Competitive dominance of the invasive plant Impatiens glandulifera: Using competitive effect and response with a vigorous neighbour

Biological Invasions

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 141-151

  Gruntman, Michal ^a   Pehl, Anne Katrin ^a   Joshi, Srijana ^a,b   Tielbörger, Katja ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR INTEGRATED MOUNTAIN DEVELOPMENT   (Nepal)

Author keywords

Activated carbon; Allelopathy; Biological invasions; Competitive effect and response; Impatiens glandulifera; Urtica dioica

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATED CARBON; ALLELOPATHY; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; COEXISTENCE; CONSPECIFIC; DICOTYLEDON; DOMINANCE; INVASIVE SPECIES; PLANT COMMUNITY;

IMPATIENS; IMPATIENS GLANDULIFERA; URTICA DIOICA;

EID: 84891153635     PISSN: 13873547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-013-0509-9     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Alpert P (2006) The advantages and disadvantages of being introduced. Biol Invasions 8(7): 1523-1534.
2. Armas C, Ordiales R, Pugnaire FI (2004) Measuring plant interactions: a new comparative index. Ecology 85(10): 2682-2686.
3. Baskin CC, Baskin JM (1998) Seeds: ecology, biogeography and evolution of dormancy and germination. Academic Press, San Diego.
4. Beaton LL, van Zandt PA, Esselman EJ, Knight TM (2011) Comparison of the herbivore defense and competitive ability of ancestral and modern genotypes of an invasive plant, Lespedeza cuneata. Oikos 120(9): 1413-1419.
5. Beerling DJ, Perrins JM (1993) Impatiens-glandulifera royle (Impatiens-roylei walp). J Ecol 81(2): 367-382.
6. Blair AC, Wolfe LM (2004) The evolution of an invasive plant: an experimental study with Silene latifolia. Ecology 85(11): 3035-3042.
7. Blossey B, Nötzold R (1995) Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants: a hypothesis. J Ecol 83(5): 887-889.
8. Blumenthal DM, Hufbauer RA (2007) Increased plant size in exotic populations: a common-garden test with 14 invasive species. Ecology 88(11): 2758-2765.
9. Bossdorf O, Prati D, Auge H, Schmid B (2004) Reduced competitive ability in an invasive plant. Ecol Lett 7(4): 346-353.
10. Bossdorf O, Auge H, Lafuma L, Rogers WE, Siemann E, Prati D (2005) Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populations. Oecologia 144(1): 1-11.
11. Cahill JF, Kembel SW, Gustafson DJ (2005) Differential genetic influences on competitive effect and response in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Ecol 93(5): 958-967.
12. Callaway RM, Aschehoug ET (2000) Invasive plants versus their new and old neighbors: a mechanism for exotic invasion. Science 290(5491): 521-523.
13. Dlugosch KM, Parker IM (2008) Founding events in species invasions: genetic variation, adaptive evolution, and the role of multiple introductions. Mol Ecol 17(1): 431-449.
14. Doorduin LJ, Vrieling K (2011) A review of the phytochemical support for the shifting defence hypothesis. Phytochem Rev 10(1): 99-106.
15. Dostal P (2011) Plant competitive interactions and invasiveness: searching for the effects of phylogenetic relatedness and origin on competition intensity. Am Nat 177(5): 655-667.
16. Franks SJ, Pratt PD, Dray FA, Simms EL (2008) Selection on herbivory resistance and growth rate in an invasive plant. Am Nat 171(5): 678-691.
17. Godoy O, Valladares F, Castro-Diez P (2011) Multispecies comparison reveals that invasive and native plants differ in their traits but not in their plasticity. Funct Ecol 25(6): 1248-1259.
18. Goldberg DE, Landa K (1991) Competitive effect and response: hierarchies and correlated traits in the early stages of competition. J Ecol 79(4): 1013-1030.
19. He WM, Feng YL, Ridenour WM, Thelen GC, Pollock JL, Diaconu A, Callaway RM (2009) Novel weapons and invasion: biogeographic differences in the competitive effects of Centaurea maculosa and its root exudate (±)-catechin. Oecologia 159(4): 803-815.
20. He WM, Thelen GC, Ridenour WM, Callaway RM (2010) Is there a risk to living large? Large size correlates with reduced growth when stressed for knapweed populations. Biol Invasions 12(10): 3591-3598.
21. Hejda M, Pyšek P (2006) What is the impact of Impatiens glandulifera on species diversity of invaded riparian vegetation? Biol Conserv 132(2): 143-152.
22. Inderjit, Callaway RM (2003) Experimental designs for the study of allelopathy. Plant Soil 256(1): 1-11.
23. Inderjit EvansH, Crocoll C, Bajpai D, Kaur R, Feng YL, Silva C, Carreon JT, Valiente-Banuet A, Gershenzon J, Callaway RM (2011) Volatile chemicals from leaf litter are associated with invasiveness of a neotropical weed in Asia. Ecology 92(2): 316-324.
24. Kollmann J, Bañuelos MJ (2004) Latitudinal trends in growth and phenology of the invasive alien plant Impatiens glandulifera (Balsaminaceae). Divers Distrib 10(5-6): 377-385.
25. Lankau RA, Kliebenstein DJ (2009) Competition, herbivory and genetics interact to determine the accumulation and fitness consequences of a defence metabolite. J Ecol 97(1): 78-88.
26. Lau JA, Puliafico KP, Kopshever JA, Steltzer H, Jarvis EP, Schwarzlander M, Strauss SY, Hufbauer RA (2008) Inference of allelopathy is complicated by effects of activated carbon on plant growth. New Phytol 178(2): 412-423.
27. Maron JL, Vila M, Arnason J (2004) Loss of enemy resistance among introduced populations of St. John's Wort (Hypericum perforatum). Ecology 85: 3243-3253.
28. Moloney KA, Holzapfel C, Tielbörger K, Jeltsch F, Schurr FM (2009) Rethinking the common garden in invasion research. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 11(4): 311-320.
29. Müller-Schärer H, Schaffner U, Steinger T (2004) Evolution in invasive plants: implications for biological control. Trends Ecol Evol 19(8): 417-422.
30. Prati D, Bossdorf O (2004) Allelopathic inhibition of germination by Alliaria petiolata (Brassicaceae). Am J Bot 91(2): 285-288.
31. Pyšek P, Prach K (1995) Invasion dynamics of Impatiens glandulifera - a century of spreading reconstructed. Biol Conserv 74(1): 41-48.
32. Richards CL, Bossdorf O, Muth NZ, Gurevitch J, Pigliucci M (2006) Jack of all trades, master of some? On the role of phenotypic plasticity in plant invasions. Ecol Lett 9(8): 981-993.
33. Ridenour WM, Vivanco JM, Feng YL, Horiuchi J, Callaway RM (2008) No evidence for trade-offs: Centaurea plants from America are better competitors and defenders. Ecol Monogr 78(3): 369-386.
34. Sakai AK, Allendorf FW, Holt JS, Lodge DM, Molofsky J, Kimberly A, Baughman S, Cabin RJ, Cohen JE, Ellstrand NC, McCauley DE, O'Neil P, Parker IM, Thompson JN, Weller SG (2001) The population biology of invasive specie. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 32: 305-332.
35. Scharfy D, Funk A, Venterink HO, Gusewell S (2011) Invasive forbs differ functionally from native graminoids, but are similar to native forbs. New Phytol 189(3): 818-828.
36. Schlaepfer DR, Glattli M, Fischer M, van Kleunen M (2010) A multi-species experiment in their native range indicates pre-adaptation of invasive alien plant species. New Phytol 185(4): 1087-1099.
37. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3rd edn. W. H. Freeman, New York.
38. Šrůtek M (1993) Distribution of the stands with Urtica dioica L. along the Lužnice River floodplain on the border between Austria and Czechoslovakia and land management. Vegetatio 106(1): 73-87.
39. Suding KN, LeJeune KD, Seastedt TR (2004) Competitive impacts and responses of an invasive weed: dependencies on nitrogen and phosphorus availability. Oecologia 141(3): 526-535.
40. Taylor K (2009) Biological Flora of the British Isles: Urtica dioica L. J Ecol 97(6): 1436-1458.
41. Thebaud C, Simberloff D (2001) Are plants really larger in their introduced ranges? Am Nat 157(2): 231-236.
42. Tickner DP, Angold PG, Gurnell AM, Mountford JO, Sparks T (2001) Hydrology as an influence on invasion: experimental investigations into competition between the alien Impatiens glandulifera and the native Urtica dioica in the UK. Plant invasions: species ecology and ecosystem management. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden.
43. van Kleunen M, Weber E, Fischer M (2010) A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive plant species. Ecol Lett 13(2): 235-245.
44. Vilà M, Weiner J (2004) Are invasive plant species better competitors than native plant species? evidence from pair-wise experiments. Oikos 105(2): 229-238.
45. Vilà M, Gomez A, Maron JL (2003) Are alien plants more competitive than their native conspecifics? A test using Hypericum perforatum L. Oecologia 137(2): 211-215.