Bike-and-ride: Build it and they will come

Journal of Public Transportation

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 83-105

  Cervero, Robert ^a   Caldwell, Benjamin ^a   Cuellar, Jesus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890921595     PISSN: 1077291X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5038/2375-0901.16.4.5     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit). 2002. BART Bicycle Access and Parking Plan. Oakland: San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit System, agency report.
2. BART. 2006. Access BART. Oakland: San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit System, agency report.
3. Beatley, Timothy. 2000. Green Urbanism: Learning from European Cities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
4. Bernick, Michael S., and Robert Cervero. 1997. Transit Villages for the 21st Century. New York: McGraw-Hill.
5. Buehler, Ralph, and John Pucher. 2012. Cycling to work in 90 large American cities: New evidence on the role of bike paths and lanes. Transportation 29: 409-432.
6. Calthorpe, Peter. 1993. The New American Metropolis: Ecology, Community, and the American Dream. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
7. Cervero, Robert. 1995. Rail Access Modes and Catchment Areas for the BART System. Berkeley: Institute of Urban and Regional Development, Monograph 50, University of California.
8. Cervero, Robert. 2001. Walk-and-ride: factors influencing pedestrian access to transit. Journal of Public Transportation 3(4): 1-23.
9. Cervero, Robert. 2003. Green connectors: Off-shore examples. Planning 69(5): 25-29.
10. Cervero, Robert, and John Landis. 1997. Twenty years of BART: Land use and development impacts. Transportation Research A 31(4): 309-333.
11. Cervero, Robert, G. B. Arrington, Janet Smith-Heimer, and Robert Dunphy. 2005. Transit Oriented Development in America: Experiences, Challenges, and Prospects. Washington, DC: Transit Cooperative Research Program, Report, 102.
12. Dill, Jennifer, and Kim Voros. 2007. Factors affecting bicycling demand: Initial survey findings from the Portland, Oregon region. Transportation Research Record 2031: 9-17.
13. Eisen Letunic. 2012. BART Bicycle Plan: Modeling Access to Transit. Oakland: San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit System.
14. Fehr and Peers. 2012. BART Bicycle Access Plan Update: BART Bicycle Access Direct Ridership Model Development. Oakland: Bay Area Rapid Transit System.
15. Krizek, Kevin J., Ahmed El-Geneidy, and Kristin Thompson. 2007. A detailed analysis of how an urban trail system affects cyclists' travel. Transportation 34: 611-624.
16. Martens, Karel. 2004. The Bicycle as a feedering mode: Experiences from three European countries. Transportation Research D 9: 281-294.
17. Martens, Karel. 2007. Promoting bike-and-ride: The Dutch experience. Transportation Research A 41: 326-338.
18. Parsons Brinckerhoff. 2010. Metrorail Bicycle & Pedestrian Access Improvements Study. Washington, DC: Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority.
19. Pucher, John, and Ralph Buehler. 2008. Making cycling irresistible: Lessons from The Netherlands, Denmark and Germany. Transport Reviews 28(4): 495-528.
20. Pucher, John, and Ralph Buehler. 2009. Integrating bicycling and public transport in North America. Journal of Public Transportation 12(3): 79-104.
21. Pucher, John, and Ralph Buehler. 2010. Walking and cycling for healthy cities. Built Environment 36(4): 391-414.
22. Pucher, John, Ralph Buehler, David R. Bassett, and Andrew L. Dannenberg. 2010. Walking and cycling to health: A comparative analysis of city, state, and international data. American Journal of Public Health 100(10): 1986-1992.
23. Pucher, John, Ralph Buehler, and Mark Seinen. 2011. Bicycling renaissance in North America? An update and re-appraisal of cycling trends and policies. Transportation Research A 45: 451-475.
24. Rietveld, Piet. 2000. The accessibility of railway stations: The role of the bicycle in The Netherlands. Transportation Research D 5: 71-75.
25. The Unity Council. 2012. Fruitvale Transit Village Project. Partnerships, Enhancements, and Public Involvement. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration, Office of Planning, Environment and Realty, U.S. Department of Transportation.
26. Webber, Melvin M. 1976. The BART experience: What have we learned? The Public Interest 45: 79-108.
27. Weissman, Dana. 2012. The City of Berkeley Bicycle Counts: Summary of Trends, 2000-2012. Berkeley: Master Degree Client Report, Department of City and Regional Planning, University of California.
28. Yin, Robert K. 1994. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.