Finding the appropriate generalization level for binary ontological relations extracted from the genia corpus

Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2006

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 191-196

  Cimiano, P ^a   Hartung, M ^a   Ratsch, E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KARLSRUHE   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINS; SEMANTICS;

BINARY RELATION; CONCEPT HIERARCHIES; GOLD STANDARDS; LEVEL OF ABSTRACTION; ONTOLOGY LEARNING; SEMANTIC RELATIONS; SUBCATEGORIZATION; SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 84891405866     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. S. Abney. 1996. Partial parsing via finite-state cascades. In Proceedings of the ESSLLI '96 Robust Parsing Workshop, pages 8-15.
2. M. Ciaramita, A. Gangemi, E. Ratsch, J. Saric, and I. Rojas. 2005. Unsupervised learning of semantic relations between concepts of a molecular biology ontology. In Proceedings of IJCAI'05, pages 659-664.
3. S. Clark and D.J. Weir. 2002. Class-based probability estimation using a semantic hierarchy. Computational Linguistics, 28(2):187-206.
4. D. Faure and C. Nedellec. 1998. A corpus-based conceptual clustering method for verb frames and ontology. In Proceedings of the LREC Workshop on Adapting lexical and corpus resources to sublanguages and applications, pages 5-12.
5. U. Hahn and K. Schnattinger. 1998. Towards text knowledge engineering. In Proceedings of AAAI'98/IAAI'98, pages 524-531.
6. M. Kavalec and V. Svátek. 2005. A study on automated relation labelling in ontology learning. In Ontology Learning from Text: Methods, Evaluation and Applications, number 123 in Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, pages 44-58. IOS Press.
7. H. Li and N. Abe. 1998. Generalizing case frames using a thesaurus and the MDL principle. Computational Linguistics, 24(2):217-244.
8. D. Lin and P. Pantel. 2001. Discovery of inference rules for question answering. Natural Language Engineering, 7(4):343-360.
9. A. Mädche and S. Staab. 2000. Discovering conceptual relations from text. In Proceedings of ECAI, pages 321-325.
10. C. Manning and H. Schütze. 1999. Foundations of Statistical Language Processing. MIT Press.
11. D. McCarthy. 1997. Word sense disambiguation for acquisition of selectional preferences. In Automatic Information Extraction and Building of Lexical Semantic Resources for NLP Applications, pages 52-60. Association for Computational Linguistics.
12. T. Ohta, Y. Tateisi, and J. Kim. 2002. The GENIA corpus: an annotated research abstract corpus in molecular biology domain. In Proceedings of the 10th Internationl Conference on Human Language Technology (HLT).
13. P. Resnik. 1997. Selectional preference and sense disambiguation. In Proceedings of the ACL SIGLEX Workshop on Tagging Text with Lexical Semantics: Why, What, and How?
14. F. Ribas. 1995. On learning more appropriate selectional restrictions. In Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the European chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL), pages 112-118.
15. A. Schutz and P. Buitelaar. 2005. Relext: A tool for relation extraction from text in ontology extension. In Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Conference, pages 593-606.
16. H. Schütze. 1993. Word space. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 5, pages 895-902.
17. T. Yamaguchi. 2001. Acquring conceptual relationships from domain-specific texts. In Proceedings of the IJCAI Workshop on Ontology Learning.