An assessment of different solvent-based capture technologies within an IGCC-CCS power plant

Energy

Volumn 64, Issue , 2014, Pages 268-276

  Urech, Jeremy ^a,b   Tock, Laurence ^a   Harkin, Trent ^c   Hoadley, Andrew ^b   Maréchal, François ^a  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

^b MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c University of Melbourne   (Australia)

Author keywords

Hot potassium carbonate; Multi objective optimization; Pre combustion capture; Process design; Process integration; Thermo modeling

Indexed keywords

BITUMINOUS COAL; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBONATION; COAL GASIFICATION PLANTS; COMBINED CYCLE POWER PLANTS; EFFICIENCY; GAS INDUSTRY; GAS TURBINES; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; POTASH; PRECOMBUSTION; PROCESS DESIGN; SOLVENTS; SYNTHESIS GAS; SYNTHESIS GAS MANUFACTURE; COAL COMBUSTION; COMBUSTION; GASES; GASIFICATION; POTASSIUM; STEAM TURBINES;

COMBINED CYCLE PLANT; ENTRAINED FLOW GASIFIERS; HOT POTASSIUM CARBONATE PROCESS; INTEGRATED GASIFICATION COMBINED CYCLE; OPERATING TEMPERATURE; POWER GENERATION EFFICIENCY; PRE COMBUSTIONS; PROCESS INTEGRATION;

COAL COMBUSTION; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION;

ABSORPTION; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CARBONATE; COMBINED HEAT AND POWER; COMBUSTION; MULTIOBJECTIVE PROGRAMMING; OPERATIONS TECHNOLOGY; OPTIMIZATION; ORGANIC COMPOUND; POTASSIUM; POWER GENERATION; POWER PLANT; SOLVENT; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; THERMODYNAMICS; TURBINE; WATER VAPOR; DESIGN; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; NUMERICAL MODEL;

EID: 84891495821     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.10.081     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. IEA. Key World energy statistics. Report. International energy agency 18 November 2013;. http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/kwes.pdfviewed.
2. 2 from flue gas: a review. Sep Sci Technol 2005, 40(1-3):321-348.
3. 2 capture technology-The U.S. department of Energy's carbon sequestration program. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2008, 2(1):9-20.
4. 2 capture and separation technologies for end-of-pipe applications - a review. Energy 2010, 35(6):2610-2628.
5. 2 capture technologies. Energy Environ Sci 2010, 3(11):1645.
6. 2 capture from pre-combustion processes-Strategies for membrane gas separation. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2010, 4(5):739-755.
7. 2 capture in coal IGCC processes via gas separation membranes. Fuel Process Technol 2004, 85(5):337-346.
8. Skorek-Osikowska A., Janusz-Szymańska K., Kotowicz J. Modeling and analysis of selected carbon dioxide capture methods in IGCC systems. Energy 2012, 45(1):92-100.
9. Linga P., Kumar R., Englezos P. The clathrate hydrate process for post and pre-combustion capture of carbon dioxide. JHazard Mater 2007, 149(3):625-629.
10. IPCC IPCC Special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage 2005, Publ. Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-68551-1. B. Metz, O. Davidson, H. de Coninck, M. Loos, L. Meyer (Eds.).
11. DOE/NELT Cost perform baseline fossil energy: volume 1: Bitumous coal and natural gas to electricity 2007, DOE/NETL.
12. 2 capture 2007, Report 13. http://www.iea.org.
13. Cormos C.-C. Evaluation of energy integration aspects for IGCC-based hydrogen and electricity co-production with carbon capture and storage. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35(14):7485-7497.
14. Cormos C.-C. Integrated assessment of IGCC power generation technology with carbon capture. Energy March 2012, 42:434-445.
15. 2 removal. Energy June 2008, 33(6):874-881.
16. 2 emissions reduction in power generation. Energy Convers Manag janvier 2003, 44:93-108.
17. Flacke T.J., Hoadley A., Brennan D.J., Sinclair S.E. The sustainability of clean coal technology: IGCC with/without CCS. Process Safety Environ Prot 2011, 89:41-52.
18. Harkin T., Hoadley A., Hooper B. Optimisation of pre-combustion capture for IGCC with a focus on. Energy Procedia 2011, 4:1176-1183.
19. 2 capture and compression using pinch analysis. JCleaner Prod 2010, 18(9):857-866.
20. Khalilpour R., Abbas A. HEN optimization for efficient retrofitting of coal-fired power plants with post-combustion carbon capture. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2011, 5(2):189-199.
21. Erlach B., Schmidt M., Tsatsaronis G. Comparison of carbon capture IGCC with pre-combustion decarbonisation and with chemical-looping combustion. Energy 2011, 36(6):3804-3815.
22. 2 capture by pinch analysis. Chem Eng Trans 2010, 21:181-186.
23. CO2CRC, CO2CRC/HRL Mulgrave Capture Project, 2011.sighted 18 Nov 2013. http://www.co2crc.com.au/dls/brochures/CO2CRC_Mulgrave_brochure.pdf.
24. Gassner M., Maréchal F. Methodology for the optimal thermo-economic, multi-objectives design of thermochemical fuel production from biomass. Comput Chem Eng 2009, 33:769-781.
25. Aspen, "www.aspentech.com/products/aspen-plus.aspx".
26. Maréchal F., Palazzi F., Godat J., Favrat D. Thermo-economic modelling and optimisation of fuel cell system. Fuel Cell February 2005, 5(1).
27. Tock L., Gassner M., Maréchal F. Thermochemical production of liquid fuels from biomass. Biomass Bioenergy 2009, 34:1838-1854.
28. 2 mitigation: thermo-economic modeling and process integration. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37(16):11785-11795.
29. Kirschner M.J. "Oxygen," in Ullmann's encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry 2000, Wiley-VCH.
30. Hamelinck C.N., Faaij A.P.C. Future prospects for production of methanol and hydrogen from biomass. JPower Sources 2002, 11(1):1-22.
31. Zheng L., Furimsky E. Comparison of Shell, Texaco, BGL and KRW gasifiers as part of IGCC plant computer simulations. Energy Convers Manag 2005, 46:1767-1779.
32. Furimsky E. Gasification in petroleum refinery of 21st Century. Oil & gas science and technology - Rev. IFP 1999, vol. 54:597-618. No. 5.
33. Bolhar-Nordenkampf M., Friedl A., Koss U., Tork T. Modelling selective H2S absorption and desorption in an aqueous MDEA-solution using a rate-based non-equilibrium approach. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif June 2004, 43(6):701-715.
34. Hiller H., Reimert R. Gas production 2007.
35. Bucklin R.W., Schendel R.L. Comparison of physical solvents used for gas Processing. Energy Progress 1984, 4:137-142.
36. Qader A., Hooper B. Pre-combustion carbon dioxide capture technologies for Brown coal power generation 2011, CO2CRC, Australia.
37. 2-Results from solvent absorption pilot plant trials using 30wt.% potassium carbonate and boric acid promoted potassium carbonate solvent. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2012, 10:64-73.