A fiber-optic redox sensor for the iron(III)-iron(II) transition

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

Volumn 186, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 415-420

  Chudyk, Wayne ^a   Sotolongo, Christine ^a   Mueller, Eric ^a  

^a Tufts University   (United States)

Author keywords

Fiber optic sensor; Iron III II transition; Phenosafranine; Redox potential

Indexed keywords

FIBEROPTIC PROBES; NAFION FILM; OPTICAL ABSORBANCE; PHENOSAFRANINE; REDOX CONDITION; REDOX POTENTIALS; REDOX SENSITIVES; REDOX SENSOR;

CHLORINE COMPOUNDS; FIBER OPTICS; OPTICAL PROPERTIES; REDOX REACTIONS; SECONDARY BATTERIES; SENSORS;

IRON COMPOUNDS;

3,7 DIAMINO 5 PHENYLPHENAZINIUM CHLORIDE; DYE; FERRIC ION; FERROUS ION; NAFION; NITROGEN; PHENOSAFRANINE; SULFONIC ACID DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADSORPTION; ANION; CATION; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; ELECTRODE; IRON; OPTICAL PROPERTY; REDOX CONDITIONS; REDOX POTENTIAL;

AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; FIBER OPTIC REDOX SENSOR; FILM; LIGHT ABSORPTION; MECHANICAL PROBE; OXIDATION REDUCTION POTENTIAL; OXIDATION REDUCTION REACTION; PH; SENSOR;

EID: 84891344054     PISSN: 01676369     EISSN: 15732959     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-013-3386-x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Atteia, O., & Guillot, C. (2007). Factors controlling BTEX and chlorinated solvents plume length under natural attenuation conditions. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 90, 81-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2006.09.012.
2. Bakker, E., & Qin, Y. (2006). Electrochemical sensors. Analytical Chemistry, 78, 3965-3983. doi: 10.1021/ac060637m.
3. Barbieri, M., Carrera, J., Sanchez-Vila, X., Ayora, C., Cama, J., Köck-Schulmeyer, M., et al. (2011). Microcosm experiments to control anaerobic redox conditions when studying the fate of organic micropollutants in aquifer material. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 126, 330-345. doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2011.09.003.
4. Borch, T., Kretzschmar, R., Kappler, A., van Cappellen, P., Ginder-Vogel, M., Voegelin, A., et al. (2010). Biogeochemical redox processes and their impact on contaminant dynamics. Environmental Science and Technology, 44, 15-23. doi: 10.1021/es9026248.
5. Bowler, P. G., Duerben, B. I., & Armstrong, D. G. (2001). Wound microbiology and associated approaches to wound management. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 14(2), 244-269.
6. Christensen, T. H., Bjerg, P. L., Banwart, S. A., Jakobsen, R., Heron, G., & Albrechtsen, H. (2000). Characterization of redox conditions in groundwater contaminant plumes. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 45, 165-241. doi: 10.1016/S0169-7722(00)00109-1.
7. Chudyk, W. (1989). Fiber optic methods for volatile organic compounds in groundwater. In N. M. Ram, R. F. Christman, & K. P. Cantor (Eds.), Significance and treatment of volatile organic compounds in water supplies (pp. 87-99). Chelsea: Lewis.
8. Feidler, S., Vepraskas, M., & Richardson, J. (2007). Soil redox potential: importance, field measurements, and observations. Advances in Agronomy, 94, 1-54. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2113(06)94001-2.
9. Gopidas, K. R., & Kamat, P. V. (1991). Photochemistry in polymers. Photoinduced electron transfer between phenosafranine and triethylamine in perfluorosulfonate membrane. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 94, 4726-4727. doi: 10.1021/j100374a064.
10. Hinchey, E. K., & Schaffner, L. C. (2005). An evaluation of electrode insertion techniques for measurement of redox potential in estuarine sediments. Chemosphere, 59, 703-710. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.10.029.
11. Jones, B. D., & Ingle, J. D., Jr. (2005). Evaluation of redox indicators for determining sulfate-reducing and dechlorinating conditions. Water Research, 39, 4343-4354. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.09.006.
12. Kierat, R. M., Thaler, B. M. B., & Krämer, R. (2010). A fluorescent redox sensor with tuneable oxidation potential. Bioorganica Medical Chemistry Letter, 20, 1457-1459. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2009.03.171.
13. Komura, T., Niu, G. Y., Yamaguchi, T., & Asano, M. (2003). Redox and ionic-binding switched fluorescence of phenosafranine and thionine included in Nafion films. Electrochimica Acta, 48, 631-639. doi: 10.1016/S0013-4686(02) 00733-8.
14. Lemmon, T. L., Westall, J. C., & Ingle, J. D., Jr. (1996). Development of redox sensors for environmental applications based on immobilized redox indicators. Analytische Chemie, 68, 947-953. doi: 10.1021/ac950885a.
15. Maineult, A., Bernabé, Y., & Ackerer, P. (2006). Detection of advected, reacting redox fronts from self-potential measurements. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 86, 32-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2006.02.007.
16. Masscheleyn, P. H., Delaune, R. D., & Patrick, W. H., Jr. (1991). Effect of redox potential and ph on arsenic speciation and solubility in a contaminated soil. Environmental Science and Technology, 25, 1414-1419. doi: 10.1021/es00020a008.
17. Miehr, R., Tratnyek, P. G., Bandstra, J. Z., Scherer, M. M., Alowitz, M. J., & Bylaska, E. J. (2004). Diversity of contaminant reduction reactions by zerovalent iron: role of the reductate. Environmental Science and Technology, 38, 139-147. doi: 10.1021/es034237h.
18. Newcombe, D. T., Cardwell, T. J., Cattrall, R. W., & Kolev, S. D. (1999). An optical redox chemical sensor based on ferroin immobilised in a Nafion® membrane. Analytica Chimica Acta, 401, 137-144. doi: 10.1016/S0003-2670(99)00474-2.
19. Newcombe, D. T., Cardwell, T. J., Cattrall, R. W., & Kolev, S. D. (2000). An optical membrane redox chemical sensor for the determination of ascorbic acid. Laboratory Rob. Automated, 12(4), 200-204. doi: 10.1002/1098-2728(2000)12:4<200:AID-LRA5>3.0.CO;2-2.
20. Owens, P. R., Wilding, L. P., Lee, L. M., & Herbert, B. E. (2005). Evaluation of platinum electrodes and three electrode potential standards to determine electrode quality. Soil Science Society American Journal, 69, 1541-1550. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2003.0205.
21. Passos, M. L. C., Saraiva, M. L. M. F. S., & Lima, J. L. F. C. (2010). A thionine-based reversible redox sensor in a sequential injection system. Analytica Chimica Acta, 668, 41-46. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2010.01.060.
22. Ruiz-Haas, P., & Ingle, J. D., Jr. (2007). Monitoring redox conditions with flow-based and fiber-optic sensors based on redox indicators: application to reductive dehalogenation in a bioaugmented soil column. Geomicrobiology Journal, 24, 365-378. doi: 10.1080/01490450701459226.
23. Ryu, J., Dahlgren, R. A., Gao, S., & Tanji, K. K. (2004). Characterization of redox processes in shallow groundwater of Owens Dry Lake, California. Environmental Science and Technology, 38, 5950-5957. doi: 10.1021/es0306112.
24. Seiler, K., & Simon, W. (1992). Theoretical aspects of bulk optode membranes. Analytica Chimica Acta, 266, 73-87. doi: 10.1016/0003-2670(92)85281- A.
25. Sotolongo, C. (2010), Fiber Optic Redox Sensors for In-Situ Environmental Sampling, M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil & Env. Eng., Tufts University, Medford, MA.
26. Tratnyek, P. G., Reilkoff, T. E., Lemon, A. W., Scherer, M. M., Balko, B. A., Feik, L. M., et al. (2001). Visualizing redox chemistry: probing environmental oxidation. Reduction reactions with indicator dyes. Chemistry Educator, 6, 172-179. doi: 10.1007/s00897010471a.
27. Van Bochove, E., Beauchemin, S., & Thériault, G. (2002). Continuous multiple measurement of soil redox potential using platinum microelectrodes. Soil Science Society American Journal, 66, 1813-1820. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2002.1813.
28. Zhao, L., Wu, T., Lefèvre, J., Leray, I., & Delaire, J. A. (2009). Fluorimetric lead detection in a microfluidic device. Lab on a Chip, 9, 2818-2823. doi: 10.1039/B904641K.