CARDIO-VASCULAR DISEASE; CARDIOLOGY/CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CATEGORICAL VARIABLES; HOME HEALTH MONITORING; MEDICATION ADHERENCE; STANDARD DEVIATION;

COSTS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOFTWARE TESTING; TELECOMMUNICATION; TELEPHONE; TELEPHONE SETS;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

AGED; CLINICAL TRIAL; COST; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEART SURGERY; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT EDUCATION; REHABILITATION; TELEPHONE; TIME;

AGED; CARDIAC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; TELEPHONE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84891603890     PISSN: 15305627     EISSN: 15563669     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2013.0079     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Hammill BG, et al. Relationship between cardiac rehabilitation and long-term risks of death and myocardial infarction among elderly Medicare beneficiaries. Circulation 2010;121:63-70.
2. Suaya JA, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation and survival in older coronary patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:25-33.
3. Heran BS, et al. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease systematic review. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;8:8.
4. Smith SC Jr, et al. AHA/ACCF secondary prevention and risk reduction therapy for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2011 update: A guideline from the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology Foundation. Circulation 2011;124:2458-2473.
5. Jackson L, et al. Getting the most out of cardiac rehabilitation: A review of referral and adherence predictors. Heart 2005;91:10-14.
6. Daly J, et al. Barriers to participation in and adherence to cardiac rehabilitation programs: A critical literature review. Prog Cardiovasc Nurs 2002;17:8-17.
7. Jolly K, et al. Home-based cardiac rehabilitation compared with centre-based rehabilitation and usual care: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol 2006;111:343-351.
8. Taylor RS, et al. Home-based versus centre-based cardiac rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;1:CD007130.
9. Blair J, et al. Home versus hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation: A systematic review. Rural Remote Health 2011;11:1532.
10. Dent L, et al. "Flogging dead horses": Evaluating when have clinical trials achieved sufficiency and stability? A case study in cardiac rehabilitation. Trials 2011;12:83.
11. Glasgow RE, et al. The RE-AIM framework for evaluating interventions: What can it tell us about approaches to chronic illness management? Patient Educ Counsel 2001;44:119-127.
12. Jolly K, et al. Home-based versus hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction or revascularisation: Design and rationale of the Birmingham Rehabilitation Uptake Maximisation Study (BRUM): A randomisedcontrolled trial ISRCTN72884263. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2003;3:10.
13. Jolly K, et al. The Birmingham Rehabilitation Uptake Maximisation study (BRUM): A randomised controlled trial comparing home-based with centrebased cardiac rehabilitation. Heart 2009;95:36-42.
14. Wilson RC, Jones PW. A comparison of the visual analogue scale and modified Borg scale for the measurement of dyspnoea during exercise. Clin Sci 1989;76:277-282.
15. Wilson RC, Jones PW. Long-term reproducibility of Borg scale estimates of breathlessness during exercise. Clin Sci 1991;80:309-312.
16. Thompson W, ed. American College of Sports Medicine guidelines for exercise testing and prescription, 8th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, 2010.
17. Morisky DE, Green LW, Levine DM. Concurrent and predictive validity of a selfreported measure of medication adherence. Med Care 1986;24:67-74.
18. Bosworth H, et al. Hypertension medication adherence: Racial, clinical, psychosocial factors, Presented at the Veterans Affairs Health Services Research & Development Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, 2004.
19. Burke WJ, Roccaforte WH, Wengel SP. The short form of the Geriatric Depression Scale: A comparison with the 30-item form. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 1991;4:173-178.
20. Yesavage JA, et al. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: A preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res 1982;17:37-49.
21. Sheikh J, Yesavage J. Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): Recent evidence and development of a shorter version. In: Clinical gerontology: A guide to assessment and intervention. New York: The Hayworth Press, 1986:165-173.
22. Lyness JM, et al. Screening for depression in elderly primary care patients. A comparison of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale and the Geriatric Depression Scale. Arch Intern Med 1997;157:449-454.
23. Spertus JA, et al. Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire: A new functional status measure for coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25:333-341.
24. Spertus JA, et al. Health status predicts long-term outcome in outpatients with coronary disease. Circulation 2002;106:43-49.
25. Kayaniyil S, et al. Degree and correlates of cardiac knowledge and awareness among cardiac inpatients. Patient Educ Counsel 2009;75:99-107.
26. Briggs A, O'Brien B. The death of cost-minimization analysis? Health Econ 2001;10:179-184.
27. Drummond M, et al. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.