Implicit Arguments

The Blackwell Companion to Syntax

Volumn 2, Issue , 2007, Pages 558-588

  Bhatt, Rajesh ^a   Pancheva, Roumyana ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Arguments; Generalization; Implicit arguments; Obligation; Optionality

Indexed keywords

EID: 84891026847     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470996591.ch34     Document Type: Chapter

References (60)

1. Ackema, Peter and Maaike Schoorlemmer (1995). Middles and Non-Movement. Linguistic Inquiry 26: 173-197.
2. Alexiadou, Artemis and Elena Anagnostopoulou (1998). Parametrizing AGR: Word Order, V-Movement and EPP-Checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16: 491-539.
3. Bach, Emmon (1979). Control in Montague Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 10: 515-531.
4. Baker, Mark, Kyle Johnson, and Ian Roberts (1989). Passive Arguments Raised. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 219-251.
5. Bhatt, Rajesh (1997). Obligation and Possession. In: Proceedings of the MIT Round Table on Argument Structure. Heidi Harley (ed.). Cambridge: MIT.
6. Bhatt, Rajesh (1999). Covert Modality in Non-Finite Contexts. PhD dissertation, Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania.
7. Bhatt, Rajesh and Roumyana Izvorski (1998). Genericity, Implicit Arguments and Control. In: Proceedings of the Student Conference in Linguistics 7.
8. Borer, Hagit (1998). Deriving Passive Without Theta Roles. In: Morphology and its Relation to Phonology and Syntax. Stephen LaPointe, Diane Brentari, and Patrick Farrell (eds.), 60-110. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
9. Brennan, Virginia (1993). Root and Epistemic Modal Auxiliary Verbs. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts.
10. Bresnan, Joan (1982a). Complementation and Control. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 343-434.
11. Chierchia, Gennaro (1984b). Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of Infinitives and Gerunds. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts.
12. Chomsky, Noam (1982). Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge: MIT Press.
13. Chomsky, Noam (1986b). Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use. New York: Praeger.
14. Cinque, Guglielmo (1988). On Si-Constructions and the Theory of Arb. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 521-581.
15. Condoravdi, Cleo (1989). The Middle: Where Semantics and Morphology Meet. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 11: 16-30.
16. Condoravdi, Cleo and Jean Mark Gawron (1996). The Context-Dependency of Implicit Arguments. In: Quantifiers, Deduction, and Context. Makoto Kanazawa, Christopher J. Piňón, and Henriette de Swart (eds.), 1-32. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
17. Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen (1994a). On Impersonal Se/Si in Romanian, French and Italian. In: Paths Towards Universal Grammar: Studies in Honor of Richard S. Kayne. Guglielmo Cinque, Jan Koster, Jean-Yves Pollock, Luigi Rizzi, and Raffaella Zanuttini (eds.), 137-153. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
18. Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen (1998). Impersonal Se Constructions in Romance and the Passiv-ization of Unergatives. Linguistic Inquiry 29/3: 399-438.
19. Engelberg, Stefan (2002). Intransitive Accomplishments and the Lexicon: The Role of Implicit Arguments, Definiteness, and Reflexivity in Aspectual Composition. Journal of Semantics 19: 369-416.
20. Epstein, Samuel (1984). Quantifier-Pro and the LF Representation of PROarb. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 499-505.
21. Fagan, Sarah M. B. (1992). The Syntax and Semantics of Middle Constructions: A Study with Special Reference to German. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Fiengo, Robert (1980). Surface Structure. Boston: Harvard University Press.
23. Härtl, Holden (2003). The Conceptual Inactiveness of Implicit Arguments: Evidence from Particle Verbs and Object Categorization. Journal of Semantics 20/1: 1-33.
24. Hoekstra, Teun and Ian Roberts (1993b). Middle Constructions in Dutch and English. In: Knowledge and Language II: Lexical and Conceptual Structure. Eric Reuland and Werner Abraham (eds.), 183-220. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
25. Hole, Daniel (2005). Extra Argumen tality: A Binding Account of 'Possessor Raising' in English, German, and Mandarin. In: Possessives and Beyond: Semantics and Syntax. Ji-Yung Kim, Yuri A. Lander, and Barbara H. Partee (eds.). Amherst Graduate Linguistics Student Association.
26. Jackendoff, Ray (1972). Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge: MIT Press.
27. Jackendoff, Ray (1987). The Status of Thematic Relations in Linguistic Theory. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 369-412.
28. Kawasaki, Noriko (1993). Control and Arbitrary Interpretation in English. PhD dissertation, Amherst, University of Massachusetts.
29. Keyser, Samuel J. and Thomas Roeper (1984). On the Middle and Ergative Constructions in English. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 381-416.
30. Klein, Ewan and Ivan Sag (1985). Type Driven Translation. Linguistics and Philosophy 8: 163-202.
31. Koenig, Jean-Pierre and Gail Mauner (1999). A-Definites and the Discourse Status of Implicit Arguments. Journal of Semantics 16: 207-236.
32. Kratzer, Angelika (1991). Modality. In: Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. Arnim von Stechow and Dieter Wunderlich (eds.). Berlin: de Gruyter.
33. Kratzer, Angelika (2004). Covert Quantifier Restrictions in Natural Languages. Handout of talk presented in Gargnano, Italy.
34. Landau, Idan (2001). Control and Extraposition: The Case of Super-Equi. Natural. Language and Linguistic Theory 19/1: 109-152.
35. Larson, Richard (1988a). Implicit Arguments in Situation Semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy 11: 169-201.
36. Lasersohn, Peter (1997). Lexical Distributivity and Implicit Arguments. In: Proceedings of SALT III. Utpal Lahiri and Adam Zachary Wyner (eds.), 145-161. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
37. Manzini, Maria Rita (1983a). On Control and Control Theory. Linguistic Inquiry 14: 421-446.
38. Manzini, Maria Rita (1986a). On Control and Binding Theory. In: Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Society 16. Stephen Berman, Jae-Woong Choe, and Joyce McDonough (eds.), 322-337. Amherst: Graduate Linguistics Student Association.
39. Manzini, Maria Rita (1992b). The Projection Principle(s): A Reexamination. In: Thematic Structure: Its Role in Grammar. Iggy Roca (ed.), 271-291. Berlin: Mouton.
40. Marantz, Alec (1981). On the Nature of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge: MIT Press.
41. Mauner, Gail and Jean-Pierre Koenig (2000). Linguistic vs. Conceptual Sources of Implicit Agents in Sentence Comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 34: 110-134.
42. Mitchell, Jonathan E. (1986). The Formal Semantics of Point of View. PhD dissertation, Amherst, University of Massachusetts.
43. Partee, Barbara H. (1989). Binding Implicit Variables in Quantified Contexts. In: Papers from the Twenty-fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Caroline Wiltshire, Randolph Graczyk, and Bradley Music (eds.), 342-356. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
44. Partee, Barbara H. and Emmon Bach (1980). Anaphora and Semantic Structure. In: Papers from the Sixteenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Jody Kreiman and Almerindo E. Ojeda (eds.). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
45. Perlmutter, David (1971). Deep and Surface Structure Constraints in Syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
46. Rapoport, Tova R. (1999a). The English Middle and Agentivity. Linguistic Inquiry 30/1: 147-155.
47. Rizzi, Luigi (1986a). Null Objects in Italian and the Theory of Pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 501-557.
48. Roeper, Thomas (1987a). Implicit Arguments and the Head-Complement Relation. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 267-310.
49. Ross, John Robert (1969a). Auxiliaries as Main Verbs. In: Studies in Philosophical Linguistics 1. William Todd (ed.), 77-102. Evanston: Great Expectations Press.
50. Ross, John Robert (1969c). On the Cyclic Nature of English Pronominalization. In: Modern Studies in English. David Reibel and Sanford Schane (eds.), 187-200. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
51. Safir, Kenneth (1991). Evaluative Predicates and the Representation of Implicit Arguments. In: Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar. Robert Freidin (ed.), 99-131. Cambridge: MIT Press.
52. Stroik, Thomas (1992a). Middles and Movement. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 127-137.
53. Suňer, Margarita (1983). Proarb. Linguistic Inquiry 14: 188-191.
54. Vinet, Marie-Thérěse (1988). Implicit Arguments and Control in Middles and Passives. In: Advances in Romance Linguistics. David Birdsong and Jean-Pierre Montreuil (eds.). Dordrecht: Foris.
55. Visser, Frederic Theodor (1969). An Historical Syntax of the English Language. Vol. 2. Leiden: Brill.
56. Williams, Edwin (1974). Rule Ordering in Syntax. PhD dissertation, Cambridge, MIT.
57. Williams, Edwin (1985). PRO and the Subject of NP. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 297-315.
58. Williams, Edwin (1987b). Implicit Arguments, the Binding Theory and Control. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5: 151-180.
59. Wurmbrand, Susi (1999a). Modal Verbs Must be Raising Verbs. In: Proceedings of the Eighteenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Sonya Bird, Andrew Carnie, Jason D. Haugen, and Peter Norquest (eds.), 599-612. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.
60. Zribi-Hertz, Anne (1993). On Stroik's Analysis of English Middle Constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 583-589.