Do educational facilities affect housing price? An empirical study inHangzhou, China

Habitat International

Volumn 42, Issue , 2014, Pages 155-163

  Wen, Haizhen ^a   Zhang, Yan ^a   Zhang, Ling ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Capitalization rate; Educational facilities; Hedonic price model; Housing price; Spatial econometric model

Indexed keywords

ACCESSIBILITY; CAPITAL MARKET; ECONOMETRICS; EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT; HEDONIC ANALYSIS; HOUSING MARKET; PRICE DYNAMICS; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

CHINA; HANGZHOU; ZHEJIANG;

EID: 84891366425     PISSN: 01973975     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.12.004     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Anselin L. Spatial externalities and spatial econometrics. International Regional Science Review 2003, 26(2):153-166.
2. Black S.E. Do better school matter? Parental value of elementary education. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 1999, 114(2):577-599.
3. Brasington D.M. Which measures of school quality does the housing market value? Spatial and non-spatial evidence. Journal of Real Estate Research 1999, 18(3):395-413.
4. Brasington D.M., Haurin D.R. Educational outcomes and house values: a test of the value-added approach. Journal of Regional Science 2006, 46(2):245-268.
5. Chen Y., Liu S.Z. The effect of university on surrounding housing price-a case study on Zhejiang university. Journal of Zhejiang Ocean University (Humane Science) 2010, 27(3):148-151.
6. Cheshire P., Sheppard S. Capitalizing the value of free schools: the impact of supply characteristics and uncertainty. Economic Journal 2004, 114(499):397-424.
7. Chin H.C., Foong K.W. Influence of school accessibility on housing values. Journal of Urban Planning and Development 2006, 132(3):120-129.
8. Clark D.E., Herrin W.E. The impact of public school attributes on home sale prices in California. Growth and Change 2000, 31(3):385-407.
9. Downes T.A., Zabel J.E. The impact of school characteristics on house prices: Chicago 1987-1991. Journal of Urban Economics 2002, 52(1):1-25.
10. Dubin R. Robustness of spatial autocorrelation specifications: some Monte Carlo evidence. Journal of Regional Science 2003, 43(2):221-248.
11. Fack G., Grenet J. When do better schools raise housing prices? Evidence from Paris public and private schools. Journal of Public Economics 2010, 94(1):59-77.
12. Feng H., Lu M. Choose a school through buying a house: evidences and policy implications of how education effect the housing price. World Economy 2010, 12:89-104.
13. Figlio D.N., Lucas M.E. What's in a grade? School report cards and the housing market. American Economic Review 2004, 94(3):591-604.
14. Fingleton B. Across-sectional analysis of residential property prices: the effects of income, commuting, schooling, the housing stock and spatial interaction in the English regions. Papers in Regional Science 2006, 85(3):339-361.
15. Gibbons S., Machin S. Paying for primary schools: admission constraints, school popularity or congestion?. Economic Journal 2006, 116(510):77-92.
16. Gibbons S., Machin S., Silva O. Valuing school quality using boundary discontinuities 2009, Working paper, Spatial Economics Research Centre.
17. Gibbons S., Machin S. Valuing English primary schools. Journal of Urban Economics 2003, 53(2):197-219.
18. Haurin D.R., Brasington D.M. School quality and real house prices: inter and intrametropolitan effects. Journal of Housing Economics 1996, 5:351-368.
19. Hayes K.J., Lori L.T. Neighborhood school characteristics: what signals quality to homebuyers?. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Economic Review 1996, 3:2-9.
20. Huang B.R. The impact of education facilities on the surrounding housing price: an investigation on attached primary school zoning. Consumer Guide 2010, 2:58-60.
21. Jud G.D., Watts J.M. Schools and housing values. Land Economics 1981, 57(3):459-470.
22. Kane T.J., Staiger D.O., Samms G. School accountability ratings and housing values. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs 2003, 4:83-137.
23. Li X., Fu W.Y. An investigation on the capitalization of urban government infrastructure investment in housing market. Geographical Research 2010, 29(7):1269-1280.
24. Liang R.B., Tang Y. Tiebout model in the supply of local public goods: an empirical study based on urban housing price in China. World Economy 2008, 10:71-83.
25. Lu C.Y. Astudy on the effect of local public goods capitalization in China 2010, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou.
26. Militino A., Ugarte M., Garcia-Reinaldos L. Alternative models for describing spatial dependence among dwelling selling prices. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 2004, 29(2):193-209.
27. Oates W.E. The effects of property taxes and local public spending on property values: an empirical study of tax capitalization on the Tiebout hypothesis. Journal of Political Economy 1969, 77(6):957-971.
28. Osland L. An application of spatial econometrics in relation to hedonic house price modelling. Journal of Real Estate Research 2010, 32(3):289-320.
29. Owusu-Edusei K., Espey M., Lin H. Does close count? School proximity, school quality, and residential property values. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 2007, 39(1):211-221.
30. Phuong Nguyen-Hoang, Yinger The capitalization of school quality into house values: a review. Journal of Housing Economics 2011, 20:30-48.
31. Rosen H.S., Fullerton D.J. Anote on local tax rates, public benefit levels, and property values. Journal of Political Economy 1977, 85(2):433-440.
32. Rosenthal L. The value of secondary school quality. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 2003, 65(3):329-355.
33. Sedgley N.H., Williams N.A., Derrick F.W. The effect of educational test scores on house prices in a model with spatial dependence. Journal of Housing Economics 2008, 17(2):191-200.
34. Seo Y., Simons R. The effect of school quality on residential sales price. Journal of Real Estate Research 2009, 31(3):307-327.
35. Shi Y.S., Guo H.N. The spatial effect of large park on housing price-use Huangxing park of Shanghai as a case. Geographical Research 2010, 29(3):510-520.
36. Shi Y.S., Zhang R. The spatial effect of Shanghai south railway station on housing price. Journal of Geographical Science 2009, 64(2):167-176.
37. Tiebout C.M. Apure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy 1956, 64(5):416-424.
38. Wang S.T., Zheng S.Q., Feng J. The accessibility of public services and the impact on housing price: using the central city of Beijing as a case. Progress in Geography 2007, 26(6):78-85.
39. Wang X., Ge J.S. Astudy on the price mechanism of school zoning in the old city of Nanjing. Cooperation Economic and Technology 2010, 2:10-13.
40. Wang X.Y. Astudy on the housing hedonic price of Shanghai based on the hedonic model 2006, Tongji University, Shanghai.
41. Wen H.Z., Jia S.H. Housing characteristics and hedonic price: based on hedonic price model. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science) 2004, 38(10):38-42.
42. Xu Y. An empirical study on the effect range of university on surrounding housing price. China Commodity Prices 2009, 4:39-41.
43. Zahirovic-Herbert V., Turnbull G.K. School quality, house prices and liquidity. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 2008, 37(2):113-130.
44. Zahirovic-Herbert V., Turnbull G.K. Public school reform, expectations, and capitalization: what signals quality to homebuyers?. Southern Economic Journal 2009, 75(4):1094-1113.
45. Zhang H., Ma J.J., Zhu H.L. The impact of urban rail transit on the price of housing project. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University (Natural Science Edition) 2007, 31(3):10-13.
46. Zhang J. The analysis of school district economic value of Pudong new area in Shanghai. Science and Wealth 2010, 4:77-78.
47. Zheng J.F., Liu H.Y. The impact of subway construction in Shenzhen on the surrounding housing price. Journal of Railway 2005, 27(5):11-18.
48. Zhou J.K., Wu X.Y. The study of premium effect of public investment on housing market: based on the data examination of 30 provinces in China. World Economic Forum 2009, 1:15-32.