Predicting DUI Decisions in Different Legal Environments: Investigating Deterrence With a Conjoint Experiment

Traffic Injury Prevention

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 213-221

  Yao, Jie ^a   Johnson, Mark B ^a   Beck, Kenneth H ^b  

^a PACIFIC INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH AND EVALUATION   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

conjoint experiment; decision making; DUI; general deterrence; legal risks

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CAR DRIVING; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; LAW ENFORCEMENT; LEGAL ASPECT; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PUNISHMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

ALCOHOL DRINKING; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAW ENFORCEMENT; MALE; MARYLAND; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PUNISHMENT; RESEARCH DESIGN; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84891310495     PISSN: 15389588     EISSN: 1538957X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15389588.2013.808338     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Allenby, G M and Rossi, P E. 2006. " Hierarchical Bayes models ". In The Handbook of Marketing Research: Uses, Misuses, and Future Advances, Edited by: Grover, R and Vriens, M. 418 - 440. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
2. Benson, B, Mast, B and Rasmussen, D. 2000. Can police deter drunk driving?. Appl Econ., 32: 357 - 366.
3. Cohen, SH. 2003. Maximum Difference Scaling: Improved Measures of Importance and Preference for Segmentation, Sequim, WA: Sawtooth Software. Available at: http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/download/techpap/maxdiff.pdf
4. Dang, JN. 2008. Statistical Analysis of Alcohol-Related Driving Trends, 1982-2005, Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. DOT HS 810 942. Available at: http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/810942.pdf
5. Dean, A M and Voss, D. 1999. Design and Analysis of Experiments, New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media.
6. Drew, L, Royal, D, Moulton, B, Peterson, A and Haddix, D. 2010. Volume I: Summary Report-National Survey of Drinking and Driving Attitudes and Behaviors: 2008, Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Report No. DOT HS 811 342
7. Dula, C S, Dwyer, W O and LeVerne, G. 2007. Policing the drunk driver: measuring law enforcement involvement in reducing alcohol-impaired driving. J Safety Res., 38: 267 - 272.
8. Elder, R W, Shults, R A, Sleet, D A, Nichols, J L, Zaza, S and Thompson, R S. 2002. Effectiveness of sobriety checkpoints for reducing alcohol-involved crashes. Traffic Inj Prev., 3: 266 - 274.
9. Fell, J C, Fisher, D A, Voas, R B, Blackman, K and Tippetts, A S. 2008. The relationship of underage drinking laws to reductions in drinking drivers in fatal crashes in the United States. Accid Anal Prev., 40: 1430 - 1440.
10. Fell, J C, Tippetts, A S and Levy, M. 2008. Evaluation of seven publicized enforcement demonstration programs to reduce impaired driving: Georgia, Louisiana, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Indiana, and Michigan. Ann Adv Automot Med., 52: 23 - 38.
11. Hedlund, J H and McCartt, A T. 2002. Drunk Driving: Seeking Additional Solutions, Washington, DC: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety.
12. Higgins, L M, Shaw, W D and Egbendewe-Mondzozo, A. 2011. Attributes affecting preferences for traffic safety camera programs. Accid Anal Prev., 43: 1042 - 1048.
13. Hingson, R, Winter, M and Heeren, T. Alcohol and drug use in fatally injured drivers in states that test over 80% for both alcohol and drugs. Paper presented at: Tri-Annual Meeting of the International Conference on Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety, pp. 22 - 26. Oslo, Norway August
14. Homel, R. 1988. Policing and Punishing the Drinking Driver. A Study of General and Specific Deterrence, New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
15. Lacey, J, Kelley-Baker, T and Furr-Holden, CDM. 2009. 2007 National Roadside Survey of Alcohol and Drug Use by Drivers: Alcohol Results, Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. DOT HS 811 248. Available at: http://www.nhtsa.gov/Driving+Safety/Research+&+Evaluation/2007+National+Roadside+Survey+of+Alcohol+and+Drug+Use+by+Drivers
16. Louviere, J, Hensher, D and Swait, J. 2000. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
17. Nagin, D S and Pogarsky, G. 2001. Integrating celerity, impulsivity, and extralegal sanction threats into a model of general deterrence: theory and evidence. Criminology., 39: 865 - 892.
18. National Center for Statistics and Analysis. 2012. " Alcohol-impaired driving ". In Traffic Safety Facts: 2010 Data, Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Available at: http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811606.pdf
19. Orme, B. 2000. Hierarchical Bayes: Why All the Attention?, Sequim, WA: Sawtooth Software. Available at: http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/download/techpap/hbwhy.pdf
20. Orme, B. 2010. Understanding the Value of Conjoint Analysis-Getting Started With Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research. 2nd ed., Madison, WI: Research Publishers LLC.
21. Paternoster, R and Piquero, A. 1995. Reconceptualizing deterrence: an empirical test of personal and vicarious experiences. J Res Crime Delinq., 32: 251 - 286.
22. Piquero, A and Paternoster, R. 1998. An application of Stafford and Warr's reconceptualization of deterrence to drinking and driving. J Res Crime Delinq., 35: 3 - 40.
23. Piquero, A R, Paternoster, R, Pogarsky, G and Loughran, T. 2011. Elaborating the individual difference component in deterrence theory. Ann Rev Law Soc Sci., 7: 335 - 360.
24. Rizzi, L I and Ortúzar, J D. 2003. Stated preference in the valuation of interurban road safety. Accid Anal Prev., 35: 9 - 22.
25. Ross, H L. 1984. Social control through deterrence: drinking-and-driving laws. Ann Rev Sociol., 10: 21 - 35.
26. Ross, H L. 1992. Are DWI sanctions effective?. Alcohol Drugs Driving., 8: 61 - 69.
27. Ross, L and Voas, R B. 1990a. " The effects of extraordinarily severe sentences for drunken driving in an American jurisdiction ". In Alcohol, Drugs & Traffic Safety-T89. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety, October 24-27, 1989, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A, Edited by: Perrine, M WB. 734 - 736. Chicago, IL: National Safety Council.
28. Ross, H L and Voas, R B. 1990b. The new Philadelphia story: the effects of severe punishment for drunk driving. Law Policy., 12: 51 - 79.
29. Shults, R A, Elder, R W Sleet, D A. 2001. Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to reduce alcohol-impaired driving. Am J Prev Med., 21: 66 - 88.
30. So, Y and Kuhfeld, W F. 1995. Multinomial logit models (MR-2010G). Available at: http://support.sas.com/techsup/technote/mr2010g.pdf
31. " Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration ". In Summary Findings From the 1999 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, Rockville, MD: Office of Applied Studies, US Department of Health and Human Services. DHHS Publication No. [SMA] 00- 3466. 2000.
32. " Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration ". In Results From the 2001 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Volume I, Summary of National Findings, Rockville, MD: Office of Applied Studies, US Department of Health and Human Services. NHSDA Series H-17, DHHS Publication No. SMA 02-3758. 2002.
33. " Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration ". Rockville, MD: Office of Applied Studies, US Department of Health and Human Services. Results From the 2005 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings SMA 06-4194. 2006.
34. " The Task Force on Community Preventive Services ". 2012. In Motor Vehicle-Related Injury Prevention: Reducing Alcohol-Impaired Driving, Atlanta, GA: Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Available at: http://www.thecommunityguide.org/mvoi/aid/index.html
35. Thombs, D L, Olds, R S and Snyder, B M. 2003. Field assessment of BAC data to study late-night college drinking. J Stud Alcohol., 64: 322 - 330.
36. Tippetts, A S, Voas, R B, Fell, J C and Nichols, J L. 2005. A meta-analysis of.08 BAC laws in 19 jurisdictions in the United States. Accid Anal Prev., 37: 149 - 161.
37. Voas, R B, Tippetts, A S and Fell, J C. 2000. The relationship of alcohol safety laws to drinking drivers in fatal crashes. Accid Anal Prev., 32: 483 - 492.
38. Voas, R B, Tippetts, A S and Fell, J. 2003. Assessing the effectiveness of minimum legal drinking age and zero tolerance laws in the United States. Accid Anal Prev., 35: 579 - 587.
39. Wagenaar, A C and Maldonado-Molina, M M. 2007. Effects of drivers' license suspension policies on alcohol-related crash involvement: long-term follow-up in forty-six states. Alcohol Clin Exp Res., 31: 1399 - 1406.
40. Wagenaar, A C, Maldonado-Molina, M M, Erickson, D J, Ma, L, Tobler, A L and Komro, K A. 2007. General deterrence effects of US statutory DUI fine and jail penalties: long-term follow-up in 32 states. Accid Anal Prev., 39: 982 - 994.
41. Wagenaar, A, Maldonado-Molina, M, Ma, L, Tobler, A and Komro, K. 2007. Effects of legal BAC limits on fatal crash involvement: analyses of 28 states from 1976 through 2002. J Safety Res., 38: 493 - 499.
42. Wagenaar, A C and Toomey, T L. 2002. Effects of minimum drinking age laws: review and analyses of the literature from 1960 to 2000. J Stud Alcohol.,: 206 - 225.
43. Williams, A F and Lund, A K. 1984. Deterrent effects of roadblocks on drinking and driving. Traffic Safety Eval Res Rev., 3: 7 - 18.