-
1
-
-
84890865577
-
Sweeping recommendations regarding effect size and sample size can miss important nuances: A comment on “A comprehensive review of reporting practices in psychological journals
-
Bradley M. T. Brand A. (2013). Sweeping recommendations regarding effect size and sample size can miss important nuances: A comment on “A comprehensive review of reporting practices in psychological journals”. Theory & Psychology, 23, 797–800.
-
(2013)
Theory & Psychology
, vol.23
, pp. 797-800
-
-
Bradley, M.T.1
Brand, A.2
-
2
-
-
4243202706
-
Diagnosing estimate distortion due to significance testing in literature on detection of deception
-
doi:, 10.2466/pms.98.3.827-839
-
Bradley M. T. Stoica G. (2004). Diagnosing estimate distortion due to significance testing in literature on detection of deception. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 98, 827–839. doi:10.2466/pms.98.3.827-839
-
(2004)
Perceptual and Motor Skills
, vol.98
, pp. 827-839
-
-
Bradley, M.T.1
Stoica, G.2
-
3
-
-
84878273170
-
Influence of trial sample size on treatment effect estimates: Meta-epidemiological study
-
doi:, 10.1136/bmj.f2304
-
Dechartres A. Trinquart L. Boutron I. Ravaud P. (2013). Influence of trial sample size on treatment effect estimates: Meta-epidemiological study. British Medical Journal, 346, 2304–2309. doi:10.1136/bmj.f2304
-
(2013)
British Medical Journal
, vol.346
, pp. 2304-2309
-
-
Dechartres, A.1
Trinquart, L.2
Boutron, I.3
Ravaud, P.4
-
4
-
-
84869028702
-
A vast graveyard of undead theories publication bias and psychological science's aversion to the null
-
doi:, 10.1177/1745691612459059
-
Ferguson C. J. Heene M. (2012). A vast graveyard of undead theories publication bias and psychological science's aversion to the null. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 555–561. doi:10.1177/1745691612459059
-
(2012)
Perspectives on Psychological Science
, vol.7
, Issue.6
, pp. 555-561
-
-
Ferguson, C.J.1
Heene, M.2
-
5
-
-
84873882647
-
A comprehensive review of reporting practices in psychological journals: Are effect sizes really enough?
-
doi:, 10.1177/0959354312436870
-
Fritz A. Scherndl T. Kühberger A. (2013a). A comprehensive review of reporting practices in psychological journals: Are effect sizes really enough? Theory & Psychology, 23, 98–122. doi:10.1177/0959354312436870
-
(2013)
Theory & Psychology
, vol.23
, pp. 98-122
-
-
Fritz, A.1
Scherndl, T.2
Kühberger, A.3
-
6
-
-
84890880353
-
Publication bias and the correlation between effect size and sample size in psychological research: Sources, consequences, and remedies
-
Manuscript submitted for publication
-
Fritz A. Scherndl T. Kühberger A. (2013b). Publication bias and the correlation between effect size and sample size in psychological research: Sources, consequences, and remedies. Manuscript submitted for publication.
-
(2013)
-
-
Fritz, A.1
Scherndl, T.2
Kühberger, A.3
-
8
-
-
0000324575
-
Do studies of statistical power have an effect on the power of studies?
-
doi:, 10.1037/0033–2909.105.2.309
-
Sedlmeier P. Gigerenzer G. (1989). Do studies of statistical power have an effect on the power of studies? Psychological Bulletin, 105, 309–316. doi:10.1037/0033–2909.105.2.309
-
(1989)
Psychological Bulletin
, vol.105
, pp. 309-316
-
-
Sedlmeier, P.1
Gigerenzer, G.2
-
9
-
-
0035859525
-
Systematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis
-
doi:, 10.1136/bmj.323.7304.101
-
Sterne J. A. C. Egger M. Smith G. D. (2001). Systematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis. British Medical Journal, 323, 101–105. doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7304.101
-
(2001)
British Medical Journal
, vol.323
, pp. 101-105
-
-
Sterne, J.A.C.1
Egger, M.2
Smith, G.D.3
|