Tracking transportation and industrial production across a nation

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2269, 2012, Pages 99-109

  Du, Xiaochuan ^a   Kockelman, Kara M ^b  

^a SOUTHEAST UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMERCE; COST REDUCTION;

EXPORT DEMAND; FREIGHT ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK; INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION; INPUT-OUTPUT; INPUT-OUTPUT MODELING; MANUFACTURING SECTOR; NESTED LOGIT MODEL; NETWORK DEMANDS; PRIMARY DATA SOURCE; TRADE PATTERNS;

TRAVEL TIME;

EID: 84891043659     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2269-12     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Echenique, M. H. The Use of Integrated Land Use Transportation Planning Models: The Cases of Sao Paolo, Brazil and Bilbao, Spain. In The Practice of Transportation Planning (M. Florian, ed.), Elsevier, The Hague, Netherlands, 1985.
2. Hunt, J. D., and M. H. Echenique. Experiences in the Application of the MEPLAN Framework for Land Use and Transportation Interaction Modeling. Proc., 4th National Conference on the Application of Transportation Planning Methods, Daytona Beach, Fla., 1993, pp. 723-754.
3. Hunt, J. D., and D. C. Simmonds. Theory and Application of an Integrated Land-Use and Transport Modeling Framework. Environment and Planning, Vol. 20B, No. 2, 1993, pp. 221-244.
4. Abraham, J. E., and J. D. Hunt. Firm Location in the MEPLAN Model of Sacramento. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1685, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D. C., 1999, pp. 187-198.
5. De la Barra, T. Integrated Land Use and Transport Modeling: Decision Chains and Hierarchies. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1995.
6. Hunt, J. D., and J. E. Abraham. Design and Application of the PECAS Land Use Modeling System. Presented at 8th Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management Conference, Sendai, Japan, 2003. http://www.ucalgary.ca/~jabraham/ Papers/pecas/8094.pdf. Accessed Jan. 20, 2011.
7. Kockelman, K. M., L. Jin, Y. Zhao, and N. Ruiz-Juri. Tracking Land Use, Transport, and Industrial Production Using Random-Utility Based Multiregional Input-Output Models: Applications for Texas Trade. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2005, pp. 275-286.
8. Zhao, Y., and K. M. Kockelman. The Random-Utility-Based Multiregional Input-Output Model: Solution Existence and Uniqueness. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 38, No. 9, 2004, pp. 789-807.
9. Kim, T. J., H. Ham, and D. E. Boyce. Economic Impacts of Transportation Network Changes: Implementation of a Combined Transportation Network and Input-Output Model. Papers in Regional Science, Vol. 81, 2003, pp. 223-246.
10. McDougall, R. A., A. Elbehri, and T. P. Truong. Global Trade Assistance and Protection: The GTAP 4 Database. Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University. http://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/databases/v4/default.asp
11. Canning, P., and Z. Wang. A Flexible Mathematical Programming Model to Estimate Interregional Input-Output Accounts. Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 45, No. 3, 2005, pp. 539-563.
12. Rey, S. J., and B. Dev. Integrating Econometric and Input-Output Models in a Multiregional Context. Growth and Change, Vol. 28, 1997, pp. 222-243.
13. Ham, H. J., T. J. Kim, and D. E. Boyce. Implementation and Estimation of a Combined Model of Interregional, Multimodal Commodity Shipments and Transportation Network Flows. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2005, pp. 65-79.
14. Ruiz Juri, N., and K. M. Kockelman. Extending the Random-Utility-Based Multiregional Input-Output Model: Incorporating Land-Use Constrains, Domestic Demand and Network Congestion in a Model of Texas Trade. Presented at 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D. C., 2004.
15. Ben-Akiva, M., and S. R. Lerman. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1985.
16. MIG, Inc. The Controlled Vocabulary of IMPLAN-Specific Terms. http://www.implan.com/v4/index.php?option=com-glossary&id=198
17. FHWA, U. S. Department of Transportation. Freight Analysis Framework. http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/freight/freight-analysis/faf/index.htm
18. Southworth, F., D. Davidson, H. Hwang, B. E. Peterson, and S. Chin. The Freight Analysis Framework, Version 3: Overview of the FAF3 National Freight Flow Tables. http://faf.ornl.gov/fafweb/Data/FAF3ODCMOverview.pdf
19. MIG, Inc. 440 IMPLAN Sector Scheme. http://implan.com/V4/index.php? option=com-docman&task=doc-dow
20. Bureau of Transportation Statistics, U. S. Department of Transportation. 2007 Commodity Flow Survey Standard Classification of Transported Goods.
21. Bureau of the Census. 2007 North American Industry Classification System. http://www.census.gov/cgi-bin/sssd/naics/naicsrch?chart=2007
22. MIG, Inc. Calculate the IMPLAN RPCs. http://implan.com/V4/index.php? option=com-docman&task=doc-download&gid=125&Itemid=7
23. Bureau of Transportation Statistics, U. S. Department of Transportation. 2007 Commodity Flow Survey: United States. 2010. http://www.bts.gov/ publications/commodity-flow-survey/final-tables-december-2009/pdf/entire.pdff
24. American Transportation Research Institute. An Analysis of the Operational Cost of Trucking. http://www.atri-online.org/research/results/ economicanalysis/Operational-Costs-OnePager.pdf
25. Railroad Performance Measures. http://www.railroadpm.org/Graphs/ Terminal%20Dwell%20Graph.aspx
26. AASHTO. Freight-Rail Bottom Line Report. http://rail.transportation.org/ Documents/FreightRailReport.pdf
27. Huang, T., and K. M. Kockelman. The Introduction of Dynamic Features in a Random-Utility-Based Multiregional Input-Output Model of Trade, Production, and Location Choice. Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Vol. 47, No. 1, 2008.