메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 801-805

On the correlation between effect size and sample size: A reply

Author keywords

effect sizes; eta; Ns; power; publication bias; r; simulation

Indexed keywords


EID: 84890874981     PISSN: 09593543     EISSN: 14617447     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0959354313500863     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (4)

References (9)
  • 1
    • 84890865577 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Sweeping recommendations regarding effect size and sample size can miss important nuances: A comment on “A comprehensive review of reporting practices in psychological journals
    • Bradley M. T. Brand A. (2013). Sweeping recommendations regarding effect size and sample size can miss important nuances: A comment on “A comprehensive review of reporting practices in psychological journals”. Theory & Psychology, 23, 797–800.
    • (2013) Theory & Psychology , vol.23 , pp. 797-800
    • Bradley, M.T.1    Brand, A.2
  • 2
    • 4243202706 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Diagnosing estimate distortion due to significance testing in literature on detection of deception
    • doi:, 10.2466/pms.98.3.827-839
    • Bradley M. T. Stoica G. (2004). Diagnosing estimate distortion due to significance testing in literature on detection of deception. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 98, 827–839. doi:10.2466/pms.98.3.827-839
    • (2004) Perceptual and Motor Skills , vol.98 , pp. 827-839
    • Bradley, M.T.1    Stoica, G.2
  • 3
    • 84878273170 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Influence of trial sample size on treatment effect estimates: Meta-epidemiological study
    • doi:, 10.1136/bmj.f2304
    • Dechartres A. Trinquart L. Boutron I. Ravaud P. (2013). Influence of trial sample size on treatment effect estimates: Meta-epidemiological study. British Medical Journal, 346, 2304–2309. doi:10.1136/bmj.f2304
    • (2013) British Medical Journal , vol.346 , pp. 2304-2309
    • Dechartres, A.1    Trinquart, L.2    Boutron, I.3    Ravaud, P.4
  • 4
    • 84869028702 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A vast graveyard of undead theories publication bias and psychological science's aversion to the null
    • doi:, 10.1177/1745691612459059
    • Ferguson C. J. Heene M. (2012). A vast graveyard of undead theories publication bias and psychological science's aversion to the null. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 555–561. doi:10.1177/1745691612459059
    • (2012) Perspectives on Psychological Science , vol.7 , Issue.6 , pp. 555-561
    • Ferguson, C.J.1    Heene, M.2
  • 5
    • 84873882647 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A comprehensive review of reporting practices in psychological journals: Are effect sizes really enough?
    • doi:, 10.1177/0959354312436870
    • Fritz A. Scherndl T. Kühberger A. (2013a). A comprehensive review of reporting practices in psychological journals: Are effect sizes really enough? Theory & Psychology, 23, 98–122. doi:10.1177/0959354312436870
    • (2013) Theory & Psychology , vol.23 , pp. 98-122
    • Fritz, A.1    Scherndl, T.2    Kühberger, A.3
  • 6
    • 84890880353 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Publication bias and the correlation between effect size and sample size in psychological research: Sources, consequences, and remedies
    • Manuscript submitted for publication
    • Fritz A. Scherndl T. Kühberger A. (2013b). Publication bias and the correlation between effect size and sample size in psychological research: Sources, consequences, and remedies. Manuscript submitted for publication.
    • (2013)
    • Fritz, A.1    Scherndl, T.2    Kühberger, A.3
  • 8
    • 0000324575 scopus 로고
    • Do studies of statistical power have an effect on the power of studies?
    • doi:, 10.1037/0033–2909.105.2.309
    • Sedlmeier P. Gigerenzer G. (1989). Do studies of statistical power have an effect on the power of studies? Psychological Bulletin, 105, 309–316. doi:10.1037/0033–2909.105.2.309
    • (1989) Psychological Bulletin , vol.105 , pp. 309-316
    • Sedlmeier, P.1    Gigerenzer, G.2
  • 9
    • 0035859525 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Systematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis
    • doi:, 10.1136/bmj.323.7304.101
    • Sterne J. A. C. Egger M. Smith G. D. (2001). Systematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis. British Medical Journal, 323, 101–105. doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7304.101
    • (2001) British Medical Journal , vol.323 , pp. 101-105
    • Sterne, J.A.C.1    Egger, M.2    Smith, G.D.3


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.