Incorporating Patients’ Preferences Into Medical Decision Making

Medical Care Research and Review

Volumn 70, Issue 1_suppl, 2013, Pages 80S-93S

  Fraenkel, Liana ^a,b  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b VA CONNECTICUT HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

best worst scaling; conjoint analysis; point of care clinical decision support

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RISK ASSESSMENT; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY;

COMMUNICATION; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84891426981     PISSN: 10775587     EISSN: 15526801     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1077558712461283     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Badia X. Roset M. Herdman M. (1999). Inconsistent responses in three preference-elicitation methods for health states. Social Science & Medicine, 49, 943-950.
2. Burge P. Devlin N. Appleby J. Rohr C. Grant J. (2004). Do patients always prefer quicker treatment? A discrete choice analysis of patients’ stated preferences in the London Patient Choice Project. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 3, 183-189.
3. Christofides N. J. Muirhead D. Jewkes R. K. Penn-Kekana L. Conco D. N. (2006). Women’s experiences of and preferences for services after rape in South Africa: Interview study. British Medical Journal, 332, 209-213.
4. Cook K. F. Ashton C. M. Byrne M. M. Brody B. Geraci J. Giesler R. B. Wray N. P. (2001). A psychometric analysis of the measurement level of the rating scale, time trade-off, and standard gamble. Social Science & Medicine, 53, 1275-1285.
5. Cotler S. J. Patil R. McNutt R. A. Speroff T. Banaad-Omiotek G. Ganger D. R. Jensen D. M. (2001). Patients’ values for health states associated with hepatitis C and physicians’ estimates of those values. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 96, 2730-2736.
6. Darba J. Restovic G. Kaskens L. Balbona M. A. Carbonell A. Cavero P. Padro I. (2011). Patient preferences for osteoporosis in Spain: A discrete choice experiment. Osteoporosis International, 22, 1947-1954.
7. Finn A. Louviere J. (1992). Determining the appropriate response to evidence of public concern: The case of food safety. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 11, 12-25.
8. Fraenkel L. (2010). Feasibility of using modified adaptive conjoint analysis importance questions. The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 3, 209-215.
9. Fraenkel L. Chodkowski D. Lim J. Garcia-Tsao G. (2010). Patients’ preferences for treatment of hepatitis C. Medical Decision Making, 30, 45-57.
10. Fraenkel L. Peters E. Charpentier P. Olsen B. Errante L. Schoen R. T. Reyna V. (2012). A decision tool to improve the quality of care in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care and Research (Hoboken), 64, 977-985.
11. Fraenkel L. Rabidou N. Wittink D. R. Fried T. (2007). Improving informed decision-making for patients with knee pain. Journal of Rheumatology, 34, 1894-1898.
12. Green P. E. Srinivasan V. (1990). Conjoint analysis in marketing: New developments with implications for research and practice. Journal of Marketing, 54, 3-17.
13. Hawley S. T. Volk R. J. Krishnamurthy P. Jibaja-Weiss M. Vernon S. W. Kneuper S. (2008). Preferences for colorectal cancer screening among racially/ethnically diverse primary care patients. Medical Care, 46, S10-S16.
14. Hill M. D. Foss M. M. Tu J. V. Feasby T. E. (2004). Factors influencing the decision to perform carotid endarterectomy. Neurology, 62, 803-805.
15. Hodgkins P. Swinburn P. Solomon D. Yen L. Dewilde S. Lloyd A. (2012). Patient preferences for first-line oral treatment for mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis: A discrete-choice experiment. The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 5, 33-44.
16. Howard K. Salkeld G. Pignone M. Hewett P. Cheung P. Olsen J. Roberts-Thomson I. C. (2011). Preferences for CT colonography and colonoscopy as diagnostic tests for colorectal cancer: A discrete choice experiment. Value in Health, 14, 1146-1152.
17. Imaeda A. Bender D. Fraenkel L. (2010). What is most important to patients when deciding about colorectal screening? Journal of General Internal Medicine, 25, 688-693.
18. King M. T. Viney R. Smith D. P. Hossain I. Street D. Savage E. Armstrong B. K. (2012). Survival gains needed to offset persistent adverse treatment effects in localised prostate cancer. British Journal of Cancer, 106, 638-645.
19. Lenert L. Kaplan R. M. (2000). Validity and interpretation of preference-based measures of health-related quality of life. Medical Care, 38(9 Supplement), II138-II150.
20. McIntosh E. Louviere J. (2002). Separating weight and scale value: An exploration of best-attribute scaling in health economics. Paper presented at the Health Economists’ Study Group meeting, Brunel University, London.
21. Orme B. (n.d.). Sawtooth software. Retrieved from http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/download/techpap/acatech.pdf
22. Orme B. (2010). Market simulators for conjoint analysis. Getting started with conjoint analysis: Strategies for product design and pricing research (2nd ed.). Madison, WI: Research Publishers.
23. Phillips K. A. Maddala T. Johnson F. R. (2002). Measuring preferences for health care interventions using conjoint analysis: An application to HIV testing. Health Services Research, 37, 1681-1705.
24. Ryan M. Gerard K. (2003). Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programs: Current practice and future research reflections. Applied Health and Economic Health Policy, 2, 55-64.
25. Schwappach D. L. B. Strasmann T. J. (2007). Does location matter? A study of the public’s preferences for surgical care provision. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 13, 259-264.
26. Solomon D. A. Rabidou N. Kulkarni S. Formica R. Fraenkel L. (2011). Accepting a donor kidney: An evaluation of patients’ and transplant surgeons’ priorities. Clinical Transplantation, 25, 786-793.
27. Souchek J. Stacks J. R. Brody B. Ashton C. M. Giesler R. B. Byrne M. M. Wray N. P. (2000). A trial for comparing methods for eliciting treatment preferences from men with advanced prostate cancer: Results from the initial visit. Medical Care, 38, 1040-1050.
28. Srinivasan V. Park C. S. (1997). Surprising robustness of the self-explicated approach to customer preference structure measurement. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 286-291.
29. Tsevat J. Dawson N. V. Wu A. W. Lynn J. Soukup J. R. Cook E. F. Phillips R. S. (1998). Health values of hospitalized patients 80 years or older. HELP Investigators. Hospitalized Elderly Longitudinal Project. Journal of the American Medical Association, 279, 371-375.
30. Whitney S. N. McGuire A. L. McCullough L. B. (2004). A typology of shared decision making, informed consent, and simple consent. Annals of Internal Medicine, 140, 54-59.
31. Wittink D. R. Bergenstuen T. (2001). Forecasting with conjoint analysis. In Armstrong J. S.(Ed.), Principles of forecasting: A handbook for researchers and practitioners (pp. 147-167). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
32. Woolf S. H. Chan E. C. Y. Harris R. Sheridan S. L. Braddock C. H. Kaplan R. M. Tunis S. (2005). Promoting informed choice: Transforming health care to dispense knowledge for decision making. Annals of Internal Medicine, 143, 293-300.
33. Wright P. (1975). Consumer choice strategies: Simplifying vs. optimizing. Journal of Marketing Research, 12, 60-67.