Planetary dynamos and helicities

Geophysical Monograph Series

Volumn 111, Issue , 1999, Pages 47-54

  Radler K H ^a  

^a ASTROPHYSIKALISCHES INSTITUT POTSDAM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84891136207     PISSN: 00658448     EISSN: 23288779     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1029/GM111p0047     Document Type: Chapter

References (25)

1. F. H. Busse, E. Grote, and A. Tilgner. On convection driven dynamos in rotating spherical shells. Studia geoph. et geod., 42:211-223, 1998.
2. M. L. Dudley and R. W. James. Time-dependent kinematic dynamos with stationary flows. Proc. R. Soc. London A, 425:407-429, 1989.
3. G. A. Glatzmaier and P. H. Roberts. An anelastic evo-lutionary geodynamo simulation driven by compositional and thermal convection. Physica D, 97:81-94, 1996.
4. D. Gubbins. Numerical solutions of the kinematic dynamo problem. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London Ay 274:493-521, 1973.
5. R. Holme. Three-dimensional kimematic dynamos with equatorial symmetry: Application to the magnetic fields of Uranus and Neptune. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter.,102: 105-122, 1997.
6. R. K. Keinigs. A new interpretation of the alpha effect. Phys. Fluids, 26:2558-2560, 1983.
7. R. K. Keinigs and A. Gerwin. The alpha effect: The connec-tion between cyclonic events and current helicity. IEEE Transact. Plasma Sci., PS-14:858-861, 1986.
8. F. Krause and K.-H. Radler. Mean-Field Magnetohydro-dynamics and Dynamo Theory. Akademie-Verlag Berlin and Pergamon Press Oxford, 1980.
9. S. Kumar and P.H. Roberts. A three-dimensional kinematic dynamo. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A., 344:235-258, 1975.
10. J. J. Love and D. Gubbins. Optimized kinematic dynamos. Geophys. J. Int., 124:787-800,1996.
11. W. H. Matthaeus, M. L. Goldstein, and S. R. Lantz. The alpha dynamo parameter and the measurability of helicities in magnetohydrodynamic turbulence. Phys. Fluids, 29:1504-1508, 1986.
12. H. K. Moffatt. Magnetic Field Generation in Electrically Conducting Fluids. Cambridge University Press, 1978.
13. D. Moss and A. Brandenburg. The generation of nonax-isymmetric magnetic field in the giant planets. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dynamics, 80:229-240,1995.
14. N. F. Ness. Intrinsic magnetic fields of the planets: Mercury to Neptune. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., A 349:249-260, 1994.
15. C. L. Pekeris, Y. Accad, and B. Shkoller. Kinematic dynamos and the Earth’s magnetic field. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London A, 275:425-442,1973.
16. K.-H. Radler. Mean-field approach to spherical dynamo models. Astron. Nachr., 301:101-129, 1980.
17. K.-H. Radler. Investigations of spherical kinematic mean-field dynamo models. Astron. Nachr” 307:89-113,1986.
18. K.-H. Radler. Can the highly axisymmetric magnetic field of saturn be maintained by a dynamo? Adv. Space Research, 12:281-284, 1992.
19. K.-H. Radler and N. F. Ness. The symmetry properties of planetary magnetic fields. J. Geophys. Research, 95:2311-2318,1990.
20. K.-H. Radler and N. Seehafer. Relations between helicities in mean-field dynamo models. In H. K. Moffatt and A. Tsinober, editors, Topological Fluid Mechanics pages 157-163. Cambridge University Press, 1990.
21. M. Rheinhaxdt. Untersuchungen kinematischer und dy-namisch konsistenter Dynamomodelle in spharischer Ge-ometrie. PhD thesis, Universitat Potsdam, 1997.
22. G. Rudiger and D. Elstner. Non-axisymmetry vs. axisym-metry in dynamo-excited stellar magnetic fields. Astron. Astrophys., 281:46-50,1994.
23. G.R. Sarson. Kinematic Dynamo Calculations for Geomagnetism. PhD thesis, The University of Leeds, 1994.
24. N. Seehafer. Current helicity and the turbulent electromotive force. Europhys. Lett., 27:353-357, 1994.
25. N. Seehafer. Nature of the alpha-effect in magnetohydrody-namics. Phys. Rev. E, 53:1283-1286, 1996.