Integrating ecosystem services into environmental impact assessment: An analytic-deliberative approach

Environmental Impact Assessment Review

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 54-64

  Karjalainen, Timo P ^a   Marttunen, Mika ^b   Sarkki, Simo ^a   Rytkönen, Anne Mari ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

^b FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ECOLOGY; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTS; RESTORATION;

ANALYTIC-DELIBERATIVE APPROACH; ASSESSMENT PROCESS; DESKTOP APPLICATIONS; ECOSYSTEM PROCESS; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTS (EIA); INTEGRATED APPROACH; MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS; RIVER RESTORATION; STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT; VALUE-FOCUSED THINKING;

ECOSYSTEMS;

ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; STAKEHOLDER; INTEGRATED APPROACH; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; RIVER MANAGEMENT; TRADE-OFF; VALUATION; ANALYTICAL METHOD; ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION; SERVICE PROVISION;

FINLAND;

EID: 84890925039     PISSN: 01959255     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2012.12.001     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2005.
2. Arvai JL, Gregory R, McDaniels TL. Testing a structured decision approach: value-focused thinking for deliberative risk communication. Risk Anal 2001;21(6):1065-76.
3. Bagli S, Geneletti D, Orsi F. Routeing of power lines through least-cost path analysis and multicriteria evaluation to minimise environmental impacts. Environ Impact Assess Rev 2011;31:234-9.
4. Bauer G. Reproductive strategy of the freshwater pearlmussel Margaritifera margatitifera. J Anim Ecol 1987;56:691-704.
5. Belton V, Stewart TJ. Multiple criteria decision analysis - an integrated approach. Boston, Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002.
6. Bottom DL, Jones KK, Simenstad CA, Smith CL. Reconnecting social and ecological resilience in salmon ecosystems. Ecol Soc 2009;14(5). [[online] URL: http://www. ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art5/].
7. Carpenter S, Mooney H, Agard J, Capistrano D, DeFries R, Díaz S, et al. Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. PNAS 2009;106(5):1305-12.
8. Chan KMA, Satterfield T, Goldstein J. Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecol Econ 2012;74:8-18.
9. Chilvers J. Deliberating competence: theoretical and practitioner perspectives on effective participatory appraisal practice. Sci Technol Hum Values 2008;33:421-51.
10. Coleby AM, van der Horst D, Hubacek K, Goodier C, Burgess PJ, Graves A, et al. Environmental impact assessment, ecosystems services and the case of energy crops in England. J Environ Plan Manag 2012;55:369-85.
11. de Groot RS, Alkemade R, Braat L, Hein L, Willemen L. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol Complex 2010;7:260-72.
12. Dietz T, Stern PC. Public participation in environmental assessment and decision making. National Research Council (U.S.). Panel on Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making; National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change.Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2008.
13. Eisenführ F, Weber M, Langer T. Rational decision making. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2010.
14. Erkinaro J, Laine A, Mäki-Petäys A, Karjalainen TP, Laajala E, Hirvonen A, et al. Restoring migratory salmonid populations in regulated rivers in the northernmost Baltic Sea area, northern Finland - biological, technical and social challenges. J Appl Ichthyol 2011;27:45-52.
15. Fish RD. Environmental decision making and an ecosystems approach: some challenges from the perspective of social science. Prog Phys Geogr 2011;35:671-80.
16. Fisher B, Turner RK, Morling P. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecol Econ 2009;68:643-53.
17. Geneletti D. Impact assessment of proposed ski areas: a GIS approach integrating biological, physical and landscape indicators. Environ Impact Assess Rev 2008;28:116-30.
18. Geneletti D. Reasons and options for integrating ecosystem services in strategic environmental assessment of spatial planning. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manage 2011;7:143-9.
19. Gregory R, Keeney R. Creating policy alternatives using stakeholder values. Manage Sci 1994;40:1035-48.
20. Gregory R, Failing L, Harstone M, Long G, McDaniels T, Ohlson D. Structured decision making: a practical guide to environmental management choices. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.; 2012.
21. Haapasaari P, Karjalainen TP. Formalizing expert knowledge to compare alternative management plans: sociological perspective to the future management of Baltic salmon stocks. Mar Policy 2010;34:477-86.
22. Hajkowick S, Collins K. A review ofmultiple criteria analysis for water resources planning and management. Water Resour Manage 2007;21:1553-66.
23. Hostmann M, Borsuk M, Reichert P, Truffer B. Stakeholder values in decision support for river rehabilitation. Arch Hydrobiol Suppl 2005;155:491-505.
24. Huang IB, Keisler J, Linkov I. Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: ten years of applications and trends. Sci Total Environ 2011;409:3578-94.
25. Kangas A, Kangas J, Kurttila M. Decision support for forest management. Managing forest ecosystems, vol. 16. Springer; 2008.
26. Karjalainen TP, Järvikoski T. Negotiating river ecosystems: impact assessment and conflict mediation in the cases of hydro-power construction. Environ Impact Assess Rev 2010;30:319-27.
27. Karjalainen TP, Rytkönen A-M, Marttunen M, Mäki-Petäys A, Autti O. Monitavoitearviointi Iijoen vaelluskalakantojen palauttamisen tukena (The support of multicriteria assessment in restoring migratory fish stocks in the River Iijoki). Finnish Environment; 11/2011 [in Finnish].
28. Kauppila P, Karjalainen TP. A process model to assess the regional economic impacts of fishing tourism: a case study in northern Finland. Fish Res 2012;127-128:88-97.
29. Keefer DL, Kirkwood CW, Corner JL. Perspective on decision analysis applications, 1990-2001. Decis Anal 2004;1:4-34.
30. Keeney R. Value-focused thinking. A path to creative decisionmaking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1992.
31. Keeney R. Framing public policy decisions. Int J Technol Policy Manage 2005;4:95-115.
32. Keeney R, Gregory RS. Selecting attributes to measure the achievement of objectives. Oper Res 2005;53:1-11.
33. Keeney R, Raiffa H. Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs. Wiley; 1976 [569 pp.].
34. Kiker GA, Bridges TS, Varghese A, Seager TP, Linkov I. Application ofmulticriteria decision analysis in environmental decision making. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2005;1: 95-108.
35. Landsberg F, Ozment S, Stickler M, Henninger N, Treweek J, Venn O, et al. Ecosystem services review for impact assessment: introduction and guide to scoping.WRIWorking Paper. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute; 2011. [Available from http:// www.wri.org/publication/ecosystemservices-review-for-impact-assessment].
36. Liu S, Costanza R, Farber S, Troy A. Valuing ecosystem services: theory, practice, and the need for a transdisciplinary synthesis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2010;1185:54-78.
37. Marttunen M, Hämäläinen RP. Decision analysis interviews in environmental impact assessment. Eur J Oper Res 1995;87:551-63.
38. Marttunen M, Hämäläinen RP. Decision analysis interviews in supporting collaborative management of a large regulated water course. Environ Manage 2008;42:1026-42.
39. Milder JC, Scherr SJ, Bracer C. Trends and future potential of payment for ecosystem services to alleviate rural poverty in developing countries. Ecol Soc 2010;15:4.
40. Mustajoki J, Hämäläinen RP. Web-HIPRE: global decision support by value tree and AHP analysis. Infor 2000;38:208-20.
41. Mustajoki J, Saarikoski H, Marttunen M, Ahtikoski A, Hallikainen V, Helle T, et al. Use of decision analysis interviews to support the sustainable use of the forests in Finnish Upper Lapland. J Environ Manage 2011;92:1550-63.
42. Nahlik AM, Kentula ME, Fennessy MS, Landers Dh. Where is the consensus? A proposed foundation for moving ecosystem service concepts into practice. Ecol Econ 2012;77: 27-35.
43. Oikonomou V, Dimitrakopoulos PG, Troumbis AY. Incorporating ecosystem function concept in environmental planning and decision making by means of multicriteria evaluation: the case-study of Kalloni, Lesbos, Greece. Environ Manage 2011;47:77-92.
44. Proctor W, Dreshler M. Deliberative multicriteria evaluation. Environ Plan C 2006;24: 169-90.
45. Renn O. The challenge of integrating deliberation and expertise: participation and discourse in risk management. In: McDaniels T, Small MJ, editors. Risk analysis and society. An interdisciplinary characterization of the fieldCambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 2004. [2004].
46. Sigel K, Klauer B, Pahl-Wostl C. Conceptualizing uncertainty in environmental decision-making: the example of the EU Water Framework Directive. Ecol Econ 2010;69:502-10.
47. Turner RK, Morse-Jones S, Fisher B. Ecosystem valuation. A sequential decision support system and quality assessment issues. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2010;1185: 79-101.
48. UK National Ecosystem Assessment. The UK National Ecosystem Assessment: technical report. Cambridge: UNEP-WCMC; 2010.
49. Valovirta I. Conservation methods for populations of Margaritifera margatitifera (L) in Finland. J Conchol 1998;2:251-6.
50. Vatn A. An institutional analysis of methods for environmental appraisal. Ecol Econ 2009;68:2207-15.
51. Von Winterfeldt D, Edwards W. Decision analysis and behavioral research. Cambridge University Press; 1986 [604 pp.].
52. Wilson MA, Howarth RB. Discourse-based valuation of ecosystem services: establishing fair outcomes through group deliberation. Ecol Econ 2002;41:431-43.