Remote monitoring of patients with implanted devices: Data exchange and integration

European Journal of Preventive Cardiology

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 9-12

  Van Der Velde, Enno T ^a   Atsma, Douwe E ^a   Foeken, Hylke ^a   Witteman, Tom A ^a   Hoekstra, Wybo H G J ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

data exchange; ICD; IHE; implantable devices; pacemaker; Remote monitoring; standardization

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMMUNICATION PROTOCOL; DATA BASE; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR; INFORMATION PROCESSING; NOMENCLATURE; OUTPATIENT CARE; PATIENT MONITORING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REMOTE SENSING; AMBULATORY CARE; AMBULATORY MONITORING; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; CORONARY CARE UNIT; DEVICES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN; INTEGRATED HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; MEDICAL RECORD; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; TELECONSULTATION; TELEMETRY;

AMBULATORY CARE; CARDIOLOGY SERVICE, HOSPITAL; DEFIBRILLATORS, IMPLANTABLE; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE, INTEGRATED; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORD LINKAGE; MONITORING, AMBULATORY; PACEMAKER, ARTIFICIAL; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; REMOTE CONSULTATION; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SYSTEMS INTEGRATION; TELEMETRY;

EID: 84890893152     PISSN: 20474873     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/2047487313487483b     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Raatikainen MJ, Uusimaa P, van Ginneken MM, et al. Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: A safe, time-saving, and cost-effective means for follow-up. Europace. 2008 ; 10: 1145-1151
2. Wilkoff BL, Auricchio A, Brugada J, et al. HRS/EHRA Expert Consensus on the Monitoring of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs): Description of techniques, indications, personnel, frequency and ethical considerations: Developed in partnership with the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA); and in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), the Heart Failure Association of ESC (HFA), and the Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA). Endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society, the European Heart Rhythm Association (a registered branch of the ESC)
3. Al-Khatib SM, Piccini JP, Knight D, et al. Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators versus quarterly device interrogations in clinic: Results from a randomized pilot clinical trial. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010 ; 21: 545-550
4. Bikou O, Licka M, Kathoefer S, et al. Cost savings and safety of ICD remote control by telephone: A prospective, observational study. J Telemed Telecare. 2010 ; 16: 403-408
5. Ricci RP, Morichelli L, D'Onofrio A, et al. Effectiveness of remote monitoring of CIEDs in detection and treatment of clinical and device-related cardiovascular events in daily practice: the HomeGuide Registry. Europace. Epub ahead of print 29 January 2013. DOI: 10.1093/europace/eus440.
6. Guedon-Moreau L, Chevalier P, Marquie C, et al. Contributions of remote monitoring to the follow-up of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads under advisory. Eur Heart J. 2010 ; 31: 2246-2252
7. Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise. Welcome to Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise, http://www.ihe.net (2002, accessed 26 March 2013).
8. National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Standards for registration, transparency and quality, http://www.ncdr.nl (2008, accessed 26 March 2013).
9. European Society of Cardiology. EURObservational research programme, http://www.escardio.org/guidelines-surveys/eorp/Pages/welcome.aspx (1997, accessed 26 March 2013).