EGovernment - A driving force for public sector innovation?

2013 3rd International Conference on Innovative Computing Technology, INTECH 2013

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 149-154

  Lohmeier, Andreas ^a  

^a TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

barriers to innovation; eGovernment; process innovation; public sector innovation; workforce skills

Indexed keywords

BARRIERS TO INNOVATIONS; E-GOVERNMENT; PROCESS INNOVATION; PUBLIC SECTOR; WORKFORCE SKILLS;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

INNOVATION;

EID: 84891070605     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/INTECH.2013.6653688     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Hackney, R., Desouza, K. C. & Chau, P. 2008. eGovernment Strategies: ICT innovation in international public sector contexts The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17, iss: 2, 73-74.
2. Potnis, D. D., 2010. Measuring e-Governance as an innovation in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 27, iss: 1, 41-48.
3. Blind, K., 2011. "The Internet as Enabler for New Forms of Innovation: New Challenges for Research", Draft Paper prepared for the 1st Berlin Symposium on Internet and Society. [online], Available: http://berlinsymposium. org/sites/berlinsymposium. org/ files/innoindex. pdf [12. 04. 2013].
4. Xu, Y., 2010. E-Government: Innovation in Public Sector. 2nd International Conference. Networking and Digital Society. 1, iss: 1, 242-245.
5. Margetts, H., Dunleavy, P., Bastow, S. & Tinkler, J., 2003. "Leaders and Followers: E-government, Policy Innovation and Policy Transfer in the European Union", Paper to the EUSA Conference, Nashville, Tennessee. [online], Available: http://www. governmentontheweb. org/sites/ governmentontheweb. org/files/Leaders-Followers. pdf 25. 04. 2013
6. Detert, J., R., Schroeder, R. G. & Mauriel, J. J., 2000. A framework for linking culture and improvement initiatives in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 25, iss: 4, 850-863.
7. Bradley, L. & Parker, R., 2006. Do Australian public sector employees have the type of culture they want in the era of new public management? Australian Journal of Public Administration, 65, iss: 1, 89-99.
8. Pillay, S., 2008. A cultural ecology of New Public Management. International review of administrative sciences, 74, iss: 3, 373-394.
9. Goldkuhl, G., 2009. Innovation in a regulated Environment? Legal Barriers for e-Government Development. International Journal of Public Information Systems, 2009, iss: 2, 77-95.
10. Arfeen, M. I. & Khan, N. 2009. Public Sector Innovation: Case Study of e-government Projects in Pakistan, The Pakistan Development Review, 48, iss: 4, 439-457.
11. Mulgan, G. & Albury, D., 2003. Innovation in the Public Sector. Available: http://webarchive. nationalarchives. gov. uk/+/http://www. cabinetoffice. gov. uk/upload/assets/www. cabinetoffice. gov. uk/strategy/ pubinov2. pdf [28. 04. 2012].
12. Wargin, J. & Dobiey, D., 2001. E-business and change-managing the change in the digital economy. Journal of Change Management, 2, iss: 1, 72-82.
13. European Commission, 2011. "Innobarometer 2010: Analytical Report on Innovation in Public Administration", Brussels: DG Enterprise. Available: http://ec. europa. eu/public-opinion/flash/ fl-305-en. pdf [31. 02. 2013].
14. Cronbach, L. J., 1951. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of a test. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
15. Schwartz, S., 2012. Reliability. European Social Survey Education Net. Avialable: http://essedunet. nsd. uib. no/cms/topics/1/4/3. html 25. 04. 2013
16. Nunnally, J. C., 1978. Psychometric theory. 2nd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
17. DeVellis, R., 2003. Scale Development: Theory and Applications. 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Hardy, M. A., 1993. Regression with dummy variables. Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G., 1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. London: Sage.
20. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P.,1983. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd edition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. McClelland, G. H., & Judd, C. M., 1993. Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 376-390.
22. Evans, M. G., 1985. A Monte Carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated multiple regression analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36, 305-323.
23. Champoux, J. E., & Peters, W. S., 1987. Form, effect size, and power in moderated regression analysis. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 60, 243-255.
24. Bekkers, V. & Homburg, V. M. F., 2005. The information ecology of egovernment: Background & concepts. In: The information ecology of egovernment: E-government as institutional and technological innovation in the public sector, ed. Bekkers, V. J. J. M. and Homburg, V. M. F., 1-20. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
25. Archmann, S. & Iglesias, C. J., 2010. "eGovernment: A Driving Force for Innovation and Efficiency in Public Administration", EIPA Scope, 29-36. Available: http://www. eipa. eu/files/ repository/eipascope/ 20100519110452-Eipascope-2010-1eGovernment. pdf [04. 04. 2013].
26. Andersen, K. V., 2004. E-government and Public Sector Process Rebuilding-Dilettantes, Wheel Barrows, and Diamonds. 1st edition. Springer US.
27. Maria, P. A., Lavinia, S. J., Crisan, D. A. & Coculescu, C., 2011. EGovernment: A driving factor for stimulating innovation performance in Romania, Annals of Faculty of Economics, 1, iss: 1, 125-130.