Ultrasonic nondestructive evaluation systems: Models and measurements

Ultrasonic Nondestructive Evaluation Systems: Models and Measurements

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1-602

  Schmerr Jr , Lester W ^a   Song, Sung Jin ^b  

^a Iowa State University of Science and Technology   (United States)

^b Sungkyunkwan University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84891427612     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-49063-2     Document Type: Book

References (80)

1. Brown LF (2000) Design considerations for piezoelectric polymer ultrasound transducers. IEEE Trans. Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control 47:1377-1396
2. Dang CJ, Schmerr LW, Sedov A (2002) Modeling and measuring all the elements of an ultrasonic nondestructive evaluation system. I: Modeling foundations. Research in Nondestructive Evaluation 14:141-176
3. Dang CJ, Schmerr LW, Sedov A (2002) Modeling and measuring all the elements of an ultrasonic nondestructive evaluation system. II: Model-based measurements. Research in Nondestructive Evaluation 14:177-201
4. Ramos A, San Emterio JL, Sanz PT (2000) Dependence of pulser driving responses on electrical and motional characteristics of NDE ultrasonic probes. Ultrasonics 38:553-558
5. nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY
6. Magnusson PC, Alexander GC, Tripathi V (1992) Transmission lines and wave propagation, 3rd ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
7. Seshadre SR (1971) Fundamentals of transmission lines and electromagnetic fields. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA
8. Balanis CA (1989) Advanced engineering electromagnetics. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY
9. Staelin DH, Morgenthaler AW, Kong JA (1994) Electromagnetic waves. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
10. Bladel JV (1985) Electromagnetic fields. Hemisphere Publishing Co., New York, NY
11. Karmel PR, Colef GD, Camisa RL (1998) Introduction to electromagnetic and microwave engineering. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY
12. Foldy LL., Primakoff H (1945) A general theory of passive linear electroacoustic transducers and the electroacoustic reciprocal theorem. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 17:109-120
13. Primakoff H, Foldy LL (1947) A general theory of passive linear electroacoustic transducers and the electroacoustic reciprocal theorem, II. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 19:50-58
14. Dang, CJ, Schmerr LW, Sedov A (2002) Modeling and measuring all the elements of an ultrasonic nondestructive evaluation system I: Modeling foundations. Research in Nondestructive Evaluation 14:141-176
15. Sittig EK, (1967) Transmission parameters of thickness-driven piezoelectric transducers arranged in multilayer configurations. IEEE Trans. Sonics and Ultrasonics SU-14:167-174
16. Sittig EK (1969) Effects of bonding and electrode layers on the transmission parameters of piezoelectric transducers used in ultrasonic digital delay lines. IEEE Trans. Sonics and Ultrasonics SU-16:2-10
17. Mason WP (Ed.) (1964) Physical Acoustics, Vol. 1-Part A. Academic Press, New York, NY
18. Krimholtz R, Leedom DA, Matthaei GL (1970) New equivalent circuits for elementary piezoelectric transducers. Electronics Letters 16:398-399
19. Kino GS (1987) Acoustic Waves: Devices, Imaging, and Analog Signal Processing. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
20. Greenspan M (1979) Piston radiator: some extensions of the theory. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 65:608-621
21. Dang CJ, Schmerr LW, Sedov A (2002) Modeling and measuring all the elements of an ultrasonic nondestructive evaluation system. II: Model-based measurements. Research in Nondestructive Evaluation 14:177-201
22. Beissner K (1981) Exact integral expression for the diffraction loss of a circular piston. Acustica 19:21-217
23. Dang CJ, Schmerr LW, Sedov A (2002) Modeling and measuring all the elements of an ultrasonic nondestructive evaluation system. I: Modeling foundations. Research in Nondestructive Evaluation 14:141-176
24. Dang CJ, Schmerr LW, Sedov A (2002) Ultrasonic transducer sensitivity and model-based transducer characterization. Research in Nondestructive Evaluation 14:203-228
25. Dang CJ, Schmerr LW, Sedov A (2002) Modeling and measuring all the elements of an ultrasonic nondestructive evaluation system. II: Model-based measurements. Research in Nondestructive Evaluation 14:177-201
26. nd ed., Vols. 1, 2. Krieger Publishing Co., Malabar, FL
27. Lopez-Sanchez A, Schmerr LW (2006) Determination of an ultrasonic transducer's sensitivity and impedance in a pulse-echo setup. IEEE Trans. Ultrason., Ferroelect., Freq. Contr. 53:2101-2112
28. Bobber RJ (1960) Underwater electroacoustic measurements. Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC
29. MacLean WR (1940) Absolute measurement of sound without a primary standard. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 12:140-146
30. Cook RK (1941) Absolute pressure calibration of microphone. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 12:415-420
31. Di Mattia AL, Wiener FM (1946) On the absolute pressure calibration of condenser microphones by the reciprocity method. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 18:341-344
32. Ebaugh P, Mueser RE (1947) The practical application of the reciprocity theorem in the calibration of underwater sound transducers. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 19:695-700
33. Wathen-Dunn W (1949) On the reciprocity free-field calibration of microphones. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 21:542-546
34. Diestel HG (1961) Reciprocity calibration of microphones in a diffuse sound field. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 33:514-518
35. Hill EK, Egle DM (1980) A reciprocity technique for estimating the diffusefield sensitivity of piezoelectric transducers. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67:666-672-672
36. Vorlander M, Bietz H (1994) Novel broad-band reciprocity technique for simultaneous free-field and diffuse-field microphone calibration. Acustica 80:365-377
37. Product Data Sheet, Reciprocity Calibration System - Type 9699 - Brüel & Kjaer
38. Dang CJ, Schmerr LW, Sedov A (2002) Ultrasonic transducer sensitivity and model-based transducer characterization. Research in Nondestructive Evaluation 14:203-228
39. Carstensen EL (1947) Self-reciprocity calibration of electroacoustic transducers. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 19:961-965
40. White RM (1957) Self-reciprocity transducer calibration in a solid medium. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 29:834-836
41. Reid JM (1974) Self-reciprocity calibration of echo-ranging transducers. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 55:862-868
42. Widener MW (1980) The measurement of transducer efficiency using self reciprocity techniques. J. Acoust. Soc. Am, 67:1058-1060
43. Brendel K, Ludwig G (1976/77) Calibration of ultrasonic standard probe transducers. Acustica 36:203-208
44. Chivers RC, Bosselaar L, Filmore PR (1980) Effective area to be used in diffraction correction. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 68:80-84
45. Amin F, Gray TA, Margetan FJ (1991) A new method to estimate the effective geometrical focal length and radius of ultrasonic focused probes. In: Thompson DO, Chimenti DE (eds) Review of progress in quantitative nondestructive evaluation, 10A. Plenum Press, New York, NY, pp 861-865
46. Lerch T, Schmerr LW (1996) Characterization of spherically focused transducers using an ultrasonic measurement model approach. Res. Nondestr. Eval. 8:1-21
47. Dang CJ, Schmerr LW, Sedov A (2002) Modeling and measuring all the elements of an ultrasonic nondestructive evaluation system. II: Model-based measurements. Research in Nondestructive Evaluation 14:177-201
48. Schmerr LW, Song SJ, Zhang H (1994) Model-based calibration of ultrasonic system responses for quantitative measurements. In: Green RE Jr., Kozaczek KJ, Ruud CO (eds) Nondestructive characterization of materials, VI. Plenum Press, New York, NY, pp 111-118
49. Stamnes JJ (1986) Waves in focal regions. Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol, England
50. Gaskill JD (1978) Linear systems, Fourier transforms and optics. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY
51. O'Neil HT (1949) Theory of focusing radiators. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 21:516-526
52. Thompson RB, Gray TA (1982) Range of applicability of inversion algorithms. In: Thompson DO, Chimenti DE (eds) Review of progress in quantitative nondestructive evaluation 1, Plenum Press, New York, NY, pp 233-248
53. Chen X, Schwartz KQ (1994) Acoustic coupling from a focused transducer to a flat plate and back to the transducer. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95:3049-3054
54. Abramowitz M, Stegun IA (1965) Handbook of mathematical functions. Dover Publications, New York, NY
55. Siegman AE (1986) Lasers. University Science Books, Mill Valley, CA
56. Cerveny V (2001) Seismic ray theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom
57. Jeffreys A (1995) Handbook of mathematical formulas and integrals. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, p 48
58. Heyman E, Felsen LB (2001) Gaussian beam and pulsed-beam dynamics: complex-source and complex-spectrum formulations within and beyond paraxial asymptotics. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 18:1588-1611
59. Korn GA, Korn TM (1968) Mathematical handbook for scientists and engineers. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, NY
60. Cerveny V, Psencik I. (1983) Gaussian beams and paraxial ray approximation in three-dimensional inhomogeneous elastic media. Journal of Geophysics 53:1-15
61. Goldsmith PF (1998) Quasioptical systems. IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ
62. Wen JJ, Breazeale MA (1988) A diffraction beam field expressed as the superposition of Gaussian beams. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83:1752-1756
63. Wen JJ, Breazeale MA (1990) Computer optimization of the Gaussian beam description of an ultrasonic field. In: Lee D, Cakmak A, Vichnevetsky R. (eds) Computational acoustics: scattering, Gaussian beams, and aeroacoustics, Vol. 2. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp 181-196
64. Huang D, Breazeale MA (1999) A Gaussian finite-element method for description of sound diffraction. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106:1771-1781
65. Ding D, Zhang Y, Liu J (2003) Some extensions of the Gaussian beam expansion: radiation fields of rectangular and elliptical transducers. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113:3043-3048
66. Sha K, Yang J, Gan WS (2003) A complex virtual source approach for calculating the diffraction beam field generated by a rectangular planar source. IEEE Trans. on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control 50:890-896
67. Kim HJ, Schmerr LW, Sedov A (2006) Generation of the basis sets for multi-Gaussian ultrasonic beam models - an overview. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119:1971-1978
68. Auld BA (1979) General electromechanical reciprocity relations applied to the calculation of elastic wave scattering coefficients. Wave Motion 1:3-10
69. Thompson RB, Gray TA (1983) A model relating ultrasonic scattering measurements through liquid-solid interfaces to unbounded medium scattering amplitudes. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 74:140-146
70. Schmerr LW (2004) Fundamentals of ultrasonic measurement models. In: Lee SS, Yoon DJ, Lee JH, Lee S (eds) Advances in nondestructive evaluation. Trans Tech Publications Ltd, USA pp 402-409
71. Thompson DO, Chimenti DE (eds) Review of progress in quantitative nondestructive evaluation. Plenum Press, New York, NY/American Institute of Physics, Melville, NY. Past Volumes (1981-present)
72. Schmerr LW, Sedov A (2003) Modeling ultrasonic problems for the 2002 ultrasonic benchmark session. In: Thompson DO, Chimenti DE (eds) Review of progress in quantitative nondestructive evaluation 22B. American Institute of Physics, Melville, NY pp 1776-1783
73. Kim HJ, Schmerr LW, Song SJ, Sedov A (2003) Transferring distanceamplitude correction curves - a model-based approach. Journ. Korean Soc. NDT 23:605-615
74. Schmerr LW (2002) Ultrasonic modeling of benchmark problems. In: Thompson DO, Chimenti DE (eds) Review of progress in quantitative nondestructive evaluation 21. American Institute of Physics, Melville, NY, pp 1933-1940
75. Lopez AL, Kim HJ, Schmerr LW, Sedov A (2005) Measurement models and scattering models for predicting the ultrasonic pulse-echo response of sidedrilled holes. Journ. Nondestr. Eval. 24:83-96
76. Kim HJ, Park JS, Song SJ, Schmerr LW (2004) Modeling angle beam ultrasonic testing using multi-Gaussian beams. J. Nondestr. Eval. 23:81-93
77. th ed. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, pp 431-465
78. Song SJ, Kim JY, Kim YH (2002) Identification of flaw Signals in the angle beam ultrasonic testing of welded joints with geometric reflectors. In: Thompson DO, Chimenti DE (eds) Review of progress in quantitative nondestructive evaluation 21, American Institute of Physics, Melville, NY, pp 691-698
79. Jung HJ, Kim HJ, Song SJ, Kim YH (2003) Model-based enhancement of the TIFD for flaw signal identification in ultrasonic testing of welded joints. In: Thompson DO, Chimenti DE (eds) Review of progress in quantitative nondestructive evaluation 22. American Institute of Physics, Melville, NY, pp 628-634
80. Kim HJ, Song SJ, Kim YH (2003) Quantitative approaches to flaw sizing using ultrasonic testing models. In: Thompson DO, Chimenti DE (eds) Review of progress in quantitative nondestructive evaluation 22. American Institute of Physics, Melville, NY, pp 703-710