Data-Driven Deselection: Multiple Point Data Using a Decision Support Tool in an Academic Library

Collection Management

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 17-31

  Snyder, Cynthia Ehret ^a  

^a ROLLINS COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

academic libraries; data driven deselection; deaccession; decision support tool; evaluative criteria; weeding

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890893329     PISSN: 01462679     EISSN: 15452549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01462679.2013.866607     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Demas, Samuel and Miller, Mary E. 2012. Rethinking Collection Management Plans: Shaping Collective Collections for the 21st Century. Collection Management, 37 (3/4): 168 - 87.
2. Dubicki, Eleonora. 2008. Weeding: Facing the Fears. Collection Building, 27 (4): 132 - 35.
3. Farber, Evan Ira. 1997. Books Not for College Libraries. Library Journal, 122 (13): 44 - 5.
4. Gillies, Scott and Stephenson, Carol. 2012. Three Libraries, Three Weeding Projects: Collaborative Weeding Projects Within a Shared Print Repository. Collection Management, 37 (3/4): 205 - 22.
5. Gilson, Tom and Strauch, Katina. 2012. ATG Interviews Rick Lugg and Ruth Fischer. Against the Grain, 24 (1): 34 - 6.
6. Larson, Jeanette. 2008. CREW: A Weeding Method for Modern Libraries, Austin, TX: Texas State Library and Archives Commission. https://www.tsl.state.tx.us/ld/pubs/crew/index.html
7. Lugg, Rick. 2012. Data-Driven Deselection for Monographs: A Rules-Based Approach to Weeding, Storage, and Shared Print Decisions. Insights, 25 (2): 198 - 204.
8. Lugg, Rick and Fischer, Ruth. 2008. Future Tense-the Disapproval Plan: Rules-Based Weeding and Storage. Against the Grain, 20 (6): 74 - 5.
9. Manley, Will. 1996. The Manley Arts: If I Called This Column 'Weeding,' You Wouldn't Read It. Booklist, 92 (13): 1108
10. Martin, Jim, Kamada, Hitoshi and Feeney, Mary. 2013. A Collection Plan for Managing Physical Collections at the University of Arizona Libraries. Collection Management, 38 (3): 226 - 42.
11. Metz, Paul and Gray, Caryl. 2005. Perspectives on. Public Relations and Library Weeding. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31 (3): 273 - 9.
12. O'Neill, Edward T. and Gammon, Julia A. 2009. " Building Collections Cooperatively: Analysis of Collection Use in the OhioLINK Library Consortium ". In Pushing the Edge: Explore, Engage, Extend: Proceedings of the Fourteenth National Conference of the Association of College and Research Libraries, 36-45, Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research Libraries.
13. Reed, Lawrence L. and Erickson, Rodney. 1993. Weeding: A Quantitative and Qualitative Approach. Library Acquisitions: Practice and Theory, 17 (2): 175 - 81.
14. Schleicher, Mary C. 2010. Assembling Selection Criteria and Writing a Collection Development Policy for a Variety of Older Medical Books. Journal of Hospital Librarianship, 10 (3): 251 - 64.
15. Slote, Stanley. 1975. Weeding Library Collections, Littleton, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
16. Slote, Stanley. 1997. Weeding Library Collections, 4th ed, Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
17. Smith, Shelley L. 2012. Weeding Considerations for an Academic Music Collection. Music Reference Services Quarterly, 15 (1): 22 - 33.
18. Soares, Richard D. and Power, Colleen. 2007. The Most Often Cited Chemistry Books in 1981: Twenty Years Later. Science & Technology Libraries, 27 (4): 43 - 60.
19. Soma, Amy K. and Sjoberg, Lisa M. 2011. More Than Just Low-Hanging Fruit: A Collaborative Approach to Weeding in Academic Libraries. Collection Management, 36 (10): 17 - 28.
20. Trueswell, Richard W. 1965. A Quantitative Measure of User Circulation Requirements and Its Possible Effect on Stack Thinning and Multiple Copy Determination. American Documentation, 16 (1): 20 - 6.
21. Way, Doug and Garrison, Julie. 2013. Developing and Implementing a Disapproval Plan: One University Library's Experience. College and Research Library News, 74 (6): 284 - 7.