Long-term effect of September 11 on the political behavior of victims' families and neighbors

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 110, Issue 52, 2013, Pages 20959-20963

  Hersh, Eitan D ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Big data; Matching; Political participation; Terrorism; Voting

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR CHANGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FAMILY; GOVERNMENT; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; NEIGHBORHOOD; POLITICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TERRORISM;

EID: 84891360928     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1315043110     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Schuster MA, et al. (2001) A national survey of stress reactions after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. N Engl J Med 345(20): 1507-1512.
2. Schlenger WE, et al. (2002) Psychological reactions to terrorist attacks: Findings from the National Study of Americans' Reactions to September 11. JAMA 288(5): 581-588.
3. Ford CA, Udry JR, Gleiter K, Chantala K (2003) Reactions of young adults to September 11, 2001. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 157(6): 572-578.
4. Bonanno GA, Jost JT (2006) Conservative shift among high-exposure survivors of the September 11th terrorist attacks. Basic Appl Soc Psych 28(4): 311-323.
5. Huddy L, Feldman S, Taber C, Lahav G (2005) Threat, anxiety, and support of antiterrorism policies. Am J Pol Sci 49(3): 593-608.
6. Huddy L, Feldman S (2011) Americans respond politically to 9/11: Understanding the impact of the terrorist attacks and their aftermath. Am Psychol 66(6): 455-467.
7. Jost JT, Glaser J, Kruglanski AW, Sulloway FJ (2003) Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychol Bull 129(3): 339-375.
8. Baumgartner FR, Jones BD (1993) Agendas and Instability in American Politics (Univ of Chicago Press, Chicago).
9. Bateson R (2012) Crime victimization and political participation. Am Polit Sci Rev 106(3): 570-587.
10. Gasper JT, Reeves A (2011) Make it rain? Retrospection and the attentive electorate in the context of natural disasters. Am J Pol Sci 55(2): 340-355.
11. Healy A, Malhotra N (2010) Random events, economic losses, and retrospective voting: Implications for Democratic competence. Q J Polit Sci 5(4): 193-208.
12. Fraga B, Hersh E (2010) Voting costs and voter turnout in competitive elections. Q J Polit Sci 5(4): 339-356.
13. Ansolabehere S, Hersh E (2012) Validation: What survey misreporting reveal about survey misreporting and the real electorate. Polit Anal 20(4): 437-459.
14. Silver RC, Holman EA, McIntosh DN, Poulin M, Gil-Rivas V (2002) Nationwide longitudinal study of psychological responses to September 11. JAMA 288(10): 1235-1244.
15. Hopkins DJ (2010) Politicized places: Explaining where and when immigrants provoke local opposition. Am Polit Sci Rev 104(1): 40-60.
16. Gigerenzer G (2006) Out of the frying pan into the fire: Behavioral reactions to terrorist attacks. Risk Anal 26(2): 347-351.
17. Laufer A, Solomon Z (2006) Posttraumatic symptoms and posttraumatic growth among Israeli youth exposed to terror incidents. J Soc Clin Psychol 25(4): 429-447.
18. Blattman C (2009) From violence to voting: War and political participation in Uganda. Am Polit Sci Rev 103(3): 231-247.
19. Pyszczynski T, Solomon S, Greenberg J (2003) In the Wake of 9/11: The Psychology of Terror (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC).
20. Bonica A (2013) Ideology and interests in the political marketplace. Am J Pol Sci 57(2): 294-311.
21. Hersh E (2012) Primary voters versus caucus goers and the peripheral motivations of political participation. Polit Behav 34(4): 689-718.
22. Rosenstone SJ, Hansen JM (1993) Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America (Macmillan, New York).
23. Feinberg KR (2005) What is Life Worth? The Unprecedented Effort to Compensate the Victims of 9/11 (PublicAffairs, New York).