Estimating the economic value of residential electricity use in the Republic of Korea using contingent valuation

Energy

Volumn 64, Issue , 2014, Pages 601-606

  Lim, Kyoung Min ^a   Lim, Seul Ye ^a   Yoo, Seung Hoon ^a  

^a Seoul National University of Science and Technology   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Contingent valuation; Economic value; Residential electricity; Spike model

Indexed keywords

ELECTRICITY; HOUSING; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ECONOMICS; RESOURCE VALUATION;

CONTINGENT VALUATIONS; DICHOTOMOUS CHOICE CONTINGENT VALUATION; ECONOMIC FEASIBILITIES; ECONOMIC VALUES; MICRO-ECONOMIC THEORY; RESIDENTIAL ELECTRICITY; RESIDENTIAL ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION; SPIKE MODELS;

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS;

CONTINGENT VALUATION; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; MICROECONOMICS; NUMERICAL MODEL; PROFITABILITY; RESIDENTIAL ENERGY; WILLINGNESS TO PAY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; FEASIBILITY STUDY; VALUATION;

SOUTH KOREA; KOREA;

EID: 84891493381     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.11.016     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ferguson R., Wilkinson W., Hill R. Electricity use and economic development. Energy Policy 2000, 28:923-934.
2. Payne J.E. Asurvey of the electricity consumption-growth literature. Appl Energy 2010, 87:723-731.
3. Yoo S.H. Electricity consumption and economic growth: evidence from Korea. Energy Policy 2005, 33:1627-1632.
4. Korea Electric Power Corporation Statistics of electric power in the Republic of Korea 2012.
5. Willig R.D. Consumer's surplus without apology. Am Econ Rev 1976, 66:589-597.
6. Grösche P., Schröder C. Eliciting public support for greening the electricity mix using random parameter technique. Energy Econ 2011, 33:363-370.
7. Won C. Valuation of investments in natural resources using contingent-claim framework with application to bituminous coal developments in Korea. Energy 2009, 34:1215-1224.
8. Arrow K., Solow R., Portney P.R., Leamer E.E., Radner R., Schuman H. Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation 1993, vol. 58:4601-4614. Federal Register.
9. Fisher A. The conceptual underpinnings of the contingent valuation method. The contingent valuation of environmental resources 1996, 19-37. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. D.J. Bjornstad, J.R. Kahn (Eds.).
10. Vehkatachalam L. The contingent valuation method: a review. Environ Impact Assess Rev 2004, 24:89-124.
11. Yoo S.H., Chae K.S. Measuring the economic benefits of the ozone pollution control policy in Seoul: results of a contingent valuation survey. Urban Stud 2001, 38:49-60.
12. Hanemann W.M. Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. Am J Agric Econ 1984, 66:332-341.
13. Cameron T.A., Quiggin J. Estimation using contingent valuation data from a 'dichotomous choice with follow-up' questionnaire. JEnviron Econ Manag 1994, 27:218-234.
14. McFadden D. Contingent valuation and social choice. Am J Agric Econ 1994, 76:689-708.
15. Bateman I.J., Langford I.H., Jones A.P., Kerr G.N. Bound and path effects in double and triple bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. Resour Energy Econ 2001, 23:191-213.
16. Hanemann W.M. Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses: reply. Am J Agric Econ 1989, 71:1057-1061.
17. Kriström B. Spike models in contingent valuation. Am J Agric Econ 1997, 79:1013-1023.
18. Yoo S.H., Kwak S.J. Using a spike model to deal with zero response data from double bounded dichotomous contingent valuation survey. Appl Econ Lett 2002, 9:929-932.
19. Krinsky I., Robb A.L. On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities. Rev Econ Stat 1986, 68:715-719.
20. Zhang L., Wu Y. Market segmentation and willingness to pay for green electricity among urban residents in China: the case of Jiangsu Province. Energy Policy 2012, 51:514-523.
21. Nomura N., Akai M. Willingness to pay for green electricity in Japan as estimated through contingent valuation method. Appl Energy 2004, 78:453-463.
22. Abdullah S., Jeanty P.W. Willingness to pay for renewable energy: evidence from a contingent valuation survey in Kenya. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2011, 15:2974-2983.
23. Zorić J., Hrovatin N. Household willingness to pay for green electricity in Slovenia. Energy Policy 2012, 47:180-187.
24. Oliver H., Volschenk J., Smit E. Residential consumers in the Cape Peninsula's willingness to pay for premium price green electricity. Energy Policy 2011, 39:544-550.
25. Yoo S.H., Kwak S.Y. Willingness to pay for green electricity in Korea: a contingent valuation Study. Energy Policy 2009, 37:5408-5416.
26. Roe B., Teisl M.F., Levy A., Russell M. US consumers' willingness to pay for green electricity. Energy Policy 2001, 29:917-925.
27. Abdullah S., Mariel P. Choice experiment study on the willingness to pay to improve electricity services. Energy Policy 2010, 38:4570-4581.
28. Baarsma B.E., Hop J.P. Pricing power outages in the Netherlands. Energy 2009, 34:1378-1386.
29. Woo C.K., Pupp R.L. Costs of service disruptions to electricity consumers. Energy 1992, 17:109-126.
30. Yoo S.H., Lee S. The economic value of residential electricity consumption in Seoul. JEnergy Eng 2012, 21:81-85.
31. Alexander D.L., Kern W., Neill J. Valuing the consumption benefits from professional sports franchises. JUrban Econ 2000, 48:321-337.
32. International Energy Agency Energy prices and taxes: quarterly statistics third quarter 2012, 2012.
33. Kaiser M.J., Pulsipher A.G. Ageneralized modeling framework for public benefit fund program valuation. Energy 2003, 28:519-538.
34. Han S.Y., Yoo S.H., Kwak S.J. The role of four electric power sectors in the Korean national economy: an input-output analysis. Energy Policy 2004, 32:1531-1543.
35. Carlsson F., Martinsson P. Does it matter when a power outage occurs? A choice experiment study on the willingness to pay to avoid power outages. Energy Econ 2008, 30:1232-1245.